From the European Kidney and Urine Proteomics (EuroKUP) Consortium.
Research Article
Comprehensive human urine standards for comparability and standardization in clinical proteome analysis
Article first published online: 3 FEB 2010
DOI: 10.1002/prca.200900189
Copyright © 2010 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Issue

PROTEOMICS - Clinical Applications
Special Issue: Liver Proteomics
Volume 4, Issue 4, pages 464–478, April 2010
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mischak, H., Kolch, W., Aivaliotis, M., Bouyssié, D., Court, M., Dihazi, H., Dihazi, G. H., Franke, J., Garin, J., de Peredo, A. G., Iphöfer, A., Jänsch, L., Lacroix, C., Makridakis, M., Masselon, C., Metzger, J., Monsarrat, B., Mrug, M., Norling, M., Novak, J., Pich, A., Pitt, A., Bongcam-Rudloff, E., Siwy, J., Suzuki, H., Thongboonkerd, V., Wang, L.-S., Zoidakis, J., Zürbig, P., Schanstra, J. P. and Vlahou, A. (2010), Comprehensive human urine standards for comparability and standardization in clinical proteome analysis. Prot. Clin. Appl., 4: 464–478. doi: 10.1002/prca.200900189
Publication History
- Issue published online: 26 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 3 FEB 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 DEC 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 20 NOV 2009
- Manuscript Received: 23 SEP 2009
Funded by
- European Union through InGenious HyperCare. Grant Number: LSHM-C7-2006-037093
- EuroKUP COST Action. Grant Number: BM0702
- Agence Nationale pour la Recherche. Grant Number: ANR-07-PHYSIO-004-01
- NIH grants. Grant Numbers: DK075868, DK078244
Keywords:
- Clinical proteomics;
- Proteome;
- Standard;
- Urine
Abstract
Purpose: Urine proteomics is emerging as a powerful tool for biomarker discovery. The purpose of this study is the development of a well-characterized “real life” sample that can be used as reference standard in urine clinical proteomics studies.
Experimental design: We report on the generation of male and female urine samples that are extensively characterized by different platforms and methods (CE-MS, LC-MS, LC-MS/MS, 1-D gel analysis in combination with nano-LC MS/MS (using LTQ-FT ultra), and 2-DE-MS) for their proteome and peptidome. In several cases analysis involved a definition of the actual biochemical entities, i.e. proteins/peptides associated with molecular mass and detected PTMs and the relative abundance of these compounds.
Results: The combination of different technologies allowed coverage of a wide mass range revealing the advantages and complementarities of the different technologies. Application of these samples in “inter-laboratory” and “inter-platform” data comparison is also demonstrated.
Conclusions and clinical relevance: These well-characterized urine samples are freely available upon request to enable data comparison especially in the context of biomarker discovery and validation studies. It is also expected that they will provide the basis for the comprehensive characterization of the urinary proteome.

1862-8354/asset/olbannerleft.jpg?v=1&s=47a2691c51f9d6e6d83bcad52a29869e7c0a62ec)