SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi: 10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1016/1061-7361(95)90041-1
  • Carroll, J. B. (1997). Three-stratum theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 5391). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1941). Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 38, 592.
  • Chen, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between and understanding of toddlers and other children's thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65, 16. doi:10.1111/1540-5834.00074
    Direct Link:
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Oxford, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Elliott, C. D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales (DAS). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. doi:10.1177/073428299000800313
  • Elliott, C. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales-Second Edition (DAS-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Flanagan, D. P., Fiorello, C. A., & Ortiz, S. O. (2010). Enhancing practice through application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and research: A “third method” approach to specific learning disability identification. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 739760. doi: 10.1002/pits.20501
  • Flanagan, D. P., Mascolo, J. T., & Genshaft, J. L. (2000). A conceptual framework for interpreting preschool intelligence tests. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (pp. 428473). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1995). The field of intellectual assessment: A current perspective. The School Psychologist, 47, 714.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1997). A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and cognitive science. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories tests, and issues (pp. 314325). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1998). Interpreting intelligence tests from modern Gf-Gc theory: Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the WJ-R and Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT). Journal of School Psychology, 36, 151182. doi: org/10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00003-X
  • Flanagan, D. P., McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler intelligence scales and Gf-Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Flanagan, D. P., & Ortiz, S. O. (2001). Essentials of cross-battery assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., Taub, G. E., & McGrew, K. S. (2007). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: g had indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 200233. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.200
  • Floyd, R. G., McGrew, K. S., Barry, A., Rafael, F., & Rogers, J. (2009). General and specific effects on Cattell-Horn-Carroll broad ability compositions: Analysis of the Woodcock-Johnson III normative update Cattell-Horn-Carroll factor clusters across development. School Psychology Review, 38, 249265.
  • Ford, L., & Dahinten, V. S. (2005). Use of intelligence tests in the assessment of preschoolers. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 487503). New York NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Fuchs, D., Deshler, D. D., & Reschly, D. J. (2004). National research center on learning disabilities: Multimethod studies of identification and classification issues. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 189195. doi:10.2307/1593672
  • Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 216227. doi:10.2307/1593674
  • Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P., & Young, C. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 157171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00072
  • Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J. A., & Kavale, K. A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753770. doi:10.1002/pits.20186
  • Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of abilities and the development of intelligence. Psychological Review, 75, 242259. doi: 10.1037/h0025662
  • Horn, J. L. (1985). Remolding old models of intelligence: Gf-Gc theory. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267300). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Horn, J. L. (1991). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson technical manual (pp. 197232). Chicago: Riverside.
  • Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed.), (pp. 136181). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structure Equation Modeling, 6, 155. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hunt, M. S. (2008). A Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition, and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities, Third Edition, with preschool children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(11-A), 4605.
  • Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No.108446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
  • Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401415.
  • Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligence testing with the WISC-R. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children—Second edition (KABC-II). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Kavale, K. A., Holdnack, J. A., & Mostert, M. P. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 29, 113127. doi:10.2307/30035539
  • Keith, T. Z. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In P. D. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373402). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Keith, T. Z., Kranzler, J. H., & Flanagan, D. P. (2001). What does the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) measure? Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the CAS and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability, Third Edition. School Psychology Review, 30, 89119.
  • Kelley, M. F., & Surbeck, E. (2000). History of preschool assessment. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (3rd ed., pp. 118). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structured analysis (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In P. D. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151182). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed., pp. 136181). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference: Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00003-X
  • McGrew, K. S., Keith, T. A., Flanagan, D. P., & Vanderwood, M. (1997). Beyond g: The impact of Gf-Gc specific cognitive abilities research on future use and interpretation of intelligence tests in schools. School Psychology Review, 26, 189210.
  • McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  • Morgan, K. E. (2008). Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the Standard-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition in preschool children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana.
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user's guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
  • Reynolds, M. R., Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Fisher, M. E., & Low, J. A. (2007). Confirmatory factor structure of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children – Second Edition: Consistency with Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 511539. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.511
  • Roid, G. H. (2003a). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, examiner's manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Roid, G. H. (2003b). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition, interpretive manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
  • Roid, G. H., Shaughnessy, M. F., & Greathouse, D. (2005). An interview with Gale Roid about the Stanford-Binet 5. North American Journal of Psychology, 7, 493504.
  • Sanders, S., McIntosh, D. E., Dunham, M., Rothlisberg, B. A., & Finch, H. (2007). Joint confirmatory factor analysis of the Differential Ability Scales and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities-Third Edition. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 119138. doi:10.1002/pits.20211
  • Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Taub, G. E., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., & McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 197198. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187
  • Teague, T. L. (1999). Joint factor-analytic investigation of the Differential Ability Scales and the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities—Third Edition with preschool age children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, Columbia.
  • Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 519.
  • Tusing, M. E., & Ford, L. (2004). Examining preschool cognitive abilities using a CHC framework. International Journal of Testing, 4, 91114. doi:10.1207/s15327574ijt0402_1
  • Tusing, M. E., Maricle, D., & Ford, L. (2003). Assessment with the Woodcock-Johnson III and young children. In F. A. Schrank & D. P. Glanagan (Eds.), WJIII clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 243283). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-012628982-4/50009-X
  • Woodcock, R. W. (1990). The theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231258. doi:10.1177/073428299000800303
  • Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing. doi:10.1016/B978-012058570-0/50007-0