Is the concept of ‘personality’ relevant to the study of animal aggression?
Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2006
Copyright © 1989 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
European Journal of Personality
Volume 3, Issue 2, pages 139–148, June 1989
How to Cite
Karli, P. (1989), Is the concept of ‘personality’ relevant to the study of animal aggression?. Eur. J. Pers., 3: 139–148. doi: 10.1002/per.2410030207
- Issue online: 22 FEB 2006
- Version of Record online: 22 FEB 2006
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 OCT 1988
- Manuscript Received: 27 JUN 1988
Both theoretical considerations and methodological constraints explain why the experimental study of animal aggression does not often put much emphasis on individual differences and hardly uses the concept of ‘personality’. And yet, if neurobiologists consider those brain mechanisms that underlie the interpretation of a given situation and the anticipation of a method to cope with it, they are led to investigate mechanisms that underlie a number of behaviour dimensions which the psychologist would refer to as ‘personality’. The actual object considered in either case does not essentially differ. This is exemplified more concretely by examining the kind of factors—and the brain mechanisms involved in their very existence or in their processing—that contribute to determine the probability that in the face of a given situation, a given individual will adopt aggressive behaviour as the coping strategy.