Imidacloprid as a contact arrestant for larvae of the European chafer, Amphimallon majale

Authors

  • Gengping Zhu,

    Corresponding author
    1. College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
    2. Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA
    • Gengping Zhu, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. E-mail: gengpingzhu@hotmail.com

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Matthew J Petersen,

    1. Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Guoqing Liu,

    1. College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Daniel C Peck

    1. Department of Entomology, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA
    2. EntomoTech Fundamentals, Geneva, NY, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manipulative studies of the behavioral response of soil-dwelling insects to insecticides and other antagonists are stymied by the difficulties of observing and interpreting interactions played out below ground. Six experiments were carried out using X-ray radiography to quantify the movement of the European chafer, Amphimallon majale (Razoumowsky), larvae in response to imidacloprid and how this was affected by host plant cues and cold temperature.

RESULTS: The movement of third instars was arrested in imidacloprid-treated soil at ≥ 0.6 ppm concentration. At ≥ 0.8 ppm, the arrestant effect of imidacloprid was stronger than the attraction cue posed by germinating grass seed. There was a less disruptive effect on dispersal distance in vertical versus lateral panels. In vertical panels, there was a less disruptive effect on downward movement under a cold temperature treatment that simulated overwintering conditions.

CONCLUSION: Larvae of A. majale do not remotely detect imidacloprid in the soil; they neither evade contact, nor are repelled after contact. Imidacloprid thereby acts as a contact arrestant to disrupt grub movement. This finding might help to explain the synergistic effect of imidacloprid in combination with other biological agents for white grub control, and its effects on grub overwintering behavior. © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry

Ancillary