Local motions in a benchmark of allosteric proteins

Authors

  • Michael D. Daily,

    1. Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jeffrey J. Gray

    Corresponding author
    1. Program in Molecular and Computational Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
    2. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
    • 3400 N. Charles Street, 221 Maryland Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Allosteric proteins have been studied extensively in the last 40 years, but so far, no systematic analysis of conformational changes between allosteric structures has been carried out. Here, we compile a set of 51 pairs of known inactive and active allosteric protein structures from the Protein Data Bank. We calculate local conformational differences between the two structures of each protein using simple metrics, such as backbone and side-chain Cartesian displacement, and torsion angle change and rearrangement in residue–residue contacts. Thresholds for each metric arise from distributions of motions in two control sets of pairs of protein structures in the same biochemical state. Statistical analysis of motions in allosteric proteins quantifies the magnitude of allosteric effects and reveals simple structural principles about allostery. For example, allosteric proteins exhibit substantial conformational changes comprising about 20% of the residues. In addition, motions in allosteric proteins show strong bias toward weakly constrained regions such as loops and the protein surface. Correlation functions show that motions communicate through protein structures over distances averaging 10–20 residues in sequence space and 10–20 Å in Cartesian space. Comparison of motions in the allosteric set and a set of 21 nonallosteric ligand-binding proteins shows that nonallosteric proteins also exhibit bias of motion toward weakly constrained regions and local correlation of motion. However, allosteric proteins exhibit twice as much percent motion on average as nonallosteric proteins with ligand-induced motion. These observations may guide efforts to design flexibility and allostery into proteins. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ancillary