Paper
Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial
Article first published online: 23 MAR 2007
DOI: 10.1002/pon.1185
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Kissane, D. W., Grabsch, B., Clarke, D. M., Smith, G. C., Love, A. W., Bloch, S., Snyder, R. D. and Li, Y. (2007), Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology, 16: 277–286. doi: 10.1002/pon.1185
Publication History
- Issue published online: 23 MAR 2007
- Article first published online: 23 MAR 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 27 JAN 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 26 JAN 2007
- Manuscript Received: 26 OCT 2006
Funded by
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
- Cancer Council of Victoria
- Kathleen Cuningham Foundation
- National Breast Cancer Foundation of Australia
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- breast cancer;
- group therapy;
- survival;
- depression;
- psychosocial outcome
Abstract
Background: Mixed reports exist about the impact of supportive-expressive group therapy (SEGT) on survival.
Methods: From 485 women with advanced breast cancer recruited between 1996–2002, 227 (47%) consented and were randomized within an average 10 months of cancer recurrence in a 2:1 ratio to intervention with 1 year or more of weekly SEGT plus three classes of relaxation therapy (147 women) or to control receiving three classes of relaxation therapy (80 women). The primary outcome was survival; psychosocial well-being was appraised secondarily. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.
Results: SEGT did not prolong survival (median survival 24.0 months in SEGT and 18.3 in controls; univariate hazard ratio for death 0.92 [95% CI, 0.69–1.26]; multivariate hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.74–1.51]). Significant predictors of survival were treatment with chemotherapy and hormone therapy (p<0.001), visceral metastases (p<0.001) and advanced disease at first diagnosis (p<0.05). SEGT ameliorated and prevented new DSM-IV depressive disorders (p = 0.002), reduced hopeless–helplessness (p = 0.004), trauma symptoms (p = 0.04) and improved social functioning (p = 0.03).
Conclusions: SEGT did not prolong survival. It improved quality of life, including treatment of and protection against depression. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1611/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=495cce3def021d1c317c4add3b6f450b635c4cfa)
1099-1611/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=523356b02e7cdce48ac0328fa475077a040a220f)