Get access

Influence of oligomerization on the dynamics of G-protein coupled receptors as assessed by normal mode analysis

Authors

  • Masha Y. Niv,

    1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Current address: Institute of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Food, and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel

  • Marta Filizola

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York
    2. Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
    • Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, Box 1677, New York, NY 10029-6574
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The recently discovered impact of oligomerization on G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) function further complicates the already challenging goal of unraveling the molecular and dynamic mechanisms of these receptors. To help understand the effect of oligomerization on the dynamics of GPCRs, we have compared the motion of monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric arrangements of the prototypic GPCR rhodopsin, using an approximate—yet powerful—normal mode analysis (NMA) technique termed elastic network model (ENM). Moreover, we have used ENM to discriminate between putative dynamic mechanisms likely to account for the recently observed conformational rearrangement of the TM4,5-TM4,5 dimerization interface of GPCRs that occurs upon activation. Our results indicate: (1) significant perturbation of the normal modes (NMs) of the rhodopsin monomer upon oligomerization, which is mainly manifested at interfacial regions; (2) increased positive correlation among the transmembrane domains (TMs) and between the extracellular loop (EL) and TM regions of the rhodopsin protomer; (3) highest interresidue positive correlation at the interfaces between protomers; and (4) experimentally testable hypotheses of differential motional changes within different putative oligomeric arrangements. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ancillary