This article was originally presented at the 9th Global Congress on Process Safety, San Antonio, TX April 29 to May 1 2013.
Process Safety Management–Improving Performance
Near misses—private or public concern?
Version of Record online: 2 SEP 2013
© 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Process Safety Progress
Volume 32, Issue 4, pages 328–331, December 2013
How to Cite
Brabson, J. (2013), Near misses—private or public concern?. Proc. Safety Prog., 32: 328–331. doi: 10.1002/prs.11630
- Issue online: 26 NOV 2013
- Version of Record online: 2 SEP 2013
- near miss;
Near miss incidents include those releases and/or fires that do not result in significant employee injury or costs. In many cases there are federal reporting requirements that include reports to the National Response Center. Loss of containment releases are often near misses for catastrophic incidents and provide evidence of process safety program weaknesses. Facilities have an interest in conducting incident investigations to find root causes, lessons learned, and make safety improvements. Small sites often do not have the expertise to conduct good investigations while some large sites may tend to blame operator error rather than admit management system errors or process design issues. This article explains 2002 amendments of the Delaware requirement to report releases. The amendment adds the reporting of flammable gas releases and expands the existing written follow up report requirements to explain the “facts and circumstances leading to the release and the measures proposed to prevent the future releases and remedy any deficiencies in the prevention program.” Having this “public” examination of near miss investigations puts pressure on both industry and our regulatory program to seek root causes and make practical improvements in site process safety programs—without adding any substantial regulatory burden to industry. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 32: 328–331, 2013