Research Article
Geometric constraints for porphyrin binding in helical protein binding sites
Article first published online: 17 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22143
Copyright © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Issue
1097-0134/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=d817e79b67ba6cacf8bdcce1a819c04de300a7e3)
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Volume 74, Issue 2, pages 400–416, 1 February 2009
Additional Information
How to Cite
Negron, C., Fufezan, C. and Koder, R. L. (2009), Geometric constraints for porphyrin binding in helical protein binding sites. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 74: 400–416. doi: 10.1002/prot.22143
Publication History
- Issue published online: 5 DEC 2008
- Article first published online: 17 JUL 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 MAY 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 20 APR 2008
- Manuscript Received: 17 NOV 2007
Funded by
- NIH (MARC). Grant Number: T34 GM007639
- Mellon Mays Foundation and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Keywords:
- heme binding;
- rotamer;
- heme ruffle;
- bionanotechnology, protein design
Abstract
Helical bundles which bind heme and porphyrin cofactors have been popular targets for cofactor-containing de novo protein design. By analyzing a highly nonredundant subset of the protein databank we have determined a rotamer distribution for helical histidines bound to heme cofactors. Analysis of the entire nonredundant database for helical sequence preferences near the ligand histidine demonstrated little preference for amino acid side chain identity, size, or charge. Analysis of the database subdivided by ligand histidine rotamer, however, reveals strong preferences in each case, and computational modeling illuminates the structural basis for some of these findings. The majority of the rotamer distribution matches that predicted by molecular simulation of a single porphyrin-bound histidine residue placed in the center of an all-alanine helix, and the deviations explain two prominent features of natural heme protein binding sites: heme distortion in the case of the cytochromes C in the m166 histidine rotamer, and a highly prevalent glycine residue in the t73 histidine rotamer. These preferences permit derivation of helical consensus sequence templates which predict optimal side chain-cofactor packing interactions for each rotamer. These findings thus promise to guide future design endeavors not only in the creation of higher affinity heme and porphyrin binding sites, but also in the direction of bound cofactor geometry. Proteins 2009. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

1097-0134/asset/PROT_centre.gif?v=1&s=77b56b1f2cdaba74cb3bb149bd9b029cd8803cdb)