Assessing resilience engineering based on safety culture and managerial factors

Authors

  • G.H.A. Shirali,

    1. Department of Occupational Health, Ergonomics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Center for Health Research, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • I. Mohammadfam,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Occupational Health, Ergonomics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Center for Health Research, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
    • Department of Occupational Health, Ergonomics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Center for Health Research, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • M. Motamedzade,

    1. Department of Occupational Health, Ergonomics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Center for Health Research, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • V. Ebrahimipour,,

    1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Tehran University, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author
  • A. Moghimbeigi

    1. Department of Occupational Health, Ergonomics, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Center for Health Research, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Resilience engineering (RE) is the inherent capacity of a plant to cope with complex and unexpected events. The real challenge for RE is to recognize that complex systems are dynamic and that dynamic systems may sometimes change from a state of dynamic stability into a state of dynamic instability. This article explores RE based on safety culture indicators and managerial factors. In a plant survey we measured seven safety culture indicators and four management factors that are known to influence RE. We describe a simple survey method that can be used to identify deficiencies related to RE. For example, we found three major problems; that is, (a) poor safety training, (b) poor management of change, and (c) poor attitudes (looking for scapegoats and placing production ahead of safety). © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog, 2012

Ancillary