SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (1998). Critical realism. London, England: Routledge.
  • ATLAS.ti Software Development. (2004). ATLAS.ti. Berlin, Germany: Scientific Software Development. Retrieved from www.atlas.ti.com
  • Aubry, M., & Hobbs, B. (2011). A fresh look at the contribution of project management to organizational performance. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 316.
  • Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Müller, R., & Blomquist, T. (2010). Identifying forces driving PMOs changes. Project Management Journal, 41(4), 3045.
  • Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Müller, R., & Blomquist, T. (2011). Identifying the forces driving the frequent changes in PMOs. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • Aubry, M., & Lièvre, P. (2010). Ambidexterity as a competence of project leaders: A case study from two polar expeditions. Project Management Journal, 41(3), 3244.
  • Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. The Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 2939.
  • Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock Publications Limited.
  • Crawford, K. J. (2010). The strategic project office (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Crawford, L. H. (2010, May). Deconstructing the PMO. Paper presented at the EURAM, Rome. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Dai, C. X., & Wells, W. G. (2004). An exploration of project management office features and their relationship to project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 523532.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532550.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 2532.
  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publications.
  • Graham, D. J., & Midgley, N. G. (2000). Graphical representation of particle shape using triangular diagrams: An Excel spreadsheet method. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25(13), 14731477.
  • Hobbs, B., & Aubry, M. (2008). An empirically grounded search for a typology of project management offices. Project Management Journal, 39(Supplement), S69S82.
  • Hobbs, B., & Aubry, M. (2010). The project management office or PMO: A quest for understanding. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • Hobbs, B., Aubry, M., & Thuillier, D. (2008). The project management office as an organisational innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 547555.
  • Huemann, M. (2010). Considering human resource management when developing a project-oriented company: Case study of a telecommunication company. International Journal of Project Management, 28(4), 361369.
  • Hurt, M., & Thomas, J. L. (2009). Building value through sustainable project management offices. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 5572.
  • Keegan, A. E., & Turner, J. R. (2002). The management of innovation in project-based firms. Long Range Planning, 35, 367388.
  • Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. London, England: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kulvik, I., Poskela, J., Turkulainen, V., & Artto, K. (2010, May). The ambiguous role of PMO in the management of front end of innovation projects. Paper presented at the EURAM, Rome.
  • Kwak, Y. H., & Ibbs, C. W. (2000). Calculating project management's return on investment. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 3847.
  • Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691710.
  • Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. “x-efficiency.” The American Economic Review, 56(3), 392415.
  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95112.
  • Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 437455.
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 7187.
  • Maylor, H., Brady, T., Cooke-Davies, T., & Hodgson, D. (2006). From projectification to programmification. International Journal of Project Management, 24(8), 663674.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 12451264.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1977). The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(1), 95113.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25(9), 833848.
  • Patterson, L., Urban, M., Myers, A., Bhaduri, B., Bright, E., & Coleman, P. (2007). Assessing spatial and attribute errors in large national datasets for population distribution models: A case study of Philadelphia County schools. GeoJournal, 69(1), 93102.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Pellegrinelli, S., & Garagna, L. (2009). Towards a conceptualisation of PMOs as agents and subjects of change and renewal. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 649656.
  • Plewe, B., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2001). The use of weighted ternary histograms for the visualization of segregation. Professional Geographer, 53(3), 347360.
  • Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
  • Preusser, H. (1976). Entwicklung und räumliche Differenzierung der Bevölkerung Islands [The development and spatial differentiation of the population of Iceland]. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 58(2), 116144.
  • Project Management Institute. (2008). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide)Fourth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.
  • Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363.
  • Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London, England: Sage Publications.
  • Szulanski, G. (2003). Sticky knowledge: Barriers to knowing in the firm. London, England: Sage Publications.
  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in Social & behavioral research (2nd ed.; pp. 144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. E. (1999). The versatile project-based organization: Governance and operational control. European Management Journal, 17(3), 296309.
  • Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. E. (2001). Mechanisms of governance in the project-based organization: Roles of the broker and steward. European Management Journal, 19(3), 245267.
  • Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. E. (2004). Managing technology: Innovation, learning, and maturity. In P. W. G. Morris & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The Wiley guide to managing projects (pp. 567590). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Turner, J. R., & Müller, R. (2003). On the nature of the project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21(1), 17.
  • Williams, T. (2007). Post-project reviews to gain effective lessons learned. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
  • Winch, G. M., Meunier, M.-C., & Head, J. (2010, May). Projects as the content and process of change: The case of the Health and Safety Laboratory. Paper presented at the EURAM 2010, Rome.
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.