SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Pike DR, Knake EL and McGlamery MD, Weed control trends and practices in North America, in The Triazine Herbicides: 50 Years of Revolutionizing Agriculture, ed. by LeBaron HM, McFarland JE and Burnside OC. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 4556 (2008).
  • 2
    LeBaron HM, McFarland JE and Burnside OC, The triazine herbicides: a milestone in the development of weed control technology, in The Triazine Herbicides: 50 Years of Revolutionizing Agriculture, ed. by LeBaron HM, McFarland JE and Burnside OC. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 112 (2008).
  • 3
    Mitchell PD, Economic assessment of the benefits of chloro-s-triazine herbicides to US corn, sorghum, and sugarcane producers. University of Wisconsin Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper No. 564. [Online]. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (2011). Available: http://www.aae.wisc.edu/pubs/sps/pdf/stpap564.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 4
    Hawkins DE, Slife FW and Swanson ER, Economic analysis of herbicide use in various crop sequences. Ill Agric Econ 17:813 (1977).
  • 5
    Martin MA, Schreiber MM, Riepe JR and Bahr JR, The economics of alternative tillage systems, crop rotations, and herbicide use on three representative east-central corn belt farms. Weed Sci 39:299307 (1991).
  • 6
    Pike DR, Steffey K, Gray M, Kirby W, Edwards D and Hornbaker R, Field corn and soybean pesticide use and insecticide cluster assessment. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL (1994).
  • 7
    Swinton SM, Lybecker D and King R, The effect of local triazine restriction policies on recommended weed management in corn. Rev Agric Econ 17:351367 (1994).
  • 8
    Johnson WG, Bradley R, Hart SE, Buesinger ML and Massey RE, Efficacy and economics of weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 14:5765 (2000).
  • 9
    Ferrell JA and Witt WW, Comparison of glyphosate with other herbicides for weed control in corn (Zea mays): efficacy and economics. Weed Technol 16:701706 (2002).
  • 10
    Nolte SA and Young BG, Efficacy and economic return on investment for conventional and herbicide-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 16:371378 (2002).
  • 11
    Assessment of Potential Mitigation Measures for Atrazine. [Online]. Biological and Economic Analysis Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (2002). Available: https://ag.purdue.edu/extension/ppp/Documents/ABA-02-03.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 12
    Carlson G, The use of economic benefit models in estimating the value of triazine herbicides, in The Triazine Herbicides: 50 Years of Revolutionizing Agriculture, ed. by LeBaron HM, McFarland JE and Burnside OC. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 153162 (2008).
  • 13
    Carlson G, Cost impacts if atrazine or triazines were not available to growers, in Triazine Herbicides: Risk Assessment, ed. by Ballentine LG, McFarland JE and Hackett DS. ACS Symposium Series 683, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1998).
  • 14
    Ackerman F, The economics of atrazine. Int J Occup Env Hlth 13:441449 (2007).
  • 15
    Ribaudo M and Bouzaher A, Atrazine: environmental characteristics and economics of management. Agricultural Economic Report No. 699, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (1994).
  • 16
    Trostle R, Marti D, Rosen S and Westcott P, Why have food commodity prices risen again? Outlook No. WRS-1103, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2011).
  • 17
    Quick Stats: US & State – Crops: Online Database. [Online]. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (2013). Available: http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ [22 October 2013].
  • 18
    Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2010).
  • 19
    Foresman C and Glasgow L, US grower perceptions and experience with glyphosate-resistant weeds. Pest Manag Sci 64:388391 (2008).
  • 20
    Johnson WG, Owen MDK, Kruger GR, Young BG, Shaw DR, Wilson RG et al., U.S. farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 23:308312 (2009).
  • 21
    Powles SB, Review: Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360365 (2008).
  • 22
    Hurley M, Mitchell PD and Frisvold GB, Effects of weed-resistance concerns and resistance-management practices on the value of roundup ready crops. AgBioForum 12:291302 (2009).
  • 23
    Givens WA, Shaw DR, Newman ME, Weller SC, Young BG, Wilson RG et al., Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States, Part 3: Grower awareness and management practices regarding glyphosate-resistant weeds. Pest Manag Sci 67:758770 (2011).
  • 24
    Owen MDK, Young B, Shaw DR, Wilson RG, Jordan DL, Dixon PM et al., Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant crop systems in the United States. Part 2: Perspectives. Pest Manag Sci 67:747757 (2011).
  • 25
    Westcott P, Ethanol expansion in the United States: how will the agricultural sector adjust? FDS-07D-01. [Online]. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2007). Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/fds/2007/05may/fds07d01/fds07d01.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 26
    Larson JA, English BC, De La Torre Ugarte DG, Menard RJ, Hellwinkel CM and West TO, Economic and environmental impacts of the corn grain ethanol industry on the United States agricultural sector. J Soil Water Conserv 65:267279 (2010).
  • 27
    Gehlhar M, Winston A and Somwaru A, Effects of increased biofuels on the U.S. economy in 2022. Economic Research Report No. 102. [Online]. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2010). Available: http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err102/ [22 October 2013].
  • 28
    Taylor CR, AGSIM: An econometric-simulation model of regional crop and national livestock production in the Unites States, in Agricultural Sector Models for the United States: Description and Selected Policy Applications, ed. by Taylor CR, Reichelderfer K and Johnson S. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA (1993).
  • 29
    Bridges D, A Biological Analysis of the Use and Benefits of Chloro-s-triazine Herbicides in U.S. Corn and Sorghum Production. [Online]. Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, Tifton, GA (2011). Available: http://www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/2011/atrazine/Bridges__9Nov2011.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 30
    Taylor CR and Taylor MM, A brief description of AGSIM: an econometric-simulation model of the agricultural economy used for biofuel evaluation. BioEnergy Policy Brief BPB 070109. [Online]. Auburn University, College of Agriculture, Auburn, AL (2009). Available: http://www.ag.auburn.edu/biopolicy/documents/AGSIM%20Econometric-Simulation%20Model%20Description.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 31
    Farm Resource Regions. ERS Mapping and Spatial Data Center: Digital Map Galleries. [Online]. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2000). Available: http://maps.ers.usda.gov/mapimages/ers_reg_bw2.jpg [22 October 2013].
  • 32
    Osteen C and Kuchler F, Potential bans of corn and soybean pesticides. Agricultural Economic Report No. 546, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (1986).
  • 33
    Osteen C and Kuchler F, Pesticide regulatory decisions: production efficiency, equity, and interdependence. Agribusiness 3:307322 (1987).
  • 34
    Osteen C and Suguiyama L, Losing chlordimeform use in cotton production: its effects on the economy and pest resistance. Agricultural Economic Report No. 587, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (1988).
  • 35
    Tauer LW, Economic impact of future biological nitrogen fixation technologies on United States agriculture. Plant Soil 119:261270 (1989).
  • 36
    Tauer L and Love J, The potential economic impact of herbicide resistant corn in the USA. J Prod Agric 2:202207 (1989).
  • 37
    Dinan T, Simons C and Lloyd R, The agricultural sector study: impacts of environmental regulations on agriculture. EPA 230-09-88-040. [Online]. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1988). Available: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0307B-01.pdf/$file/EE-0307B-01.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 38
    Dinan T, Salassi M and Simons C, Farm-level impacts of recent and proposed environmental regulations on selected farm types. Agribusiness 7:115133 (1991).
  • 39
    Taylor CR, Deterministic versus stochastic evaluation of the aggregate economic effects of price support programs. Agric Syst 44:461473 (1994).
  • 40
    Taylor CR, Smith HA, Johnson JB and Clark RT, Aggregate economic effects of CRP land returning to production. J Soil Water Conserv 49:473476 (1994).
  • 41
    Taylor CR, Penson JB, Jr, Smith E and Knutson R, Economic impacts of chemical use reduction on the south. S J Agric Econ 23:1524 (1991).
  • 42
    Ribaudo MO and Hurley TM, Economic and environmental effects associated with reducing the use of atrazine: an example of cross-disciplinary research. J Agric Appl Econ 29:8797 (1997).
  • 43
    White JM, Allen PG, Moffitt LJ and Kingsley PP, Economic analysis of an areawide program for biological control of the alfalfa weevil. Am J Alter Agric 10:173179 (1995).
  • 44
    Szmedra P, Banning 2,4-D and the phenoxy herbicides: potential economic impact. Weed Sci 45:592598 (1997).
  • 45
    The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990. [Online]. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1997). Available: http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/1970-1990/contsetc.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 46
    Fuglie KO, Conservation tillage and pesticide use in the cornbelt. J Agric Appl Econ 31:133147 (1999).
  • 47
    Buhler DD, Early preplant atrazine and metolachlor in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 5:6671 (1991).
  • 48
    Buhler DD, Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems. Weed Sci 40:241248 (1992).
  • 49
    Gebhardt MR, Daniel TC, Schweizer EE and Allmaras RR, Conservation tillage. Science 230:625630 (1985).
  • 50
    Kroskinen WC and McWhorter CG, Weed control in conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 41:365370 (1986).
  • 51
    Wilson RG, Young BG, Matthews JL, Weller SC, Johnson WG, Jordan DL et al., Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 4: Weed management practices and effects on weed populations and soil seedbanks. Pest Manag Sci 67:771780 (2011).
  • 52
    AgroTrak®. GfK Kynetec, St Louis, MO (2010).
  • 53
    Tillage Type Definitions. [Online]. Conservation Tillage Information Center, West Lafayette, IN (2010). Available: http://ctic.paqinteractive.com/media/pdf/TillageDefinitions.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 54
    Frisvold GB, Boor A and Reeves JM, Simultaneous diffusion of herbicide resistant cotton and conservation tillage. AgBioForum 12:249257 (2009).
  • 55
    Givens WA, Shaw DR, Kruger GR, Johnson WG, Weller SC, Young BG et al., Survey of tillage trends following the adoption of glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 23:150155 (2009).
  • 56
    Fulton M and Keyowski L, The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant canola. AgBioForum 2:8593 (1999).
  • 57
    Ward C, Flanders A, Isengildina O and White F, Efficiency of alternative technologies and cultural practices for cotton in Georgia. AgBioForum 5:1013 (2002).
  • 58
    Fernandez-Cornejo J and Caswell M, The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin No. 11, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2006).
  • 59
    Young BG, Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol 20:301307 (2006).
  • 60
    Federal Register 75(144):44067–44072. [Online]. Conservation Reserve Program, USDA, Washington, DC (2010). Available: http://69.175.53.6/register/2010/jul/28/2010-18473.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 61
    Hellerstein D and Malcolm S, The influence of rising commodity prices on the conservation reserve program. Economic Research Report No. 110, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2011).
  • 62
    Cochrane WW, Farm Prices: Myth and Reality. University of Minnesota Press, St Paul, MN (1958).
  • 63
    Moschini G, Lapan H and Sobelevsky A, Roundup ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex. Agribusiness 16:3355 (2000).
  • 64
    Price GK, Lin W, Falck-Zepeda JB and Fernandez-Cornejo J, Size and distribution of market benefits from adopting biotech crops. Technical Bulletin No. 1906, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (2003).
  • 65
    Fernandez-Cornejo J, Hendricks C and Mishra A, Technology adoption and off-farm household income: the case of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. J Agric Appl Econ 37:549563 (2005).
  • 66
    Baker AJ, Estimating feed use: background and issues. Feed Yearbook. [Online]. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC (1998). Available: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/ers/FDS-yearbook//1990s/1998/FDS-yearbook-04-03-1998.asc [22 October 2013].
  • 67
    Bouzaher A, Cabe R, Shogren J, Carriquiry A, Holtkamp D, Gassman P et al., Atrazine and water quality: an updated CEEPES analysis. Staff Report 92-SR 59. [Online]. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1992). Available: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/92sr59.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 68
    Bouzaher A, Holtkamp D, Lakshminarayan P, Gassman P, Reese R, Campbell T et al., Atrazine and water quality: an evaluation of restricting atrazine use on corn and sorghum to postemergent applications. Staff Report 93-SR 68. [Online]. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1993). Available: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/93sr68.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 69
    Lakshminarayan P, Bouzaher A, Otake T, Campbell T, Gassman P, Ribaudo M et al., Corn and sorghum herbicides and water quality: an evaluation of alternative policy options. Staff Report 94-SR 70. [Online]. Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (1994). Available: http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/94sr70.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 70
    Lakshminarayan P, Bouzaher A and Shogren J, Atrazine and water quality: an evaluation of alternative policy options. J Environ Manag 48:111126 (1996).
  • 71
    Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Benefits: Water Quality, Soil Productivity and Wildlife Estimates. [Online]. USDA Farm Service Agency, Washington, DC (2008). Available: http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/crpbennies.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 72
    Fish and wildlife response to farm bill conservation practices. Technical Review 07-1. [Online]. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD (2007). Available: http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/full_report.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 73
    Mitchell PD, Estimating soil erosion and fuel use changes and their monetary values with AGSIM: a case study for triazine herbicides. Staff Paper No. 563 [Online]. Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (2011). Available: http://www.aae.wisc.edu/pubs/sps/pdf/stpap563.pdf [22 October 2013].
  • 74
    Agricultural Chemical Use Database. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington, DC (2010). Available: http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/ [22 October 2013].