• Allan RP, Ringer MA. 2003. Inconsistencies between satellite estimates of long-wave cloud radiative forcing and dynamical fields from re-analyses. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30: DOI: 10.1029/2003GL017019.
  • Allan RP, Ringer MA, Pamment JA, Slingo A. 2004. Simulation of the Earth's radiation budget by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts 40-year reanalysis (ERA-40). J. Geophys. Res. 109: DOI: 10.1029/2004JD004816.
  • Barker HW. 2008. Representing cloud overlap with an effective decorrelation length: An assessment using CloudSat and CALIPSO data. J. Geophys. Res. 113: DOI: 10.1029/2008JD010391.
  • Barker HW, Stephens GL, Fu Q. 1999. The sensitivity of domain-averaged solar fluxes to assumptions about cloud geometry. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 125: 21272152.
  • Bender FA, Rodhe H, Charlson RJ, Ekman AML, Loeb N. 2006. 22 views of the global albedo—Comparison between 20 GCMs and two satellites. Tellus A 58: 320330.
  • Cahalan RF, Ridgway W, Wiscombe WJ, Bell TL, Snyder JB. 1994. The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 51: 24342455.
  • Carlin B, Fu Q, Lohmann U, Mace GG, Sassen K, Comstock JM. 2002. High-cloud horizontal inhomogeneity and solar albedo bias. J. Climate 15: 23212339.
  • Chevallier F, Bauer P, Kelly G, Jakob C, McNally T. 2001. Model clouds over oceans as seen from space: Comparison with HIRS/2 and MSU radiances. J. Climate 14: 42164229.
  • Edwards JM, Slingo A. 1996. Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: Choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122: 689719.
  • Hogan RJ, Illingworth AJ. 2000. Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126: 29032909.
  • Hogan RJ, Kew SF. 2005. A 3D stochastic cloud model for investigating the radiative properties of inhomogeneous cirrus clouds. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131: 25852608.
  • Illingworth AJ, Hogan RJ, O'Connor EJ, Bouniol D, Brooks ME, Delanoë J, Donovan DP, Eastment JD, Gaussiat N, Goddard JWF, Haeffelin M, Klein Baltink H, Krasnov OA, Pelon J, Piriou J-M, Protat A, Russchenberg HWJ, Seifert A, Tompkins AM, Van Zadelhoff G-J, Vinit F, Willén U, Wilson DR, Wrench CL. 2007. Cloudnet—Continuous evaluation of cloud profiles in seven operational models using ground-based observations. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 88: 883898.
  • Kristjánsson JE, Edwards JM, Mitchell DL. 2000. Impact of a new scheme for optical properties of ice crystals on climates of two GCMs. J. Geophys. Res. 105: 1006310079.
  • Mace GG, Benson-Troth S. 2002. Cloud-layer overlap characteristics derived from long-term cloud radar data. J. Climate 15: 25052515.
  • McClatchey RA, Fenn RW, Selby JEA, Volz FE, Garing JS. 1972. Optical properties of the atmosphere. Report number AFCRL72-0497. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Morcrette J, Jakob C. 2000. The response of the ECMWF model to changes in the cloud overlap assumption. Mon. Weather Rev. 128: 17071732.
  • Oreopoulos L, Platnick S, Hong G, Yang P, Cahalan RF. 2009. The short-wave radiative forcing bias of liquid and ice clouds from MODIS observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9: 58655875.
  • Pomroy HR, Illingworth AJ. 2000. Ice cloud inhomogeneity: Quantifying bias in emissivity from radar observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27: 21012104.
  • Räisänen P, Barker HW, Khairoutdinov MF, Li J, Randall DA. 2004. Stochastic generation of sub-gridscale cloudy columns for large-scale models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130: 20472067.
  • Randall DA, Wood RA, Bony S, Colman R, Fichefet T, Fyfe J, Kattsov V, Pitman A, Shukla J, Srinivasan J, Stouffer RJ, Sumi A, Taylor KE. 2007. Climate models and their evaluation. Chapter 8 in Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Itergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL. (eds.) Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
  • Shonk JKP, Hogan RJ. 2008. Tripleclouds: An efficient method for representing cloud inhomogeneity in 1D radiation schemes by using three regions at each height. J. Climate 21: 23522370.
  • Shonk JKP, Hogan RJ, Edwards JM, Mace GG. 2010. Effect of improving representation of horizontal and vertical cloud structure on the Earth's global radiation budget. Part I: Review and parametrization. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136: 11911204, DOI: 10.1002/qj.647.
  • Slingo A. 1990. Sensitivity of the Earth's radiation budget to changes in low clouds. Nature 343: 4951.
  • Tompkins AM. 2002. A prognostic parametrisation for the subgrid-scale variability of water vapour and clouds in large-scale models and its use to diagnose cloud cover. J. Atmos. Sci. 59: 19171942.
  • Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, Da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, Van De Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf JF, Morcrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J. 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131: 29613012.
  • Wielicki BA, Barkstrom BR, Harrison EF, Lee III RB, Louis Smith G, Cooper JE. 1996. Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES): An Earth observing system experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77: 853868.