Paper
Assessing the psychological predictors of benefit finding in patients with head and neck cancer
Article first published online: 14 SEP 2011
DOI: 10.1002/pon.2065
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Llewellyn, C. D., Horney, D. J., McGurk, M., Weinman, J., Herold, J., Altman, K. and Smith, H. E. (2013), Assessing the psychological predictors of benefit finding in patients with head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 22: 97–105. doi: 10.1002/pon.2065
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 JAN 2013
- Article first published online: 14 SEP 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 7 JUL 2011
- Manuscript Received: 22 FEB 2011
Funded by
- Cancer Research UK. Grant Number: C24857/A8586
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cancer;
- oncology;
- benefit finding;
- adaptation;
- coping;
- optimism
Abstract
Background
Some individuals are able to gain psychological benefits from illness and adversity, such as a greater sense of purpose and closer relationships, termed ‘benefit finding’ (BF). The main aim of this study was to explore the extent to which BF is reported in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Secondary aims were to establish the relationships between BF, other patient-reported outcomes and predictive factors such as coping strategy and level of optimism.
Methods
This repeat measures study was conducted with 103 newly diagnosed patients with HNC. Self-completion questionnaires were used to assess BF pre-treatment and 6 months after treatment and pre-treatment coping, optimism, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Sixty-eight patients (66%) completed follow-ups.
Results
Moderate to high levels of BF were reported. Anxiety, depression and quality of life were not related to BF. Regression models of BF total score and three new factor analysed BF scales indicated that use of emotional support and active coping strategies were predictive of finding more positive consequences. Optimism, living with a partner and higher educational attainment were also found to have a protective effect. The amount of variance in BF explained by these five pre-treatment factors ranged from 32 to 46%.
Conclusions
These findings demonstrate that both dispositional and potentially modifiable factors, in particular optimism and coping strategies, were associated with patients identifying positive consequences of a diagnosis of HNC. To maximise patient's longer-term resilience and adaptation, components of BF, either directly or via coping strategies, could be targeted for intervention. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-1611/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=495cce3def021d1c317c4add3b6f450b635c4cfa)
