SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Anvari M, Broderick T, Stein H, et al. The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery. Comput Aid Surg 2005; 10(2): 9399.
  • 2
    Arcara P, Melchiorri C. Control schemes for teleoperation with time delay: a comparative study. Robotics Autonom Sys 2002; 38: 4964.
  • 3
    Bejczy A, Kim W. Predictive displays and shared compliance control for time-delayed manipulation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robot Systems (IROS) 1990; 407412.
  • 4
    Butner S, Ghodoussi M. Transforming a surgical robot for human telesurgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 2003; 19(5): 818824.
  • 5
    Chong N, Kotoku T, Kohtaro O, et al. Remote coordinated controls in multiple robot cooperation. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robot Automation 2000; 31383143.
  • 6
    Cronin E, Kurc A, Filstrup B, Jamin S. An efficient synchronization mechanism for mirrored game architectures. Multimedia Tools Apps 2004; 23(1): 730.
  • 7
    DeSouza G, Kak A. A subsumptive, hierarchical, and distributed vision-based architecture for smart robotics. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyber 2004; 34(5): 19882002.
  • 8
    Fabrizio M, Lee B, Chan D, et al. Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation. J Endourol 2000; 14(2): 133138.
  • 9
    Ferrell W. Remote manipulation with transmission delay. IEEE Trans Human Factors Electron 1965; Human Factors Electron 6, no. 1.
  • 10
    Feretti S. Interactive maintenance for event synchronization in massive multiplayer online games. Technical Report Univ of Bologna Dept of Comp Sci 2005–05; 1202.
  • 11
    Galbraith J, Kenyon G, Ziolkowski R. Time-to-collision estimation from motion based on primate visual processing. IEEE Trans Pat Anal Mach Intellig 2005; 27(8): 12791291.
  • 12
    Held R, Durlach N. Telepresence, time delay and adaptation. In Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments, EllisSR (ed.). Taylor and Francis: London, 1991; 232246.
  • 13
    Kim T, Zimmerman P, Wade M, Weiss C. The effect of delay visual feedback on telerobotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 683686.
  • 14
    Kondo N, Monta M, Fujiura T. Fruit harvesting robots in Japan. Adv Space R 1996; 18(1): 181184.
  • 15
    Lane J, Carignan C, Akin D. Advanced operator interface design for complex space telerobots. Auton Robot 2001; 11: 4958.
  • 16
    Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001; 413: 379380.
  • 17
    Munir S, Book W. Internet-based teleoperation using wave variables with prediction. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2002; 7(2): 124133.
  • 18
    Sayers C, Paul R. Coping with delays: controlling robot manipulators under water. Indust Robot 1994; 21(5): 2426.
  • 19
    Sheridan T. Teleoperation, telerobotics and telepresence: a progress report. Control Eng Practice 1995; 3(2): 205214.
  • 20
    Sheridan T. Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 1993; 9(5): 592606.
  • 21
    Thompson J, Ottensmeyer M, Sheridan T. Human factors in tele-inspection and tele-surgery: cooperative manipulation under asynchronous video and control feedback. Medical Image Computing & Computer Assisted Intervention 1998; 368376.
  • 22