This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A.
Research Article
Effects of nitrate and water on the oxygen isotopic analysis of barium sulfate precipitated from water samples†
Article first published online: 19 NOV 2008
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3832
This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the U.S.A. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1097-0231/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=685086e2b20ab07e9ab5ac022b9782ebdcd7ce5c)
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Volume 22, Issue 24, pages 4109–4120, 30 December 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Hannon, J. E., Böhlke, J. K. and Mroczkowski, S. J. (2008), Effects of nitrate and water on the oxygen isotopic analysis of barium sulfate precipitated from water samples. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 22: 4109–4120. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3832
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 NOV 2008
- Article first published online: 19 NOV 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 12 OCT 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 11 OCT 2008
- Manuscript Received: 1 AUG 2008
Funded by
- National Research Program in Water Resources, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
BaSO4 precipitated from mixed salt solutions by common techniques for SO
isotopic analysis may contain quantities of H2O and NO
that introduce errors in O isotope measurements. Experiments with synthetic solutions indicate that δ18O values of CO produced by decomposition of precipitated BaSO4 in a carbon reactor may be either too low or too high, depending on the relative concentrations of SO
and NO
and the δ18O values of the H2O, NO
, and SO
. Typical δ18O errors are of the order of 0.5 to 1‰ in many sample types, and can be larger in samples containing atmospheric NO
, which can cause similar errors in δ17O and Δ17O. These errors can be reduced by (1) ion chromatographic separation of SO
from NO
, (2) increasing the salinity of the solutions before precipitating BaSO4 to minimize incorporation of H2O, (3) heating BaSO4 under vacuum to remove H2O, (4) preparing isotopic reference materials as aqueous samples to mimic the conditions of the samples, and (5) adjusting measured δ18O values based on amounts and isotopic compositions of coexisting H2O and NO
. These procedures are demonstrated for SO
isotopic reference materials, synthetic solutions with isotopically known reagents, atmospheric deposition from Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA, and sulfate salt deposits from the Atacama Desert, Chile, and Mojave Desert, California, USA. These results have implications for the calibration and use of O isotope data in studies of SO
sources and reaction mechanisms. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1097-0231/asset/RCM_left.gif?v=1&s=91be5e0205fbe00fe36141e410291b5802ce099f)