Inositol phosphate-induced stabilization of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase and its role in substrate specificity

Authors

  • Varin Gosein,

    1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3G 1Y6
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ting-Fung Leung,

    1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3G 1Y6
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Oren Krajden,

    1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3G 1Y6
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Gregory J. Miller

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, H3G 1Y6
    2. Groupe de Recherche Axé sur la Structure des Protéines, McGill University, Montréal, Québec H3G 0B1, Canada
    3. Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, 20064
    • Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, 20064
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Inositol phosphate kinases (IPKs) sequentially phosphorylate inositol phosphates (IPs) on their inositol rings to yield an array of signaling molecules. IPKs must possess the ability to recognize their physiological substrates from among a pool of over 30 cellular IPs that differ in numbers and positions of phosphates. Crystal structures from IPK subfamilies have revealed structural determinants for IP discrimination, which vary considerably between IPKs. However, recent structures of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPK1) did not reveal how IPK1 selectively recognizes its physiological substrate, IP5, while excluding others. Here, we report that limited proteolysis has revealed the presence of multiple conformational states in the IPK1 catalytic cycle, with notable protection from protease only in the presence of IP. Further, a 3.1-Å crystal structure of IPK1 bound to ADP in the absence of IP revealed decreased order in residues 110–140 within the N-lobe of the kinase compared with structures in which IP is bound. Using this solution and crystallographic data, we propose a model for recognition of IP substrate by IPK1 wherein phosphate groups at the 4-, 5-, and 6-positions are recognized initially by the C-lobe with subsequent interaction of the 1-position phosphate by Arg130 that stabilizes this residue and the N-lobe. This model explains how IPK1 can be highly specific for a single IP substrate by linking its interactions with substrate phosphate groups to the stabilization of the N- and C-lobes and kinase activation.

Ancillary