SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., III, Hampshire, E. M., Hines, N. R., Maples, K. A., Ostrom, J. K., & Van Buren, A. E. (1999). Meeting performance-based training demands: Accountability in an intervention-based practicum. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 357379.
  • Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2005). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Bonner, M., & Barnett, D. W. (2004). Intervention-based school psychology services: Training for child-level accountability; preparing for program-level accountability. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 2343.
  • Brown-Chidsey, R., Steege, M. W., & Mace, F. C. (2008). Best practices in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions using case study data. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Ed.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 21772191). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research designs and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cardillo, J. E., & Smith, A. (1994). Reliability of goal attainment scores. In T. J. Kiresuk, A. Smith, & J. E. Cardillo (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement (pp. 213242). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cincinnati Public Schools. (2009). Cincinnati Public Schools Teacher Evaluation System (TES), Revised 2009, Standards and Rubrics: School Psychologist Adaptation. Cincinnati, Ohio: Cincinnati Public Schools.
  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (Eds.). (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Delaware Department of Education. (2012). A framework for specialists domains and components – School psychologists. Retrieved from http://www.doe.k12.de.us/infosuites/staff/profdev/rti_files/A%20Framework%20for%20School%20Psychologists.pdf
  • Kane, T. J., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H., & Wooten, A. L. (2011). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: Can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement? Education Next, 11, 111.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Drawing valid inferences from case studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 183192.
  • Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (Eds.). (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kratochwill, T. R., Elliott, S. N., & Busse, R. T. (1995). Behavioral consultation: A five-year evaluation of consultant and client outcomes. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 87117.
  • MacKay, G., McCool, S., Cheseldine, S., & McCartney, E. (1993). Goal attainment scaling: A technique for evaluating conductive education. British Journal of Special Education, 20, 143147.
  • Mathur, S. R., Kavale, K. A., Quinn, M. M., Forness, S. R., & Rutherford, R. B. (1998). Social skills interventions for students with emotional and behavioral problems: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 193201.
  • Minke, K. M. (2011). Performance evaluation and accountability: Are you at the table? Communiqué, 39, 2.
  • Morrison, J. Q., Ellenwood, A., Sansosti, F., Cochrane, W., Jenkins, J., Evans, J., Miranda, A. H. (2011). Evaluation of the Ohio internship program in school psychology: Five-year summary, 2004–05 to 2008–09. Trainers of School Psychologists: Trainers’ Forum, 29, 3656.
  • Morrison, J. Q., Graden, J. L., & Barnett, D. W. (2009). Steps to evaluating a state-wide internship program: Model, trainee, and student outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 9891005.
  • National Alliance of Pupil Services Organizations. (2011). Utilizing multiple measures in determining professional performance of specialized instructional support personnel. Retrieved from www.napso.org
  • National Association of School Psychologists. (2010a). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services. Baltimore. MD: Author.
  • National Association of School Psychologists (2010b). Nationally certified school psychologist: application and information for graduates of non-NASP-approved programs. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/certification/NON_NASP_approved_NCSP_app.pdf
  • National Association of School Psychologists. (2010c). Standards for Graduate Preparation of School Psychologists. Baltimore. MD: Author.
  • Olive, M. L., & Smith, B. W. (2005). Effect size calculations and single subject designs. Educational Psychology, 25, 313324.
  • Polaha, J. A., & Allen, K. D. (1999). A tutorial for understanding and evaluating single-subject methodology. Proven Practice, 1, 7377.
  • Prus, J., & Waldron, N. (2008). Best practices in assessing performance in school psychology graduate programs. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V. (pp. 19431956). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Roach, A. T., & Elliott, S. N. (2005). Goal attainment scaling: An efficient and effective approach to monitoring student progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37, 817.
  • Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22, 221242.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 2433.
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Cook, S. B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260271.
  • Sheridan, S. (1992). Consultant and client outcomes of competency-based behavioral consultation training. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 245270.
  • Skalski, A. K. (2011). Should student achievement data be considered in the evaluation of school psychologists? Communiqué, 39, 14.
  • Sladeczek, I. E., Elliott, S. N., Kratochwill, T. R., Robertson-Mjaanes, S., & Stoiber, K. (2001). Application of goal attainment scaling to a conjoint behavioral consultation case. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 12, 4558.
  • Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (1994). Perspectives on validity. In T. J. Kiresuk, A. Smith, & J. E. Cardillo (Eds.), Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement (pp. 243272). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Steege, M. W., Brown-Chidsey, R., & Mace, F. C. (2002). Best practices in evaluating interventions. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV. (pp. 517534). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Steele, J. S., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2010). Incorporating student performance measures into teacher evaluation systems. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
  • Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 423432.
  • Yariv, E. (2006). “Mum effect”: Principals’ reluctance to submit negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 533546.
  • Ysseldyke, J., Burns, M., Dawson, P., Kelley, B., Morrison, D., Ortiz, S., . . . Telzrow, C. (2008). The blueprint for training and practice as the basis for best practices. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V. (pp. 3769). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.