1520-6831/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=fcc7753e797b2a0057b2ac3296ab23bb709f0027 "Remediation Journal")
R. Steven Maxwell is president of TechKNOWLEDGEy Marketing Services, a management and strategic consulting firm in Boulder, Colorado, which serves a variety of commercial environmental companies. Linda F. Hildebrand is general manager and a founder of Subsurface Technology, based in Orlando, Florida, a subsidiary of HydroLogic, Inc.
1520-6831/asset/REM_centre.gif?v=1&s=c82f84f18a2f8c765fd29b90e39c4e36137b41f3)
Article
Improved direct push technologies: Quicker and cheaper on-site methods for sampling and monitoring
Article first published online: 2 AUG 2006
DOI: 10.1002/rem.3440040406
Copyright © 1994 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Additional Information
How to Cite
Maxwell, R. S. and Hildebrand, L. F. (1994), Improved direct push technologies: Quicker and cheaper on-site methods for sampling and monitoring. Remediation, 4: 435–442. doi: 10.1002/rem.3440040406
- †
R. Steven Maxwell is president of TechKNOWLEDGEy Marketing Services, a management and strategic consulting firm in Boulder, Colorado, which serves a variety of commercial environmental companies. Linda F. Hildebrand is general manager and a founder of Subsurface Technology, based in Orlando, Florida, a subsidiary of HydroLogic, Inc.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 AUG 2006
- Article first published online: 2 AUG 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Cost-effective remedial action is dependent on clear identification of site conditions and accurate delineation of contamination. Many site cleanups have been hampered by complex subsurface conditions. Standard drilling and monitoring well installations have proven to be costly and time-consuming. Improved direct push technologies, however, are being developed to perform quicker and less expensive on-site sampling and testing. This article describes the benefits of improved direct push technologies.