Original Report
A systematic review of validated methods for identifying suicide or suicidal ideation using administrative or claims data
Article first published online: 19 JAN 2012
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2335
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Supplement: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel Program
Volume 21, Issue Supplement S1, pages 174–182, January 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Walkup, J. T., Townsend, L., Crystal, S. and Olfson, M. (2012), A systematic review of validated methods for identifying suicide or suicidal ideation using administrative or claims data. Pharmacoepidem. Drug Safe., 21: 174–182. doi: 10.1002/pds.2335
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 19 JAN 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- suicide;
- epidemiology;
- self-injury;
- emergency department
ABSTRACT
Purpose
As part of the Mini-Sentinel pilot program, under contract with the Food and Drug Administration, an effort has been made to evaluate the validity of algorithms useful for identifying health outcomes of interest, including suicide and suicide attempt.
Method
Literature was reviewed to evaluate how well medical episodes associated with these events could be identified in administrative or claims data sets from the USA or Canada.
Results
Six studies were found to include sufficient detail to assess performance characteristics of an algorithm on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, E-codes (950–959) for intentional self-injury. Medical records and death registry information were used to validate classification. Sensitivity ranged from 13.8% to 65%, and positive predictive value range from 4.0% to 100%. Study comparisons are difficult to interpret, however, as the studies differed substantially in many important elements, including design, sample, setting, and methods. Although algorithm performance varied widely, two studies located in prepaid medical plans reported that comparisons of database codes to medical charts could achieve good agreement.
Conclusions
Insufficient data exist to support specific recommendations regarding a preferred algorithm, and caution should be exercised in interpreting clinical and pharmacological epidemiological surveillance and research that rely on these codes as measures of suicide-related outcomes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1557/asset/PDS_left.gif?v=1&s=f962ae698249deba4dc56217f1bb95eac528fe4d)
1099-1557/asset/PDS_right.gif?v=1&s=44103455c6e4e28135198609bb6a426efee9a51c)