Research Article
Research-supported ideas for implementing reauthorized IDEA with intelligent professional psychological services
Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20188
Copyright © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Issue
1520-6807/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=bc81c672c49a9b6e854242d397a153f08fb4b244)
Psychology in the Schools
Special Issue: Special Issue, Part One: Integration of Cognitive Assessment and Response to Intervention
Volume 43, Issue 7, pages 781–796, September 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Berninger, V. W. (2006), Research-supported ideas for implementing reauthorized IDEA with intelligent professional psychological services. Psychol. Schs., 43: 781–796. doi: 10.1002/pits.20188
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 25 AUG 2006
Funded by
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Grant Numbers: RO1 HD25858, P50 33812
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
The recent reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA; 2004) is first discussed in its historical context. Then, a programmatic line of research (funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development since 1989) is described that is relevant to a proposed model for universal screening, providing instruction for grade-appropriate target reading or writing skills for at-risk students, monitoring student response to instruction, and diagnosing when necessary. It is recommended that the reauthorization of IDEA include the following in services for students with specific learning disabilities: Cognitive, Achievement, and Process Assessment (CAP), Implementation of Scientifically Supported Instruction (SSI), Response to Intervention (RTI), and Differential Diagnosis for Teaching (D2T). State legal code for the reauthorization of IDEA should allow school psychologists flexibility to practice their craft according to current scientific knowledge, professional standards, and best practices of their profession, coupled with Caring, Connecting, and Communicating (C3), so that students with specific learning disabilities and other developmental disabilities are well served. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 43: 781–796, 2006.

1520-6807/asset/PITS_left.gif?v=1&s=b5b7e01764775393abc921244c36d90e455d606a)
1520-6807/asset/PITS_centre.gif?v=1&s=54410c2cac17d40406f9ff50622d5de6e47bf1a0)
1520-6807/asset/PITS_right.gif?v=1&s=c836e7124a0ab4b5b0f25145fe35b26b2007a79f)