Research Article
Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems
Article first published online: 25 SEP 2006
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20192
Copyright © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Issue
1520-6807/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=bc81c672c49a9b6e854242d397a153f08fb4b244)
Psychology in the Schools
Special Issue: Special Issue, Part Two: Integration of Cognitive Assessment and Response to Intervention
Volume 43, Issue 8, pages 835–853, November 2006
Additional Information
How to Cite
Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B. and Snyder, L. E. (2006), Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems. Psychol. Schs., 43: 835–853. doi: 10.1002/pits.20192
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 SEP 2006
- Article first published online: 25 SEP 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Response to intervention (RTI) must be combined with comprehensive cognitive assessment to identify children with learning disabilities. This article presents the Cognitive Hypothesis Testing (CHT) model for integrating RTI and comprehensive evaluation practices in the identification of children with reading disabilities. The CHT model utilizes a scientific method approach for interpreting cognitive and neuropsychological processes together with evaluation of ecological and treatment validity data to develop targeted interventions for students who do not respond to standard academic interventions. A case study highlights how CHT practices can lead to effective interventions for a child who did not respond to a phonologically based reading intervention. In addition, discriminant analyses of 128 children with reading disabilities revealed the presence of Global, Phonemic, Fluency-Comprehension, and Orthographic subtypes. Results suggest subtypes show disparate cognitive profiles that differentially impact their reading achievement, supporting our contention that individual assessment of cognitive processing strengths and weaknesses is not only necessary for identifying children with reading disabilities but also can lead to individualized interventions designed to meet their unique learning needs. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 43: 835–853, 2006.

1520-6807/asset/PITS_left.gif?v=1&s=b5b7e01764775393abc921244c36d90e455d606a)
1520-6807/asset/PITS_centre.gif?v=1&s=54410c2cac17d40406f9ff50622d5de6e47bf1a0)
1520-6807/asset/PITS_right.gif?v=1&s=c836e7124a0ab4b5b0f25145fe35b26b2007a79f)