Improved integration of LOPA with HAZOP analyses


  • Lloyd's Register, its affiliates and subsidiaries and their respective officers, employees, or agents, individually and collectively, are referred to in this clause as the “Lloyd's Register Group of entities.” The Lloyd's Register Group of entities assumes no responsibility and will not be liable to any person for any loss, damage, or expense caused by reliance on the information or advice provided in this document or in any other manner, unless that person has signed a contract with the relevant Lloyd's Register Group entity for the provision of this information or advice, and in that case any responsibility or liability is exclusively on the terms and conditions set out in that contract. Opinions expressed in this document represent the opinions of the authors and not necessarily the position or views of Lloyd's Register Celerity3.


Integrating Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA) with Hazard and Operability Analysis (HAZOP) has many advantages over performing these studies separately. The merits include: fewer actions from the combined effort compared to performing only a HAZOP; team continuity resulting from the combined effort as opposed to two separate teams having possibly differing points of view; and, ultimately, a time and cost savings realized by the combination. This integration defines the risk associated with a given scenario, enabling better decisions that impact business assurance.

By using the Center for Chemical Process Safety guidelines to define the independent protection layers upfront, the gray areas can often be reduced or eliminated; thereby enabling a more thorough LOPA. Examples include taking credit if a unit has two independent operators (outside and inside) responding to critical alarms, or taking credit for centralized control rooms that may allow immediate operator interaction and response.

This article shows how the guidelines have been used successfully in joint HAZOP/LOPA studies, and describes an initial preparation protocol that can ensure high-quality results. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2009