Physical–chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins

doi:10.1002/pro.399

Accelerated Communication

You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Physical–chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins

Lauren L. Perskie,
George D. Rose^*

Article first published online: 13 APR 2010

DOI: 10.1002/pro.399

Issue

Protein Science

Volume 19, Issue 6, pages 1127–1136, June 2010

Additional Information

How to Cite

Perskie, L. L. and Rose, G. D. (2010), Physical–chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins. Protein Science, 19: 1127–1136. doi: 10.1002/pro.399

Author Information

T.C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21218

Email: George D. Rose (grose@jhu.edu)

^*Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218

Publication History

Issue published online: 24 MAY 2010
Article first published online: 13 APR 2010
Manuscript Accepted: 1 APR 2010
Manuscript Revised: 31 MAR 2010
Manuscript Received: 2 MAR 2010

Funded by

Mathers Foundation

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (165K)

References

1
Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, Clarke ND ( 2007) Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 69; Suppl 8: 57–67.
Direct Link:
2
Jones TA, Thirup S ( 1986) Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J 5: 819–822.
3
Unger R, Harel D, Wherland S, Sussman JL ( 1989) A 3D building blocks approach to analyzing and predicting structure of proteins. Proteins 5: 355–373.
Direct Link:
4
Bystroff C, Baker D ( 1998) Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 281: 565–577.
5
Hunter CG, Subramaniam S ( 2003) Protein fragment clustering and canonical local shapes. Proteins 50: 580–588.
Direct Link:
6
Sims GE, Choi IG, Kim SH ( 2005) Protein conformational space in higher order phi-Psi maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 618–621.
7
de Brevern AG, Etchebest C, Hazout S ( 2000) Bayesian probabilistic approach for predicting backbone structures in terms of protein blocks. Proteins 41: 271–287.
Direct Link:
8
Fitzkee NC, Fleming PJ, Gong H, Panasik N,Jr, Street TO, Rose GD ( 2005) Are proteins made from a limited parts list? Trends Biochem Sci 30: 73–80.
9
Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D ( 2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383: 66–93.
10
Gong H, Fleming PJ, Rose GD ( 2005) Building native protein conformation from highly approximate backbone torsion angles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 16227–16232.
11
Budowski-Tal I, Nov Y, Kolodny R ( 2010) FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 3481–3486.
12
Samson AO, Levitt M ( 2009) Protein segment finder: an online search engine for segment motifs in the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D224–D228.
13
Srinivasan R, Rose GD ( 1999) A physical basis for protein secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 14258–14263.
14
Voelz VA, Shell MS, Dill KA ( 2009) Predicting peptide structures in native proteins from physical simulations of fragments. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000281.
15
Fitzkee NC, Fleming PJ, Rose GD ( 2005) The Protein Coil Library: a structural database of nonhelix, nonstrand fragments derived from the PDB. Proteins 58: 852–854.
Direct Link:
16
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE ( 2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235–242.
17
Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E ( 1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21: 1087–1092.
18
Panasik N, Jr, Fleming PJ, Rose GD ( 2005) Hydrogen-bonded turns in proteins: the case for a recount. Protein Sci 14: 2910–2914.
Direct Link:
19
Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC ( 2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40: 389–408.
Direct Link:
20
Rose GD, Gierasch LM, Smith JA ( 1985) Turns in peptides and proteins. Adv Protein Chem 37: 1–109.
21
Fitzkee NC, Rose GD ( 2005) Sterics and solvation winnow accessible conformational space for unfolded proteins. J Mol Biol 353: 873–887.
22
Pappu RV, Rose GD ( 2002) A simple model for polyproline II structure in unfolded states of alanine-based peptides. Protein Sci 11: 2437–2455.
Direct Link:
23
Fleming PJ, Rose GD ( 2005) Do all backbone polar groups in proteins form hydrogen bonds? Protein Sci 14: 1911–1917.
Direct Link:
24
Rose GD, Fleming PJ, Banavar JR, Maritan A ( 2006) A backbone-based theory of protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 16623–16633.
25
Uversky VN, Fink AL ( 2002) The chicken-egg scenario of protein folding revisited. FEBS Lett 515: 79–83.
26
Holthauzen LM, Rosgen J, Bolen DW ( 2010) Hydrogen bonding drives contraction of the protein urea-denatured state upon transfer to water and poorer solvents. Biochemistry 49: 1310–1318.
27
Bolen DW, Rose GD ( 2008) Structure and energetics of the hydrogen-bonded backbone in protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 339–362.
28
Shortle D ( 2003) Propensities, probabilities, and the Boltzmann hypothesis. Protein Sci 12: 1298–1302.
Direct Link:
29
Finkelstein AV, Badretdinov A, Gutin AM ( 1995) Why do protein architectures have Boltzmann-like statistics? Proteins 23: 142–150.
Direct Link:
30
DePristo MA, de Bakker PI, Blundell TL ( 2004) Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. Structure 12: 831–838.
31
Wang G, Dunbrack RL,Jr ( 2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19: 1589–1591.
32
Srinivasan R, Fleming PJ, Rose GD ( 2004) Ab initio protein folding using LINUS. Methods Enzymol 383: 48–66.
33
Perskie LL, Street TO, Rose GD ( 2008) Structures, basins, and energies: a deconstruction of the Protein Coil Library. Protein Sci 17: 1151–1161.
Direct Link:
34
Street TO, Fitzkee NC, Perskie LL, Rose GD ( 2007) Physical-chemical determinants of turn conformations in globular proteins. Protein Sci 16: 1720–1727.
Direct Link:
35
Rose GD, Seltzer JP ( 1977) A new algorithm for finding the peptide chain turns in a globular protein. J Mol Biol 113: 153–164.
36
Srinivasan R, Rose GD ( 1995) LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins 22: 81–99.
Direct Link:
37
Kortemme T, Morozov AV, Baker D ( 2003) An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 326: 1239–1259.

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (165K)

JOURNAL TOOLS

JOURNAL MENU

FIND ISSUES

FIND ARTICLES

GET ACCESS

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

ABOUT THIS JOURNAL

SPECIAL FEATURES

Physical–chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins

Protein Science

How to Cite

Author Information

Publication History

Funded by

ARTICLE TOOLS

References

More content like this

JOURNAL TOOLS

JOURNAL MENU

FIND ISSUES

FIND ARTICLES

GET ACCESS

FOR CONTRIBUTORS

ABOUT THIS JOURNAL

SPECIAL FEATURES

Physical–chemical determinants of coil conformations in globular proteins

Protein Science

How to Cite

Author Information

Publication History

Funded by

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

References

More content like this