SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Orme NM, Fletcher JG, Siddiki HA, et al. Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:152532.
  • 2
    Rangel EK. The management of incidental findings in neuro-imaging research: framework and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2010;38:11726.
  • 3
    Yeh DD, Imam AM, Truong SH, et al. Incidental findings in trauma patients: dedicated communication with the primary care physician ensures adequate follow-up. World J Surg 2013;37:20815.
  • 4
    Lohn Z, Adam S, Birch PH, Friedman JM. Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review. J Genet Couns 2013, DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9604-4.
  • 5
    McGuire AL, Lupski JR. Personal genome research: what should the participant be told? Trends Genet 2010;26:199201.
  • 6
    Wolf SM, Annas GJ, Elias S. Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science 2013;340:104950.
  • 7
    McGuire AL, Joffe S, Koenig BA, et al. Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science 2013;340:10478.
  • 8
    Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW, et al. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15:56574.
  • 9
    McGillivray G, Rosenfeld JA, McKinlay Gardner RJ, et al. Genetic counselling and ethical issues with chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:38995.
  • 10
    Dondorp W, Sikkema-Raddatz B, de Die-Smulders C, et al. Arrays in postnatal and prenatal diagnosis: an exploration of the ethics of consent. Hum Mutat 2012;33:91622.
  • 11
    Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP. Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med 2011;13:499504.
  • 12
    Johnston JJ, Rubinstein WS, Facio FM, et al. Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:97108.
  • 13
    Green RC, Berg JS, Berry GT, et al. Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet Med 2012;14:40510.
  • 14
    Dimmock D. Whole genome sequencing: a considered approach to clinical implementation. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2013; Chapter 9:Unit 9 22, DOI: 10.1002/0471142905.hg0922s77
  • 15
    Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. Br Med J 1994;309:1848.
  • 16
    Fernandez CV, Strahlendorf C, Avard D, et al. Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting. Genet Med 2013;15:55864.
  • 17
    Knoppers BM. Paediatric research and the communication of not-so incidental findings. Paediatr Child Health 2012;17:1902.
  • 18
    American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification. Genet Med 2013;15:6646.
  • 19
    Pergament E. Controversies and challenges of array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal genetic diagnosis. Genet Med 2007;9:5969.
  • 20
    Wapner RJ, Driscoll DA, Simpson JL. Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:396400.
  • 21
    Borry P, Stultiens L, Nys H, et al. Presymptomatic and predictive genetic testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Clin Genet 2006;70:37481.
  • 22
    European Society of Human Genetics. Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: recommendations of the European society of human genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2009;17:7201.
  • 23
    Erez A, Plunkett K, Sutton VR, et al. The right to ignore genetic status of late onset genetic disease in the genomic era; prenatal testing for Huntington disease as a paradigm. Am J Med Genet A 2010;152A:177480.
  • 24
    Evers-Kiebooms G, Fryns JP, Demyttenaere K, et al. Predictive and preimplantation genetic testing for Huntington's disease and other late onset dominant disorders: not in conflict but complementary. Clin Genet 1996;50:2756.
  • 25
    Daack-Hirsch S, Driessnack M, Hanish A, et al. ‘Information is information’: a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing. Clin Genet 2013;84:118.
  • 26
    Booth BE, Verma M, Beri RS. Fetal sex determination in infants in Punjab, India: correlations and implications. BMJ 1994;309:125961.
  • 27
    Yasmin S, Mukherjee A, Manna N, et al. Gender preference and awareness regarding sex determination among antenatal mothers attending a medical college of Eastern India. Scand J Public Health 2013;41:34450.
  • 28
    Christian SM, Koehn D, Pillay R, et al. Parental decisions following prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy: a trend over time. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:3740.
  • 29
    Statham H, Green JM, Kafetsios K. Who worries that something might be wrong with the baby? a prospective study of 1072 pregnant women. Birth 1997;24:22333.
  • 30
    van El CG, Cornel MC, Borry P, et al. Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European society of human genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 2013;21:5804.
  • 31
    MacLeod R, Tibben A, Frontali M, et al. Recommendations for the predictive genetic test in Huntington's disease. Clin Genet 2013;83:22131.