SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Originally Published in PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2012;80(2):374–381 (DOI: 10.1002/prot.23188)]

Due to a print error in the originally published version of this article, Table 1 is incorrect as published. The table is correct as shown below:

Table I. Optimal performance of K2D3 with BENCH83 corresponds to “10% size up”. See Figure 2
K2D3 performanceall10% size up
αβαβ
200 to 240 nmr0.8650.640.8770.782
RMSD0.10.1360.1030.108
190 to 240 nmr0.890.640.90.8
RMSD0.0960.1360.0920.102