SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • solar cell efficiency;
  • photovoltaic efficiency;
  • energy conversion efficiency

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. NEW RESULTS
  5. DISCLAIMER
  6. REFERENCES

Consolidated tables showing an extensive listing of the highest independently confirmed efficiencies for solar cells and modules are presented. Guidelines for inclusion of results into these tables are outlined and new entries since June 2010 are reviewed. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


INTRODUCTION

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. NEW RESULTS
  5. DISCLAIMER
  6. REFERENCES

Since January 1993, ‘Progress in Photovoltaics’ has published six monthly listings of the highest confirmed efficiencies for a range of photovoltaic cell and module technologies 1–3. By providing guidelines for the inclusion of results into these tables, this not only provides an authoritative summary of the current state of the art but also encourages researchers to seek independent confirmation of results and to report results on a standardised basis. In a recent version of these tables (Version 33) 2, results were updated to the new internationally accepted reference spectrum (IEC 60904–3, Ed. 2, 2008), where this was possible.

The most important criterion for inclusion of results into the tables is that they must have been measured by a recognised test centre listed elsewhere 1. A distinction is made between three different eligible areas: total area; aperture area and designated illumination area 1. ‘Active area’ efficiencies are not included. There are also certain minimum values of the area sought for the different device types (above 0.05 cm2 for a concentrator cell, 1 cm2 for a one-sun cell and 800 cm2 for a module) 1.

Results are reported for cells and modules made from different semiconductors and for subcategories within each semiconductor grouping (e.g. crystalline, polycrystalline and thin film). From Version 36 onwards, spectral response information has been included when available in the form of a plot of the external quantum efficiency (EQE) versus wavelength, normalized to the peak measured value.

NEW RESULTS

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. NEW RESULTS
  5. DISCLAIMER
  6. REFERENCES

Highest confirmed “one-sun” cell and module results are reported in Tables I and II. Any changes in the tables from those previously published 3 are set in bold type. In most cases, a literature reference is provided that describes either the result reported or a similar result. Table I summarises the best measurements for cells and submodules, while Table II shows the best results for modules. Table III contains what might be described as ‘notable exceptions’. While not conforming to the requirements to be recognized as a class record, the cells and modules in this Table have notable characteristics that will be of interest to sections of the photovoltaic community with entries based on their significance and timeliness.

Table I. Confirmed terrestrial cell and submodule efficiencies measured under the global AM1.5 spectrum (1000 W/m2) at 25°C (IEC 60904–3: 2008, ASTM G-173–03 global).
ClassificationaEffic.b (%)Areac (cm2)Voc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FFd (%)Test Centree (and Date)Description
  • a

    CIGS = CuInGaSe2; a-Si = amorphous silicon/hydrogen alloy.

  • b

    Effic. = efficiency.

  • c

    (ap) = aperture area; (t) = total area; (da) = designated illumination area.

  • d

    FF = fill factor.

  • e

    FhG-ISE = Fraunhofer Institut für Solare Energiesysteme; JQA = Japan Quality Assurance; AIST = Japanese National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.

  • f

    Spectral response reported in Version 36 of these tables.

  • g

    Recalibrated from original measurement.

  • h

    Reported on a ‘per cell’ basis.

  • i

    Not measured at an external laboratory.

  • j

    Spectral response reported in present version of these tables.

  • k

    Light soaked at Oerlikon prior to testing at NREL (1000 h, 1 sun, 50°C).

  • l

    Measured under IEC 60904–3 Ed. 1: 1989 reference spectrum.

  • m

    Stability not investigated. References 32 and 33 review the stability of similar devices.

  • n

    Stabilised by 1000 h, 1 sun illumination at a sample temperature of 50°C.

  • o

    Stabilised by 174 h, 1 sun illumination after 20 h, 5 sun illumination at a sample temperature of 50°C.

Silicon
Si (crystalline)25.0 ± 0.54.00 (da)0.70642.7f82.8Sandia (3/99)gUNSW PERL 17
Si (multicrystalline)20.4 ± 0.51.002 (ap)0.66438.080.9NREL (5/04)gFhG-ISE 18
Si (thin film transfer)16.7 ± 0.44.017 (ap)0.64533.078.2FhG-ISE (7/01)gU. Stuttgart (45 µm thick) 19
Si (thin film submodule)10.5 ± 0.394.0 (ap)0.492h29.7h72.1FhG-ISE (8/07)gCSG Solar (1–2 µm on glass; 20 cells) 20
III–V cells
GaAs (thin film)27.6 ± 0.80.9989 (ap)1.10729.6j84.1NREL (11/10)Alta Devices4
GaAs (multicrystalline)18.4 ± 0.54.011 (t)0.99423.279.7NREL (11/95)gRTI, Ge substrate 21
InP (crystalline)22.1 ± 0.74.02 (t)0.87829.585.4NREL (4/90)gSpire, epitaxial 22
Thin Film Chalcogenide
CIGS (cell)19.6 ± 0.6i0.996 (ap)0.71334.8j79.2NREL (4/09)NREL, CIGS on glass5, 23
CIGS (submodule)16.7 ± 0.416.0 (ap)0.661h33.6h75.1FhG-ISE (3/00)gU. Uppsala, 4 serial cells 24
CdTe (cell)16.7 ± 0.5h1.032 (ap)0.84526.175.5NREL (9/01)gNREL, mesa on glass 25
CdTe (submodule)12.5 ± 0.435.03 (ap)0.83821.2j70.5NREL (9/10)ASP Hangzhou, 8 serial cells
Amorphous/nanocrystalline Si
Si (amorphous)10.1 ± 0.3k1.036 (ap)0.88616.75f67NREL (7/09)Oerlikon Solar Lab, Neuchatel 26
Si (nanocrystalline)10.1 ± 0.2l1.199 (ap)0.53924.476.6JQA (12/97)Kaneka (2 µm on glass) 27
Photochemical
Dye sensitised10.4 ± 0.3m1.004(ap)0.7292265.2AIST (8/05)gSharp 28
Dye sensitized (submodule)9.9 ± 0.4m17.11 (ap)0.719h19.4h,j71.4AIST (8/10)Sony, 8 parallel cells6
Organic
Organic polymer8.3 ± 0.3m1.031 (ap)0.81614.46j70.2NREL(11/10)Konarka7
Organic (submodule)3.5 ± 0.3m208.4 (ap)8.620.84748.3NREL (7/09)Solarmer 29
Multijunction devices
GaInP/GaAs/Ge32.0 ± 1.5l3.989 (t)2.62214.3785NREL (1/03)Spectrolab (monolithic)
GaAs/CIS (thin film)25.8 ± 1.3l4.00 (t)NREL (11/89)Kopin/Boeing (4 terminal) 30
a-Si/µc-Si (thin film cell)11.9 ± 0.8n1.2271.34612.92j68.5NREL (8/10)Oerlikon Solar Lab, Neuchatel8
a-Si/µc-Si (thin film submodule)j,l11.7 ± 0.4l,o14.23 (ap)5.4622.9971.3AIST (9/04)Kaneka (thin film) 31
Organic (2-cell tandem)8.3 ± 0.3m1.087 (ap)1.7338.03j59.5FhG-ISE (10/10)Heliatek9
Table II. Confirmed terrestrial module efficiencies measured under the global AM1.5 spectrum (1000 W/m2) at a cell temperature of 25°C (IEC 60904–3: 2008, ASTM G-173–03 global).
ClassificationaEffic.b (%)Areac (cm2)Voc (V)Isc (A)FFd (%)Test centre (and date)Description
  • a

    CIGSS = CuInGaSSe; a-Si = amorphous silicon/hydrogen alloy; a-SiGe = amorphous silicon/germanium/hydrogen alloy.

  • b

    Effic. = efficiency.

  • c

    (ap) = aperture area; (da) = designated illumination area.

  • d

    FF = fill factor.

  • e

    Recalibrated from original measurement.

  • f

    Spectral response reported in present version of these tables.

  • g

    Lightsoaked at NREL for 1000 h at 50°C, nominally 1-sun illumination.

  • h

    Measured under IEC 60904–3 Ed. 1: 1989 reference spectrum.

Si (crystalline)22.9 ± 0.6778 (da)5.63.9780.3Sandia (9/96)eUNSW/Gochermann 34
Si (large crystalline)21.4 ± 0.615780 (ap)68.66.29378.4NREL (10/09)SunPower 35
Si (multicrystalline)17.55 ± 0.514701 (ap)38.318.94f75.3ESTI (8/10)Schott Solar (60 serial cells)10
Si (thin-film polycrystalline)8.2 ± 0.2661(ap)250.3268Sandia (7/02)ePacific Solar (1–2 µm on glass) 36
CIGS15.7 ± 0.59703 (ap)28.247.254f72.5NREL (11/10)Miasole11
CIGSS (Cd free)13.5 ± 0.73459 (ap)31.22.1868.9NREL (8/02)eShowa Shell 37
CdTe10.9 ± 0.54874 (ap)26.213.2462.3NREL (4/00)eBP Solarex 38
a-Si/a-SiGe/a-SiGe (tandem)10.4 ± 0.5g,h905 (ap)4.3533.28566NREL (10/98)eUSSC 39
Table III. ‘Notable Exceptions’: ‘Top ten’ confirmed cell and module results, not class records measured under the global AM1.5 spectrum (1000 Wm−2) at 25°C (IEC 60904–3: 2008, ASTM G-173–03 global).
ClassificationaEffic.b (%)Areac (cm2)Voc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FF (%)Test centre (and date)Description
  • a

    CIGS = CuInGaSe2.

  • b

    Effic. = efficiency.

  • c

    (ap)= aperture area; (t) = total area; (da) = designated illumination area.

  • d

    Recalibrated from original measurement.

  • e

    Spectral response reported in present version of these tables.

  • f

    Spectral response reported in Version 36 of these tables.

  • g

    Light soaked under 100mW/cm2 white light at 50°C for 1000 h.

  • h

    Stability not investigated.

Cells (silicon)
Si (MCZ crystalline)24.7 ± 0.54.0 (da)0.7044283.5Sandia (7/99)dUNSW PERL, SEH MCZ substrate 40
Si (large crystalline)24.2 ± 0.7155.1(t)0.72140.5e82.9NREL (5/10)Sunpower n-type CZ substrate12
Si (large crystalline)23.0 ± 0.6100.4(t)0.72939.680AIST (2/09)Sanyo HIT, n-type substrate 41
Si (large multicrystalline)19.3 ± 0.5217.7(t)0.65138.8f76.4AIST (7/09)Mitsubishi Electric honeycomb 42
Cells (other)
GaInP/GaAs/GaInAs (tandem)35.8 ± 1.50.880 (ap)3.01213.985.3AIST (9/09)Sharp, monolithic 43
CIGS (thin film)20.3 ± 0.60.5015 (ap)0.74035.4e77.5FhG-ISE (6/10)ZSW Stuttgart, CIGS on glass13
a-Si/nc-Si/nc-Si (tandem)12.5 ± 0.7 g0.27 (da)2.019.1168.4NREL (3/09)United Solar stabilised 44
Dye-sensitised11.2 ± 0.3h0.219 (ap)0.7362172.2AIST (3/06)dSharp 45
Luminescent submodule7.1 ± 0.2h25(ap)1.0088.8479.5ESTI (9/08)ECN Petten, GaAs cells14

To ensure discrimination, Table III is limited to nominally 10 entries with the present authors having voted for their preferences for inclusion. Readers who have suggestions of results for inclusion into this table are welcome to contact any of the authors with full details. Suggestions conforming to the guidelines will be included on the voting list for a future issue.

Table IV shows the best results for concentrator cells and concentrator modules (a smaller number of ‘notable exceptions’ for concentrator cells and modules additionally is included in Table IV).

Table IV. Terrestrial concentrator cell and module efficiencies measured under the ASTM G-173–03 direct beam AM1.5 spectrum at a cell temperature of 25°C.
ClassificationEffic.a (%)Areab (cm2)Intensityc (suns)Test centre (and date)Description
  • a

    Effic. = efficiency.

  • b

    (da) = designated illumination area; (ap) = aperture area.

  • c

    One sun corresponds to direct irradiance of 1000 W/m.

  • d

    Not measured at an external laboratory.

  • e

    Spectral response reported in Version 36 of these tables.

  • f

    Measured under a low aerosol optical depth spectrum similar to ASTM G-173–03 direct52.

  • g

    Measured under old ASTM E891–87 reference spectrum.

  • h

    Recalibrated from original measurement.

  • i

    Spectral response reported in the present version of these tables.

Single cells
GaAs29.1 ± 1.3d,e0.0505 (da)117FhG-ISE (3/10)Fraunhofer ISE
Si27.6 ± 1.0f1.00 (da)92FhG-ISE (11/04)Amonix back-contact 46
Multijunction cells
InGaP/GaAs/InGaAs (2-terminal)42.3 ± 2.5i0.9756 (ap)406NREL (9/10)Spire, bi-facial epigrowth15
GaInP/GaInAs/Ge (2-terminal)41.6 ± 2.5e0.3174(da)364NREL (8/09)Spectrolab, lattice-matched 47
Submodules
GaInP/GaAs; GaInAsP/GaInAs38.5 ± 1.9i0.202 (ap)20NREL (8/08)DuPont et al., split spectrum16
GaInP/GaAs/Ge27.0 ± 1.5g34 (ap)10NREL (5/00)ENTECH 48
Modules
Si20.5 ± 0.8d1875 (ap)79Sandia (4/89)hSandia/UNSW/ENTECH (12 cells) 49
Notable exceptions
GaInP/GaAs (2-terminal)32.6 ± 2.0e0.010 (da)1026FhG-ISE (9/08)U. Polytecnica de Madrid 50
Si (large area)21.7 ± 0.720.0 (da)11Sandia (9/90)hUNSW laser grooved 51

Fourteen new results are reported in the present version of these Tables.

The first new result in Table I is an outright record for solar conversion by any single-junction photovoltaic device. An efficiency of 27.6% has been measured at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) for a 1 cm2 thin-film GaAs device fabricated by Alta Devices, Inc.. Alta Devices is a Santa Clara based “start-up” seeking to develop low-cost, 30% efficient solar modules 4.

The second new result in Table I is an efficiency improvement to 19.6% for a 1 cm2 single-junction copper–indium–gallium–selenide (CIGS) cell fabricated by and measured at NREL 5. Although CIGS efficiency of 20% and higher has been reported previously by two groups (see Table III), this has been for cells appreciably less than 1 cm2 in area, the minimum considered reasonable for efficiency comparisons in these Tables and for milestones in most of the international programs.

A third new result in Table I is 12.5% efficiency for an eight cell 35 cm2 CdTe submodule fabricated by Advanced Solar Power (ASP) Hangzhou, also measured by NREL.

A fourth new result in Table I is for a dye sensitized submodule with efficiency of 9.9% reported for a 17 cm2 submodule fabricated by Sony 6 and measured by the Japanese National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST). This is quite close to the record of 10.4% efficiency for the best individual dye sensitised cell yet confirmed (of more that 1 cm2 area).

Another outstanding new result is the measurement of 8.3% efficiency at NREL for a 1cm2 organic cell fabricated by Konarka 7, representing a massive improvement over the company's previous 5.15% record entry. An intermediate result of 6.5% was measured in July 2010.

Another new result in Table I is for a double-junction amorphous/microcrystalline silicon cell with stabilized efficiency of 11.9% reported for a 1.2 cm2 cell fabricated by Oerlikon and Corning 8 and again measured by NREL, after stabilization.

The final new result in Table I is for a double-junction organic solar cell with 8.3% efficiency measured for a 1.1 cm2 cell fabricated by Heliatek 9 and measured by the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (FhG-ISE). This represents rapid progress from the 6.1% result from Heliatek measured in June last year and reported in the previous version of these Tables. An intermediate result of 7.7% was measured in March 2010.

Following a similarly vigorous burst of activity in the multicrystalline silicon module area reported in the two previous versions of these Tables, where four groups exceeded the previous record for module efficiency over the two reporting periods, a fifth group has done even better. In Table II, a new efficiency record of 17.55% is reported for a large (1.5 m2 aperture area) module fabricated by Schott Solar 10 and measured by the European Solar Test Installation, Ispra (ESTI).

Also reported in Table II is a record result for a thin-film module, with a large improvement to 15.7% reported for a 1 m2 CIGS module fabricated by Miasole 11 and measured by NREL.

The first new result in Table III relates to an efficiency increase to 24.2% for a large 155 cm2 silicon cell fabricated on an n-type Czochralski grown wafer, with the cell fabricated by SunPower 12 and also measured by NREL.

Another new result in Table III is the further improvement of a small area (0.5 cm2) CIGS cell fabricated by Zentrum für Sonnenenergie- und Wasserstoff- Forschung (ZSW), Stuttgart 13 to 20.3% efficiency as measured by FhG-ISE. This cell is smaller than the 1 cm2 size required for classification as an outright record, as previously discussed.

The final new result in Table III is for a luminescent concentrating submodule using high performance GaAs cells placed along the edge of a luminescent plate to convert the collected luminescent radiation. An efficiency of 7.1% was confirmed for a 25 cm2 test device fabricated by ECN, Netherlands 14 and measured by ESTI.

Two more new results are reported in Table IV for more conventional concentrator cells and systems. The first is a new efficiency record for any photovoltaic cell with 42.3% efficiency measured by NREL at 406 suns concentration (irradiance) for a 1 cm2 cell fabricated by the Spire Corporation 15. A new approach was used whereby a low bandgap InGaAs cell was grown on one side of a GaAs wafer, with the wafer then flipped over and an intermediate bandgap GaAs followed by a high bandgap InGaP cell grown on the other side.

The final new result represents a new record for the conversion of sunlight to electricity by any means. An efficiency of 38.5% was measured by NREL for a very small area (0.2 cm2) spectral-splitting submodule at about 20 suns concentration as the result of a multi-institutional effort headed by DuPont 16. This complete lens/cell assembly uses a dichroic reflector to steer light to two different two-cell stacks, one on a GaAs substrate and one on an InP substrate.

The external quantum efficiencies (EQE) normalized to the peak EQE values for the new organic cell results of Table I are shown in Figure 1(a) as well as the response for the GaAs cell and CdTe and dye-sensitised submodules of Table I. Also shown is the decomposition into the top and bottom cell response for the 8.3% Heliatek tandem cell of Table I. Interestingly, both cells in the stack have largely overlapping spectral response range, although complementary in some aspects.

thumbnail image

Figure 1. (a) Normalised external quantum efficiency (EQE) for the new organic and GaAs cell results in this issue and for the new CdTe and dye-sensitised submodule results; (b) Normalised EQE for the three new CIGS cell and module entries in this issue plus for the three new silicon cell and module results; (c) EQE of the composite cells for the new concentrator cell and submodule entries in the present issue.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Figure 1(b) shows the normalized EQE of the new CIGS and silicon results in the present issue of these tables. Quite striking is the almost identical responses of the NREL and ZSW CIGS cells with the higher current from the ZSW cell attributed to a slightly lower bandgap edge. The normalized responses of both cells in the Oerliken/Corning micromorph tandem cell are also shown.

Figure 1(c) shows the absolute EQE for the different cells contributing to the new concentrator cell and submodule results of Table IV. The much narrower response bandwidth of the bottom InGaAs cell in the 42.3% Spire monolithic stack compared to the response of the bottom Ge in the 41.6% Spectrolab device 3 reflects a higher bandgap. This gives a higher voltage output that contributes to the improved performance. The EQE for the 38.5% submodule differs slightly from results reported elsewhere 16 due to incorporation of the effect of the dichroic reflector used in this system. Each of the four cells in this system is contacted separately, removing the need for current matching.

DISCLAIMER

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. NEW RESULTS
  5. DISCLAIMER
  6. REFERENCES

While the information provided in the tables is provided in good faith, the authors, editors and publishers cannot accept direct responsibility for any errors or omissions.

REFERENCES

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. INTRODUCTION
  4. NEW RESULTS
  5. DISCLAIMER
  6. REFERENCES
  • 1
    Green MA, Emery K, King DL, Igari S. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 15). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2000; 8: 187196.
  • 2
    Green MA, Emery K, Hishikawa Y, Warta W. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 33). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2009; 17: 8594.
  • 3
    Green MA, Emery K, Hishikawa Y, Warta W. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 36). Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2010; 18: 346352.
  • 4
  • 5
    Repins I, Contreras MA, Egaas B, DeHart C, Scharf J, Perkins CL, To B, Noufi R. 19·9%-efficient ZnO/CdS/CuInGaSe2 solar cell with 81·2% fill factor. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2008; 16: 235239.
  • 6
    Morooka M, Ogura R, Orihashi M, Takenaka M. Development of dye-sensitized solar cells for practical applications. Electrochemistry 2009; 77: 960965.
  • 7
  • 8
    Bailat J, Fesquet L, Orhan J, Djeridane Y, Wolf B, Madliger P, Steinhauser J, Benagli S, Borrello D, Castens L, Monteduro G, Marmelo M, Dehbozorghi B, Valltat-Sauvain E, Multone X, Romang D, Boucher J, Meier J, Kroll U. Recent developments of high-efficiency micromorph® tandem solar cells in Kai-M PECVD reactors. 25th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf., Valencia, Sept. 2010.
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
    Cousins PJ, Smith DD, Luan HC, Manning J, Dennis TD, Waldhauer A, Wilson KE, Harley G, Mulligan GP. Gen III: improved performance at lower cost. 35th IEEE PVSC, Honolulu, HI, June 2010.
  • 13
  • 14
    Slooff LH, Bende EE, Burgers AR, Budel T, Pravettoni M, Kenny RP, Dunlop ED, Buechtemann A. A luminescent solar concentrator with 7.1% power conversion efficiency. Physica Status Solidi (RRL) 2008; 2(6): 257259.
  • 15
    Wojtczuk S, Chiu P, Zhang X, Derkacs D, Harris C, Pulver D, Timmons M. InGaP/GaAs/InGaAs concentrators using Bi-facial epigrowth. 35th IEEE PVSC, Honolulu, HI, June 2010.
  • 16
    McCambridge JD, Steiner MA, Unger BA, Emery KA, Christensen EL, Wanlass MW, Gray AL, Takacs L, Buelow R, McCollum TA, Ashmead JW, Schmidt GR, Haas AW, Wilcox JR, Meter JV, Gray JL, Moore DT, Barnett AM, Schwartz RJ. Compact spectrum splitting photovoltaic module with high efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications (published on-line on 24 September 2010).
  • 17
    Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA, Ferrazza F. Novel 19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 1998; 73: 19911993.
  • 18
    Schultz O, Glunz SW, Willeke GP. Multicrystalline silicon solar cells exceeding 20% efficiency. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 2004; 12: 553558.
  • 19
    Bergmann RB, Rinke TJ, Berge C, Schmidt J, Werner JH. Advances in monocrystalline Si thin-film solar cells by layer transfer. Technical Digest, PVSEC-12, Chefju Island, Korea, June 2001, 1115.
  • 20
    Keevers MJ, Young TL, Schubert U, Green MA. 10% Efficient CSG minimodules. 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Milan, September 2007.
  • 21
    Venkatasubramanian R, O'Quinn BC, Hills JS, Sharps PR, Timmons ML, Hutchby JA, Field H, Ahrenkiel A, Keyes B. 18.2% (AM1.5) efficient GaAs solar cell on optical-grade polycrystalline Ge substrate. Conference Record, 25th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Washington, May 1997, 3136.
  • 22
    Keavney CJ, Haven VE, Vernon SM. Emitter structures in MOCVD InP solar cells. Conference Record, 21st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Kissimimee, May 1990, 141144.
  • 23
    Repins I, Contreras M, Romero Y, Yan Y, Metzger W, Li J, Johnston S, Egaas B, DeHart C, Scharf J, McCandless BE, Noufi R. Characterization of 19.9%-efficienct CIGS absorbers. IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference Record, 2008; 33.
  • 24
    Kessler J, Bodegard M, Hedstrom J, Stolt L. New world record Cu (In,Ga) Se2 based mini-module: 16.6%. Proceedings of the 16th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Glasgow, 2000, 20572060.
  • 25
    Wu X, Keane JC, Dhere RG, DeHart C, Duda A, Gessert TA, Asher S, Levi DH, Sheldon P. 16.5%-efficient CdS/CdTe polycrystalline thin-film solar cell. Proceedings of the 17th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, 22–26 October 2001, 9951000.
  • 26
    Benagli S, Borrello D, Vallat-Sauvain E, Meier J, Kroll U, Hötzel J, Spitznagel J, Steinhauser J, Castens L, Djeridane Y. High-efficiency amorphous silicon devices on LPCVD-ZnO TCO prepared in industrial KAI-M R&D reactor. 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Hamburg, September 2009.
  • 27
    Yamamoto K, Toshimi M, Suzuki T, Tawada Y, Okamoto T, Nakajima A. Thin film poly-Si solar cell on glass substrate fabricated at low temperature. MRS Spring Meeting, San Francisco, April 1998.
  • 28
    Chiba Y, Islam A, Kakutani K, Komiya R, Koide N, Han L. High efficiency dye sensitized solar cells. Technical Digest, 15th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Shanghai, October 2005, 665666.
  • 29
  • 30
    Mitchell K, Eberspacher C, Ermer J, Pier D. Single and tandem junction CuInSe2 cell and module technology. Conference Record, 20th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. Las Vegas, September 1988, 13841389.
  • 31
    Yoshimi M, Sasaki T, Sawada T, Suezaki T, Meguro T, Matsuda T, Santo K, Wadano K, Ichikawa M, Nakajima A, Yamamoto K. High efficiency thin film silicon hybrid solar cell module on 1m2-class large area substrate. Conference Record, 3rd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Osaka, May, 2003; 15661569.
  • 32
    Jorgensen M, Norrman K, Krebs FC. Stability/Degradation of polymer solar cells. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2008; 92: 686714.
  • 33
    Kato N, Higuchi K, Tanaka H, Nakajima J, Sano T, Toyoda T. Improvement in the long-term stability of dye-sensitized solar cell for outdoor use. Presented at 19th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Korea, November 2009.
  • 34
    Zhao J, Wang A, Yun F, Zhang G, Roche DM, Wenham SR, Green MA. 20,000 PERL silicon cells for the “1996 World Solar Challenge” solar car race. Progress in Photovoltaics 1997; 5: 269276.
  • 35
    Swanson RM. Solar cells at the cusp. Presented at 19th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Korea, November 2009.
  • 36
    Basore PA. Pilot production of thin-film crystalline silicon on glass modules. Conference Record, 29th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, New Orleans, May 2002, 4952.
  • 37
    Tanaka Y, Akema N, Morishita T, Okumura D, Kushiya K. Improvement of Voc upward of 600mV/cell with CIGS-based absorber prepared by selenization/sulfurization. Conference Proceedings, 17th EC Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, October 2001, 989994.
  • 38
    Cunningham D, Davies K, Grammond L, Mopas E, O'Connor N, Rubcich M, Sadeghi M, Skinner D, Trumbly T. Large area Apollo™ module performance and reliability. Conference Record, 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Alaska, September 2000, 1318.
  • 39
    Yang J, Banerjee A, Glatfelter T, Hoffman K, Xu X, Guha S. Progress in triple-junction amorphous silicon-based alloy solar cells and modules using hydrogen dilution. Conference Record, 1st World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Hawaii, December 1994, 380385.
  • 40
    Zhao J, Wang A, Green MA. 24.5% efficiency silicon PERT cells on MCZ substrates and 24.7% efficiency PERL cells on FZ substrates. Progress in Photovoltaics 1999; 7: 471474.
  • 41
    Maruyama E, Terakawa A, Taguchi M, Yoshimine Y, Ide D, Baba T, Shima M, Sakata H, Tanaka M. Sanyo's challenges to the development of high-efficiency HIT solar cells and the expansion of HIT business. 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCEP-4), Hawaii, May 2006.
  • 42
    Niinobe D, Nishimura K, Matsuno S, Fujioka H, Katsura T, Okamoto T, Ishihara T, Morikawa H, Arimoto S. Honeycomb structured multi-crystalline silicon solar cells with 18.6% efficiency via industrially applicable laser-process. 23rd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Valencia, Session Reference: 2CV.5.74, 2008.
  • 43
    Takamoto T, Sasaki K, Agui T, Juso H, Yoshida A, Nakaido K. III-V compound solar cells. SHARP Technical Journal 2010; 100: 110.
  • 44
    Yan B, Yue G, Guha S. Status of nc-Si:H solar cells at united solar and roadmap for manufacturing a-Si:H and nc-Si:H based solar panels. In Amorphous and Polycrystalline Thin-Film Silicon Science and Technology, ChuV, MiyazakiS, NathanA, YangJ, ZanH-W (eds). (Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 989, Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA, 2007), Paper #: 0989-A15-01. 2007.
  • 45
    Han L, Fukui A, Fuke N, Koide N, Yamanaka R. High efficiency of dye sensitized solar cell and module. 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCEP-4), Hawaii, May 2006.
  • 46
    Slade A, Garboushian V. 27.6% efficient silicon concentrator cell for mass production. Technical Digest, 15th International Photovoltaic Science and Engineering Conference, Shanghai, October 2005, 701.
  • 47
    King RR, Boca A, Hong W, Liu X-Q, Bhusari D, Larrabee D, Edmondson KM, Law DC, Fetzer CM, Mesropian S, Karam NH. Band-gap-engineered architectures for high-efficiency multijunction concentrator solar cells. Presented at the 24th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Hamburg, Germany, 21–25 September 2009.
  • 48
    O'Neil MJ, McDanal AJ. Outdoor measurement of 28% efficiency for a mini-concentrator module. Proceedings of the National Center for Photovoltaics Program Review Meeting, Denver, 16–19 April 2000.
  • 49
    Chiang CJ, Richards EH. A 20% efficient photovoltaic concentrator module. Conference Record, 21st IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Kissimimee, May 1990, 861863.
  • 50
    Garcia I, Rey-Stolle I, Gallana B, Algora C. A 32.6% efficient lattice-matched dual-junction solar cell working at 1000 suns. Applied Physics Letters 2009; 94: 053509.
  • 51
    Zhang F, Wenham SR, Green MA. Large area, concentrator buried contact solar cells. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 1995; 42: 144149.
  • 52
    Gueymard CA, Myers D, Emery K. Proposed reference irradiance spectra for solar energy systems testing. Solar Energy 2002; 73: 443467.