The early assessment conundrum: Lessons from the past, implications for the future

Authors

  • Catherine M. Bordignon,

    1. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Tony C.M. Lam

    Corresponding author
    1. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto
    • Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto (OISE/UT), Toronto, Ontario Canada M5S 1V6. E-mail: tlam@oise.utoronto.ca
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The early childhood educational field has garnered attention with initiatives to foster skill acquisition in young children prior to kindergarten entry. These initiatives, in conjunction with the rigorous demands of curricular reform and a burgeoning accountability movement, invoke questions regarding the adequacy of the instruments used to assess young children and the inherent difficulties in conducting such assessments. Because the effectiveness of education relies critically on the sound diagnoses of children's readiness for learning and the measurement of their subsequent progression throughout the schooling process, critical issues in early assessment must be addressed. An examination of past practices was synthesized with recent research to focus awareness on the insufficient content domain, restrictive context, adverse timing and questionable psychometric properties, specifically the inappropriate norms and low predictive validity, of many instruments. Both the implications of and compensatory strategies for each issue are considered. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 41: 737–749, 2004.

Ancillary