Original Article
Identification of secreted glycoproteins of human prostate and bladder stromal cells by comparative quantitative proteomics
Article first published online: 15 SEP 2008
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20853
Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Goo, Y. A., Liu, A. Y., Ryu, S., Shaffer, S. A., Malmström, L., Page, L., Nguyen, L. T., Doneanu, C. E. and Goodlett, D. R. (2009), Identification of secreted glycoproteins of human prostate and bladder stromal cells by comparative quantitative proteomics. The Prostate, 69: 49–61. doi: 10.1002/pros.20853
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 NOV 2008
- Article first published online: 15 SEP 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 AUG 2008
- Manuscript Received: 30 MAY 2008
Funded by
- Department of Army Grant. Grant Number: W81XWH-06-1-0108
- National Institutes of Health. Grant Numbers: CA101052, DK63630, CA111244
- UW Ecogenetics and Environmental Health. Grant Number: NIEHS P30ES07033
- NW RCE for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Grant Number: 1U54 AI57141
Keywords:
- bladder;
- prostate;
- stromal cells;
- secreted proteins
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Functional development of the prostate is governed by stromal mesenchyme induction and epithelial response. Stromal/epithelial signaling can be mediated through direct cell–cell contact and diffusible factors and their cell surface receptors. These inducers are likely secreted or membrane-associated extracellular proteins. Given the importance of intercellular communication, it is possible that diseases like cancer could arise from a loss of this communication. One approach to gain a molecular understanding of stromal cells is to identify, as a first step, secreted stromal signaling factors. We proposed to do this by comparative analysis between bladder and prostate.
METHODS
Secreted proteins were identified from cultured normal prostate and bladder stromal mesenchyme cells by glycopeptide-capture method followed by mass spectrometry. Differences in protein abundance between prostate and bladder were quantified from calculated peptide ion current area (PICA) followed by Western validation. Functional and pathway analyses of the proteins were carried out by Gene Ontology (GO) and Teranode software.
RESULTS
This analysis produced a list of 116 prostate and 84 bladder secreted glycoproteins with ProteinProphet probability scores ≥0.9. Stromal proteins upregulated in the prostate include cathepsin L, follistatin-related protein, neuroendocrine convertase, tumor necrosis factor receptor, and others that are known to be involved in signal transduction, extracellular matrix interaction, differentiation and transport.
CONCLUSIONS
We have identified a number of potential proteins for stromal signaling and bladder or prostate differentiation program. The prostate stromal/epithelial signaling may be accomplished through activation of the ECM–receptor interaction, complement and coagulation cascades, focal adhesion and cell adhesion pathways. Prostate 69: 49–61, 2009. © 2008 Wiley–Liss, Inc.

1097-0045/asset/PROS_centre.gif?v=1&s=a32c0a233beb1a9c2871949185de4c172dac92bc)
1097-0045/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fe259d14a459bffcaa3c96b2bb2e11e09b2530d0)