First Lieutenant Brian J. Grelk graduated magna cum laude with a B.S. in nuclear engineering. He received his commission in May 1995. In March 1997, he received his M.S. in operations research from the School of Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology and is currently an operations analyst at the 422 Testing and Evaluation Squadron at Nellis Air Force Base in Las Vegas, Nevada. Lieutenant Colonel.
Making the CERCLA Criteria Analysis of Remedial Alternatives More Objective
Version of Record online: 11 JAN 2007
Copyright © 1998 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Volume 8, Issue 2, pages 87–105, 1998
How to Cite
Grelk, B. J., Kloeber, J. M., Jackson, J. A., Parnell, G. S. and Deckro, R. F. (1998), Making the CERCLA Criteria Analysis of Remedial Alternatives More Objective. Remediation, 8: 87–105. doi: 10.1002/rem.3440080209
- Issue online: 11 JAN 2007
- Version of Record online: 11 JAN 2007
This article shows how decision analysis techniques assisted decision makers in the critical RI/FS task of technology selection at a specific Superfund site. Each remediation alternative's performance was quantified by creating a set of objective evaluation measures tied to the criteria mandated in the comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. The evaluation measure scores were input into a quantitative decision analysis model used to rank alternatives based on their performance relative to the CERCLA criteria, and to provide insight to the sensitivity of the results to changes in decision maker preferences or technology performance. The model is designed to reflect the site decision maker's preferences and the site-specific characteristics within the framework of the nine CERCLA criteria. This model will give Superfund site decision makers an objective and transparent framework to evaluate remedial technologies.