SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aberson SD. 2002. Two years of operational hurricane synoptic surveillance. Weather and Forecasting 17: 11011110.
  • Aberson SD. 2003. Targeted observations to improve operational tropical cyclone track forecast guidance. Mon. Weather Rev. 131: 16131628.
  • Bergot T. 1999. Adaptive observations during FASTEX: A systematic survey of upstream flights. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125: 32713298.
  • Bishop CH, Etherton BJ, Majumdar SJ. 2001. Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter. Part I: Theoretical aspects. Mon. Weather Rev. 129: 430436.
  • Buizza R. 1994. Sensitivity of optimal unstable structures. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 120: 429451.
  • Buizza R, Montani A. 1999. Targeting observations using singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci. 56: 29652985.
  • Buizza R, Palmer TN. 1995. The singular-vector structure of the atmospheric global circulation. J. Atmos. Sci. 52: 14341456.
  • Cardinali C, Buizza R. 2003. Forecast skill of targeted observations: A singular-vector-based diagnostic. J. Atmos. Sci. 60: 19271940.
  • Cardinali C, Buizza R, Kelly G, Shapiro M, Thépaut J-N. 2007. The value of observations. III: Influence of weather regimes on targeting. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133: 18331842.
  • Coutinho MM, Hoskins BJ, Buizza R. 2004. The influence of physical processes on extratropical singular vectors. J. Atmos. Sci. 61: 195209.
  • Ehrendorfer M, Errico RM, Raeder KD. 1999. Singular-vector perturbation growth in a primitive equation model with moist physics. J. Atmos. Sci. 56: 16271648.
  • Gelaro R, Langland RH, Rohaly GD, Rosmond TE. 1999. As assessment of the singular-vector approach to targeted observing using the FASTEX dataset. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125: 32993327.
  • Gelaro R, Reynolds CA, Langland RH, Rohaly GD. 2000. A predictability study using geostationary satellite wind observations during NORPEX. Mon. Weather. Rev. 128: 37893807.
  • Gilmour I, Smith LA, Buizza R. 2001. Linear regime duration: Is 24 hours a long time in synoptic weather forecasting? J. Atmos. Sci. 58: 35253539.
  • Joly A, Browning KA, Bessemoulin P, Cammas J-P, Caniaux G, Chalon J-P, Clough SA, Dirks R, Emanuel KA, Eymard L, Gall R, Hewson TD, Hildebrand PH, Jorgensen D, Lalaurette F, Langland RH, Lemaitre Y, Marcart P, Moore JA, Persson POG, Roux F, Shapiro MA, Snyder C, Toth Z, Wakimoto RM. 1999. Overview of the field phase of the Fronts and Atlantic Storm-Track EXperiment (FASTEX) project. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125: 31313163.
  • Kelly G, Thépaut J-N, Buizza R, Cardinali C. 2007. The value of observations. I: Data denial experiments for the Atlantic and the Pacific. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 133: 18031815.
  • Langland RH. 2005. Issues in targeted observing. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131: 34093425.
  • Langland RH, Toth Z, Gelaro R, Szunyogh I, Shapiro MA, Majumdar SJ, Morss RE, Rohaly GD, Velden C, Bond N, Bishop CH. 1999. The North Pacific Experiment (NORPEX-98): Targeted observations for improved North American weather forecasts. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 80: 13631384.
  • Mahfouf JF, Rabier F. 2000. The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. II: Experimental results with improved physics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126: 11711190.
  • Majumdar SJ, Bishop CH, Buizza R, Gelaro R. 2002. A comparison of ensemble-transform Kalman-filter targeting guidance with ECMWF and NRL total-energy singular-vector guidance. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128: 25272549.
  • Majumdar SJ, Aberson SD, Bishop CH, Buizza R, Peng MS, Reynolds CA. 2006. A comparison of adaptive observing guidance for Atlantic tropical cyclones. Mon. Weather. Rev. 134: 23542372.
  • Molteni F, Buizza R, Palmer TN, Petroliagis T. 1996. The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122: 73119.
  • Montani A, Thorpe AJ, Buizza R, Unden P. 1999. Forecast skill of the ECMWF model using targeted observations during FASTEX. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125: 32193240.
  • Palmer TN, Gelaro R, Barkmeijer J, Buizza R. 1998. Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci. 55: 633653.
  • Petersen GN, Dumelow R, Thorpe AJ. 2006. Impact of NATReC observations on the UK Global model forecasts. Geophys. Res. Abs. 8: 08999.
  • Ralph FM, Persson POG, Reynolds D, Neiman PJ, Nuss W, Schmidt J, Jorgensen D, King C, White A, Bao J, Neff W, Kingsmill DE, Miller D, Toth Z, Wilczak J. 1998. ‘The use of tropospheric profiling in CALJET.’ Pp. 258260 in Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on tropospheric profiling: needs and technologies, 20–25 September 1998, Snowmass, CO, USA.
  • Snyder C. 1996. Summary of an informal workshop on adaptive observations and FASTEX. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77: 953961.
  • Szunyogh I, Toth Z, Morss RE, Majumdar SJ, Etherton BJ, Bishop CH. 2000. The effect of targeted dropsonde observations during the 1999 Winter Storm Reconnaissance program. Mon. Weather. Rev. 128: 35203537.
  • Szunyogh I, Toth Z, Zimin A, Majumdar S, Persson A. 2002. Propagation of the effect of targeted observations: The 2000 Winter Storm Reconnaissance program. Mon. Weather. Rev. 130: 11441165.
  • Toth Z, Szunyogh I, Bishop C, Majumdar S, Morss R, Moskaitis J, Reynolds D, Weinbrenner D, Michaud D, Surgi N, Ralph M, Parrish J, Talbot J, Pavone J, Lord S. 2002. ‘Adaptive observations at NCEP: Past, present and future.’ Proceedings of the symposium on observations, data assimilation, and probabilistic prediction, 13–17 January 2002, Orlando, FL, USA.