Get access

A snapshot of the expression signature of androgen receptor splicing variants and their distinctive transcriptional activities

Authors

  • Rong Hu,

    1. Departments of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • William B. Isaacs,

    1. Departments of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    2. Departments of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jun Luo

    Corresponding author
    1. Departments of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    2. Departments of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Department of Urology, 411 Marburg Building, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287.
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diversity and complexity of the human androgen receptor (AR) splicing variants are well appreciated but not fully understood. The goal of this study is to generate a comprehensive expression signature of AR variants in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and to address the relative importance of the individual variants in conferring the castration-resistant phenotype.

METHODS

A modified RNA amplification method, termed selective linear amplification of sense RNA, was developed to amplify all AR transcripts containing AR exon 3 in CRPC specimens, which were profiled using tiling expression microarrays. Coding sequences for the AR variants were cloned into expression vectors and assessed for their transcriptional activities. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to determine their in vivo expression patterns in an expanded set of clinical specimens.

RESULTS

In addition to expression peaks in AR intron 3, a novel AR exon, termed exon 9, was discovered. Exon 9 was spliced into multiple novel AR variants. Different AR splicing variants were functionally distinctive, with some demonstrating constitutive activity while others were conditionally active. Conditionally active AR-Vs may activate AR signaling depending on the cellular context. Importantly, AR variant functions did not appear to depend on the full-length AR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided the first unbiased snapshot of the AR variant signature consisting of multiple AR variants with distinctive functional properties, directly in CRPC specimens. Study findings suggest that the aggregate function of multiple AR variants may confer a castration-resistant phenotype independent of the full-length AR. Prostate 71:1656–1667, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary