Get access

Low socioeconomic status and mental health outcomes in colorectal cancer survivors: disadvantage? advantage? … or both?

Authors

  • Michael A. Andrykowski,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
    • Correspondence to: Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA. E-mail: mandry@uky.edu

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Mieke J. Aarts,

    1. Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse,

    1. Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    2. Center for Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Floortje Mols,

    1. Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    2. Center for Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gerrit D. Slooter,

    1. Department of Surgery, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Melissa S.Y. Thong

    1. Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    2. Center for Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and both positive and negative mental health (MH) outcomes in a population-based sample of colorectal cancer survivors. On the basis of theoretical conceptualizations of trauma and posttraumatic growth, low SES was hypothesized to be positively associated with both greater negative MH outcomes (e.g., distress) and greater positive MH outcomes (e.g., growth).

Methods

Colorectal cancer survivors (n = 1300; 57% male; mean age 69.4 and 4.0 years post-diagnosis) were recruited using a regional, population-based cancer registry in the Netherlands and completed a questionnaire assessing current negative and positive MH outcomes. Low, medium, and high SES respondents were identified using an area-level indicator of SES based on aggregated individual fiscal data on monetary home value and household income.

Results

Analysis of covariance and logistic regression analyses indicated that low SES was a risk factor for greater negative MH outcomes. Relative to high SES survivors, low SES survivors reported poorer status on nine indices of MH, and high SES survivors were about 50% less likely to report clinically important levels of anxiety and depression. Results provided partial support for the hypothesis low SES was a ‘risk’ factor for greater positive MH outcomes. Relative to high SES survivors, low SES survivors reported greater positive MH outcomes on 2 of 5 positive MH indices examined (Positive Self-Evaluation, Meaning of Cancer).

Conclusions

Study findings are the first to suggest that low SES might increase the likelihood of both greater negative as well as positive MH outcomes in cancer survivors. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ancillary