SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ahissar, M. (2001). Perceptual training: A tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 1184211843. doi:10.1073/pnas.221461598PNAS
  • Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. (1983). An analysis of the incidence of special class placement: The masses are burgeoning. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 141147.
  • Aylward, E., Richards, T., Berninger, V., Nagy, W., Field, K., Grimme…Cramer, S. (2003). Instructional treatment associated with changes in brain activation in children with dyslexia. Neurology, 61, 212219.
  • Barnett, D. W., Daly III, E. J., Jones, K. M., & Lentz Jr, F. E. (2004). Response to Intervention Empirically Based Special Service Decisions From Single-Case Designs of Increasing and Decreasing Intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 6679.
  • Barth, A. E., Stuebing, K. K., Anthony, J. L., Denton, C. A., Mathes, P. G., Fletcher, J. M., & Francis, D. J. (2008). Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 296307.
  • Bateman, B. (1965). An educational view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 219239). Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.
  • Bennett K., & Cavanaugh R. A. (1998). Effects of immediate self-correction, delayed self-correction, and no correction on the acquisition and maintenance of multiplication facts by a fourth-grade student with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 303306. doi:10.1901/jaba.1998.31-303
  • Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 8595.
  • Brown-Chidsey, R., & Steege, M. W. (2005). Response to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2010). Exploratory and higher-order factor analyses of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) adolescent subsample. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 223235. doi:10.1037/a0022046
  • Casey B. M., Andrews N., Schindler H., Kersh J. E., Samper A., & Copley J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269309. doi:10.1080/07370000802177177
  • Castillo, J. M., Curtis, M. J., & Gelley, C. (2012). School psychologists professional practices and implications for the field. Communique, 40(8), 46.
  • Compton D. L. (2006). How should “unresponsiveness” to secondary intervention be operationalized? It is all about the nudge. Journal of learning disabilities, 39(2), 170173.
  • Curtis, M. J., Castillo, J. M., & Gelley, C. (2012). School Psychology 2010: Demographics, Employment, and the Context for Professional Practice Part 1. Communique, 40(7), 128.
  • Curtis, M. J., Grier, J., & Hunley, S. A. (2003). The changing face of school psychology: Trends in data and projections for the future. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(4), 409.
  • Dahlin K. I. E. (2011). Effects of working memory training on reading in children with special needs. Reading and Writing, 24(4), 479491. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9238-y
  • Dean, R. S., & Noggle, C. A. (2005). The Dean-Woodcock neuropsychological model with cognitive measures.X
  • Decker, S. L. (2012). Dimensional integration of assessment outcomes with intervention services for children with specific learning disabilities. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 175199.
  • Decker, S. L., Englund, J. A., & Roberts. A. M. (2012). Higher-Order Factor Structures for the WISC-IV: Implications for neuropsychological test interpretation. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 1–10. doi:10.1080/21622965.2012.737760
  • Decker, S. L., Hill, S. K., & Dean. R. S. (2007). Evidence of construct similarity in executive functions and fluid reasoning abilities. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(6), 735748.
  • Della Toffalo, D. (2010). Linking school neuropsychology with response-to-intervention models. In D. C. Miller (Ed.), Best practices in school neuropsychology: Guidelines for effective practice, assessment, and evidence-based interventions (pp. 159184). New York: Guilford.
  • Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Programs Memo: A Response to Intervention process cannot be used to delay-deny an evaluation for eligiblity under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Jan 21, 2011.
  • Deno, E. (1970). Forum: Special Education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37(3), 229237.
  • Dixon, S. G., Eusebio, E. C., Turton, W. J., Wright, P. W., & Hale, J. B. (2010). Forest Grove School District v. T.A. Supreme Court Case: Implications for school psychology practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 103113. doi:10.1177/0734282910388598, 1–11.
  • Dixon, S. G., Eusebio, E. C., Turton, W. J., Wright, P. W. D., & Hale. J. B. (2011). Forest Grove School District v. T.A. Supreme Court case: Implications for school psychology practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(T.A. Supreme Court case: Implications for school psychology practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment), 103113. doi:10.1177/0734282910388598
  • Dowhower. S. L. (1989). Repeated reading: Research into practice. The Reading Teacher, 502507.
  • Feifer. S. G. (2008). Integrating response to intervention (RTI) with neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. Psychology in the Schools,45(9), 812825.
  • Feifer, S. G., De Fina, P. A., Tressler, C. L., & Lanham-Brower. S. J. (2005). The neuropsychology of mathematics: Diagnosis and intervention. School Neuropsych Press.
  • Feifer, S. G., & Della Toffalo, D. A. (2007). Integrating RTI with cognitive neuropsychology: A scientific approach to reading. School Neuropsych Press.
  • Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., Decker, S. L., & Coleman, S. (2009). Neuropsychology in school psychology. In E. Garcia-Vazquez, T. D. Crespi, & C. A. Riccio (Eds.), Handbook of education, training, and supervision of school psychologists in school and community (Vol. 1, pp. 213232). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., & Wycoff. K. L. (2012). Cognitive hypothesis testing: Linking test results in the real world. In D. P. Flanagan & P. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.) (pp. 484496). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Alfonso, V. C. (Eds.), (2011). Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2011). A CHC-based operational definition of SLD: Integrating multiple data sources and multiple data-gathering methods. In D. P. Flanagan & V. C. Alfonso (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 233298). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), (2012). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.), New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), (2012). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of Cross-Battery assessment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2012). The Cross-Battery assessment approach: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison, Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 151179). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment, third edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. T. (2006). Achievement test desk reference: A guide to learning disability identification (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, R. G., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention (pp. 3). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Fletcher-Janzen, E., & Reynolds. C. R. (2008). Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for diagnosis and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Floyd, R. G., McGrew, K. S., & Evans, J. J. (2008). The relative contributions of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities in explaining writing achievement during childhood and adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 132144.
  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., Lipsey, M. W., & Roberts. P. H. (2001). Is “Learning Disabilities” Just a Fancy Term for Low Achievement? A Meta-Analysis of Reading Differences between Low Achievers with and without the Label. Executive Summary.
  • Fuchs, D., Hale, J. B., & Kearns. D. M. (2011). On the importance of a cognitive processing perspective: An introduction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(Journal of Learning Disabilities), 99104. doi:10.1177/0022219411400019
  • Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., & McDermott. P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. The Journal of Special Education, 40(The Journal of Special Education), 103114.
  • Goodman, G., & Webb. M. A. (2006). Reading disability referrals: Teacher bias and other factors that impact response to intervention. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4(Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal), 5970.
  • Gresham. F. M. (1986). Conceptual issues in the assessment of social competence in children. In P. Strain, M. Guralink, & H. Walker (Eds.), Children's social behavior: Development, assessment, and modification (pp. 143186). New York: Academic Press.
  • Hale, J., Alfonso, V., Berninger, V., Bracken, B., Christo, C., Clark, E., & Yalof, J. (2010b). Critical issues in response-to-intervention, comprehensive evaluation, and specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: An expert white paper consensus. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(3), 223236.
  • Hale J. B. (2006). Implementing IDEA with a three-tier model that includes response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. School Psychology Forum: Research and Practice, 1, 1627.
  • Hale, J. B., & Fiorello. C. A. (2004). School neuropsychology: A practitioner.s handbook. New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Kavanagh, J. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Aloe. A. M. (2007). Is the demise of IQ interpretation justified? A response to special issue authors. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 3751.
  • Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., & Thompson, R. (2010a). Integrating neuropsychological principles with response to intervention for comprehensive school-based practice. In E. R. Arzubi, & E. Mambrino (Eds.), A guide to neuropsychological testing for health care professionals (pp. 229261). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Hale, J. B., Flanagan, D. P., & Naglieri. J. A. (2008). Alternative research-based methods for IDEA (2004) identification of children with specific learning disabilities. Communique, 36(Communique), 1417.
  • Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J. A., & Kavale. K. A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753770. doi:10.1002/pits.20186
  • Hale, J. B., Wycoff, K. L., & Fiorello. C. A. (2010a). RTI and cognitive hypothesis testing for identification and intervention of specific learning disabilities: The best of both worlds. In D. Flanagan & V. Alfonso (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Hale J. B., Wycoff K. L., & Fiorello, C. A. (2010b). RTI and cognitive hypothesis testing for specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: The best of both worlds. Essentials of specific learning disability identification, 173202.
  • Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning. D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12, F1-F7. doi:10.1111/j.1467–7687.2009.00848.x
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), P. L. N., 118 Stat 2647. (2004).
  • Kavale, K. A., Fuchs, D., & Scruggs. T. E. (1994). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: Implications for policymaking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(Learning Disabilities Research & Practice), 7077.
  • Klingberg T., Fernell E., Olesen P. J., Johnson M., Gustafsson P., Dahlström K., Gillberg C. G., Forssberg H., & Westerberg H. (2005). Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD—a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 44, 177186.
  • Klingberg T., Forssberg H., & Westerberg H. (2002). Training of working memory in children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 781791.
  • Lezak, M. D. (1988). IQ: R. I. P. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 351361.
  • Machek, G. R., & Nelson. J. M. (2010). School psychologists. perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 47(perceptions regarding the practice of identifying reading disabilities: Cognitive assessment and response to intervention considerations. Psychology in the Schools), 230245. doi:10.1002/pits.20467
  • Macmillan, D. L., & Hendrick. I. G. (1993). Evolution and legacies. Integrating general and special education, 2348.
  • Maricle, D., Miller, D., Hale, B., & Johnson, W. (2012). Let's not lose sight of the importance of the biological bases of behavior. Trainers Forum, 31/(1).
  • Mascolo, J. T., Flanagan, D. P., & Alfonso. V. C. (Eds.), (2013). Essentials of planning,selecting, and tailoring intervention for the unique learner. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Manuscript in preparation.
  • McCloskey, G., Whitaker, J., Murphy, R., & Rogers, J. (2012). Intellectual, cognitive, and neuropsychological assessment in three-tier service delivery systems in schools. In D. P. Flanagan and P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests and issues (3rd ed.) (pp. 852881). New York: Guilford Press.
  • McGrew, K. S. (1994). Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability-Revised. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). Intelligence test desk reference (ITDR). The Gf-Gc Cross-Battery assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • McGrew, K. S., & Wendling. B. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research? Psychology in the Schools, 47, 651675.
  • Meredith, B., & Underwood, J. (1995). Irreconcilable differences-defining the rising conflict between Regular and Special Education. Journal of Learning & Education, 24,195.
  • Miller D. C. (Ed.), (2009). Best practices in school neuropsychology: Guidelines for effective practice, assessment and evidence-based interventions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Msall, M. E., Avery, R. C., Tremont, M. R., Lima, J. C., Rogers, M. L., & Hogan. D. P. (2003). Functional disability and school activity limitations in 41,300 school-age children: relationship to medical impairments. Pediatrics, 111 (3), 548553.
  • Naglieri. J. A. (2011). The discrepancy/consistency approach to SLD identification using the PASS theory. Essentials of specific learning disability identification, 145172.
  • Pasternak, R. H. (2002, June). The demise of IQ testing for children with learning disabiliteis. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
  • Pickering, S. J., & Gathercole. S. E. (2004). Distinctive working memory profiles in children with special educational needs. Educational Psychology, 24(Educational Psychology), 393408.
  • Powers, K., Hagans, K., & Busse, R. T. (2008). Schol psychologists as instructional consultants in a response-to-intervention model. California School Psychologists, 13, 453.
  • Rashotte, C. A., & Torgesen J. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 180188.
  • Rasinski T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. The Journal of Educational Research, 147150.
  • Reiff-Eldridge, R., Heffner, C. R., Ephross, S. A., Tennis, P. S., White, A. D., & Andrews. E. B. (2000). Monitoring pregnancy outcomes after prenatal drug exposure through prospective pregnancy registries: a pharmaceutical company commitment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 182(American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology), 159163.
  • Reschly, D. (2000). The present and future status of school psychology in the United States. School Psychology Review, 29, 507522.
  • Reschly, D., & Grimes, J. (2002). Best practices in intellectual assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 763773). Washington DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2002). Paradigm shift: The past is not the future. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, pp. 320). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Reynolds, C. R., & Shaywitz. S. E. (2009). Response to Intervention: Ready or Not? Or, From Wait-to-Fail to Watch-Them-Fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(School Psychology Quarterly), 130145.
  • Roberts M. Y., & Kaiser A. P. (2011). The effectiveness of parent-implemented language interventions: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 180199. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0055)
  • Rosen C. L. (1966). An experimental study of visual perceptual training and reading achievement in first grade. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 22, 979986. doi:10.2466/pms.1966.22.3.979
  • Rutter, M., & Yule, W. (1975). The concept of specific reading retardation. British Joumal ofEducational Psychology, 37, 252255.
  • Sattler. J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations. San Diego, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher. Inc.
  • Seungsoo, Y., Fearrington, J. Y., & Christ, T. J. (2011). Relation between CBM-R and CBM-mR Slopes: An application of latent growth modeling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, x, 112. doi:10.1177/1534508411420129
  • Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz. B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57(Biological Psychiatry), 13011309.
  • Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Blachman, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski. . . Gore, J. C. (2004). Development of left occipitotemporal systems for skilled reading in children after a phonologically-based intervention. Biological Psychiatry, 55(9), 926933. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.12.019
  • Shepard. M. J. (Interviewee). (2008). Agora: The Marketplace of Ideas. Best Practices: Applying Response to Intervention (RTI) and Comprehensive Assessment for the Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities [6-hour training program/DVD. Pearson].
  • Shea D. L., Lubinski D., & Benbow C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 604.
  • Shimabukuro, S. M., Prater, M. A., Jenkins, A., & Edelen-Smith, P. (1999). The effects of self-monitoring of academic performance on students with learning disabilities and ADD/ADHD. Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 397414.
  • Simos P. G., Fletcher J. M., Sarkari S., Billingsley R. L., Denton C., & Papanicolaou A. C. (2007). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology, 21, 485496.
  • Speece D. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 487493.
  • Stanovich. K. E. (2005). The future of a mistake: Will discrepancy measurement continue to make the learning disabilities field a pseudoscience? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 103106.
  • Thorell L. B., Lindqvist S., Nutley S. B., Bohlin G., & Klingber T. (2009). Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Developmental Science, 12, 106113.
  • Tilly, W. D. (2002). Best practices in school psychology as a problem-solving enterprise. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 2136). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Tran, L., Sanchez, T., Arellano, B., & Swanson, H. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 283295.
  • Uttal D. H., Meadow N. G., Tipton E., Hand L. L., Alden A. R., Warren C., & Newcombe N. S. (2012). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/a0028446.
  • Vanderwood, M. L., McGrew, K. S., Flanagan, D. P., & Keith. T. Z. (2002). The contribution of general and specific cognitive abilities to reading achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 159188.
  • Wallach G. (2007). Language intervention for school-age students: Setting goals for academic success. Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby.
  • Watkins, M. W., Lei, P., & Canivez. G. L. (2006). Psychometric intelligence and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Intelligence, 35(Intelligence), 5968.
  • Westerberg H., Hirvikoski T., Forssberg H., & Klingberg, T. (2010). Visuo-spatial working memory span: A sensitive measure of cognitive deficits in children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 10(3), 155161.
  • Woodcock. R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8(Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment), 231258.
  • Yeo S., Fearrington J. Y., & Christ T. J. (2012). Relation Between CBM-R and CBM-mR Slopes An Application of Latent Growth Modeling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 37(3), 147158.
  • Ysseldyke, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (1983). LD or ot LD: That's not the question! Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 2931.
  • Ysseldyke, J., Dawson, P., Lehr, C., Reschly, D. J., Reynolds, M., & Telzrow, C. (1997). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice II. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas. L. B. (2010). State laws and guidelines for implementing RTI. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(Teaching Exceptional Children), 6073.