SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Spiritual well-being;
  • quality of life;
  • paraplegia

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

Purpose

The promotion of quality of life (QOL) and healthy development across the person's life span can result in long and meaningful lives. The purpose of this study was to examine relationships between spiritual well-being (SWB), depression, and QOL for adults with paraplegia.

Design

A descriptive correlational design was used for this study.

Methods

A purposive sample of 75 participants completed the Ellison's SWB Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and a QOL scale.

Findings

Quality of life was significantly associated with SWB (= .47, = .01), and depression (r = −.59, = .01), 43% of the variance in QOL was explained by age, gender, length of stay, SWB, and depression (F[5,69] = 10.45, < .001).

Conclusions

Participants with a strong sense of purpose or meaning in life were more likely to experience a higher QOL.

Clinical Relevance

Rehabilitation nurses can help guide patients to the discovery of what brings purpose and meaning to their lives.


Introduction and Background

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating injuries and affects the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being dimensions of the person, as well as their subjective quality of life (QOL) (Post & van Leuven, 2012; Song & Nam, 2010). There are approximately 273,000 people in the United States living with a SCI, with the estimation of 12,000 occurring annually (National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2013). Due to rapid medical emergency services and medical technologies available and despite the risk of fatal medical complications, such as pulmonary emboli, pneumonia, and septicemia as well as the incidence of depressive symptoms (Krause, Kemp & Coker, 2000), people with SCI are living well into their 70s, with the average life span of adults with paraplegia at 65–73 years (National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center, 2013). The person with paraplegia is aging with physiological and psychological complications, posing the concern of their QOL (Kemp & Ettelson, 2001; Krause, 2010). Depressive symptomatology is the most common psychological complication experienced by people with SCI (Fuhrer, Rintala, Hart, Clearman & Young, 1993), with a higher incidence identified in those of increasing age and longer length of injury (Krause et al., 2000). Although some studies indicate people aging with SCI have improved QOL over time (Charlifue & Gerhart, 2004; Hu, Mak, Wong, Leong & Luk, 2008), it is well documented that QOL is a main concern for most individuals living with SCI.

Barker et al. (2009) illustrated a significant lower QOL between people with SCI than those nondisabled based on the Australian norm (< .001). In a study of 270 people, decreased function, secondary impairments, activity limitations, and the inability to participate in community or social events were the causes explained for a poorer QOL (Barker et al., 2009). Their findings were similar to those of Blanes, Carmagnani and Ferreira (2008) who studied 60 individuals with paraplegia living in Brazil; low subjective QOL due to the incidences of pain, pressure ulcers, demeaning or lack of employment, poor vitality, or significant impaired physical function was found (Blanes et al., 2008).

Although many studies addressing the QOL of people with SCI have shown predictors such as functional independence, employment, and social or family support lead to a higher QOL (Barker et al., 2009; Blanes et al., 2008; van Leuven et al., 2012), little research has been conducted to consider whether or not a person's spiritual well-being (SWB) may improve QOL while living with SCI.

SCI has a major impact on the person's SWB including positive feelings, such as greater awareness of self (McColl et al., 2000) and the belief the SCI survivor serves a higher purpose for God or Supreme Being (Graf, Marini, Baker & Buek, 2007). In contrast, a minority of those studied believed the injury served as a punishment from God or Supreme Being; others bargained with God and felt abandoned when their prayers were not answered (Graf et al., 2007). Marini and Glover-Graf (2011) found the interest in religious or spiritual practices was high initially, but over time decreased as living with SCI was slowly adapted to and life adjustments were made. Most participants in the study felt “satisfaction with God… that God was a source of coping and gave meaning to their life” (p. 82).

Brillhart (2005) studied the relationship between a person's SWB and satisfaction with life of 230 long-term SCI individuals. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Pavot & Diener, 1993) and the Factor III of psychological/spiritual of the Quality of Life Index (QLI, Ferrans & Powers, 1985) were used as measurements. Study results indicated a significant positive correlation (= .621, = .001), including both domains with life satisfaction: peace of mind (= .65) and faith in God (= .47), (Brillhart, 2005). Although Brillhart analyzes faith in God and peace of mind using the QLI instrument, the study does not address the participant's religious affiliation, whether or not he/she is practicing his/her faith, assess SWB from an existential approach, or the incidence of depression. These factors separately or in combination may affect the person's SWB and subjective QOL.

Notably, extant research indicates improved health outcomes and QOL following illness or disability result if SWB is assessed and spiritual needs are addressed (Brillhart, 2005; Chlan, Zebracki & Vogel, 2011; Marini & Glover-Graf, 2011; Rippentrop, Altmaier & Burns, 2006; Tan, Wutthilert & O'Connor, 2011). Nonetheless, with the recognition that spirituality is a complex, multilayered dynamic, which is different for each person, the literature lacks clarity in whether the association between SWB and QOL is due to faith in God solely (religiosity) or from a sense of purpose in life (existential).

Purpose of the study

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between SWB, depression, and QOL for people living with paraplegia 1 year and longer. Specific research questions included: (1) What is the level of SWB (existential and religious), depression, and QOL among people with paraplegia? and (2) What is the relationship of SWB (existential and religious), depression, length of time injured, age, gender, and QOL for people with paraplegia?

Conceptual framework

This study was informed by Ferrell and Grant's “Quality of Life Model.” QOL encompasses the physical, psychological, social, and spiritual dimensions of the person (Ferrell & Grant, 2000). The dimensions are interrelated and the relevance of one or several of the aspects within the dimensions may be affected by change in individual circumstances, such as life changes from a SCI. The physical well-being dimension includes functional ability. As the person experiences multiple symptoms related to the disease or its progression, functional ability is affected. The psychological well-being is affected as emotional responses to illness can occur, such as anxiety, sadness, fear, depression, denial/acceptance, and hope/hopelessness (Ferrell, 2005). A person's sense of spirituality or SWB is often what helps the person cope with losses and find meaning in life (Ferrell, 2005). This is necessary for the person while dealing with the losses associated with a SCI. All dimensions of the “Quality of Life Model” affect the person living with paraplegia. This study focused on the interrelatedness of QOL to the dimensions of psychological well-being (depression) and SWB (religiosity and meaning).

Method

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

Design and procedure

A descriptive correlational cross-sectional design was used for this study. Following the approval by participating hospital and university review boards for the protection of human subjects, participants were recruited through flyer advertisement and word of mouth in outpatient clinics at a large urban rehabilitation healthcare center in Southern California between October and December 2009. Inclusion criteria: (a) SCI attendee classified as a paraplegic; (b) diagnosis of paraplegia 1 year or greater; (c) 18 years or older; and (d) capacity to speak English. Exclusion criteria included a SCI classified as tetraplegia and diagnosed within the last year. Participants who provided informed consent completed a survey administered by the PI (first author) on-site in a private room. To allow inclusion of people of all levels of literacy, items were read verbatim and responses recorded by the PI. The survey was comprised of three standardized instruments: Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS, Ellison & Paloutzian, 1982), Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale (Radloff, 1977), QOLS (Kemp & Kahan, 1995), and demographic items. Participants received a $10 gift card in acknowledgment of their time.

Measures

Spiritual well-being, defined as the whole of the two dimensions of well-being—religious and existential, was measured using the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS). It is a 20-item, 6-point Likert-type scale, developed by Ellison and Paloutzian (1982). The SWBS is comprised of two 10-item subscales: religious well-being (RWB) and existential well-being (EWB). RWB is defined as one's relationship with God or Supreme Being and reflects a person's sense of satisfaction and positive connection with God (Ellison & Paloutzian, 1982; Moberg & Brusek, 1978). Sample item includes “I have a personally meaningful relationship with God.” EWB is defined as one's general sense of life satisfaction, meaning, and purpose, absent from religious reference (Moberg & Brusek). “I believe that there is some purpose in my life” refers to EWB. The SWBS reflects the belief that SWB involves both dimensions (Ellison, 1983). Scores from this study ranged from 21 to 60 (RWB), 30–60 (EWB), and 56–120 (SWB Total), with higher scores indicating a higher level of SWB. Test–retest reliability coefficients for SWB (.93), RWB (.96), and EWB (.78), as well as face validity have been reported (Ellison & Paloutzian, 1982). In this study, Cronbach's alpha was SWB .93, RWB .95, and EWB .88.

Depressive symptoms, such as loss of appetite, sleep disturbances, feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, and worthlessness, were measured using the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale (Radloff, 1977). Respondents report on a 4-point Likert-type scale how often they experienced specific depressive symptoms in the past week, scoring from 0, rarely, to 3, most or all of the time. Items include “were you bothered by things that do not usually bother you?” and “did you enjoy life?” Scores range from 0–60, with higher scores indicating a higher level of depressive symptomatology. A score of 16 or higher represents being “depressed” (Radloff, 1977). The CES-D has been extensively used and validated across community populations (Comstock & Helsing, 1976; Hann, Winter & Jacobsen, 1999; Radloff, 1977) and with people with SCI (Miller, Anton & Townson, 2008). The CES-D has excellent reported reliabilities (.88–.92). In this study, Cronbach's alpha was 0.92.

Quality of Life defined as the subjective opinion about one's experience of living based on what is internally important to the person, not considering external events, specific situations, or limitations (Kemp & Ettelson, 2001) was measured using the QOL Scale developed at Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center in Downey, California (Kemp & Kahan, 1995). This scale is a visual analog method of measurement, facilitating a direct subjective approach to rate life satisfaction at the present moment, asking the individual “Taking everything in your life into account, rate your current overall QOL by placing an X on this 7-point scale…a 7 means life is great; it's really hard to imagine it could be much better…a 1 means life is very distressing; it's really hard to imagine how it could get much worse…a 4 means that life is neither good nor bad” (Kemp & Ettelson, 2001; Kemp & Kahan, 1995).

Kemp and Ettelson (2001) utilized the QOL Scale (Kemp & Kahan, 1995) to measure the effects of living and aging with SCI and found it was equivalent to the other indirect methods of measurement; having as much predictive validity as a longer measure of life satisfaction used by Fuhrer et al. (1993). Test–retest reliability and face validity have been reported (Kemp & Ettelson, 2001). Kemp and Ettelson reported a moderate correlation (r = .60; p < .001), between the QOL Scale and the Life Satisfaction Scale referenced by Fuhrer, Rintala, Hart, Clearman and Young (1992), with the disabled mean of 5.1 compared to the nondisabled mean of 6.0 on the QOL Scale. Participants in this study had a mean QOL score of 5.2.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using the software package SPSS, version 16. The sample size for the analysis is 75 participants, which is sufficient to detect a moderate standardized effect size (d = 0.32) using a two-tail significance test with a power of .80 and a significance level of .05 (Mertler & Vannatta, 2009). In the preliminary analyses, we examined for outliers, univariate, and multivariate normal distributions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all analysis variables. Chi-square tests for categorical variables and Pearson product-moment correlations for continuous variables were used to examine the relationships between the study variables. Simultaneous multiple regression was used to determine the accuracy of the independent variables in explaining the variance in QOL. This standard multiple regression strategy was appropriate because all independent variables are viewed as having equal importance, there were no apriori hypotheses, and regression diagnostic procedures did not detect problems with multicollinearity among the predictor variables. All tolerance values were > 0.10.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

Participants range from 18–78 years of age, with the majority (96%) between 18–57 years, and included 82.7% males. The sample is diverse Hispanic (56%) and black (29.3%) with the length of injury ranging between 1–39 years. The etiology of injury for over two-thirds (69.3%) was a gunshot wound. Analyses indicated no significant differences in person's SWB based upon source of injury (gunshot, MVA, and all other) F = .89 (2, 72), p = .42. Slightly less than half (45.3%) had some degree of college education with 13.3% receiving a bachelors' or masters' degree. Eighty-five percent lacked current employment, and 57.3% were not actively involved in support, sports, or church groups. Religious affiliation was primarily Christian (82.7%), with the majority (60.6%) practicing their faith; nine (12%) did not communicate a religious preference, however did state belief in a God or Supreme Being. Forty percent of participants were either married (21.3%) or had a significant partner in his/her life (18.7%); 40% stated they were single. Over half had children (56%), of those, only 18 (42.9%) were living in the same household. Approximately two-thirds (64%) scored below the cut-point of 16 on the CES-D scale, illustrating an absence of depression (Radloff, 1977); eight (10.7%) were currently prescribed antidepressant medication.

Mean scores of SWB Total (100.87), RWB (51.97), and EWB (48.89) were relatively high, indicating strong SWB. The CES-D mean (13.27) was 2.73 points below the cutoff score of 16 (depressive symptomatology). Participants viewed their QOL better than, “it's neither good nor bad,” with the mean 5.24. The average number of years living with paraplegia was 16.65 years (Table 1).

Table 1. Participant Characteristics (n = 75)
Variable n Range M SD
  1. N, Number of Participants; Range, minimum and maximum value/score obtained; QOL, Quality of Life; RWB, Religious Well-Being Subscale; EWB, Existential Well-Being Subscale; SWB Total, Spiritual Well-Being Total score; CES-D, Center of Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; M, mean/average; SD, Standard Deviation.

Age7522–78 years40.6510.79
Years/months post injury751–38 years/4 months16.669.56
RWB7521–6051.979.57
EWB7530–6048.898.80
SWB Total7556–120100.8716.03
CES-D750–5613.2711.90
QOL751–75.241.47
Length of time taking antidepressant medication81–15 years5.88 years5.82
Gender (n, %)
Male62 (82.7%)   
Cause of Injury (n, %)
Gunshot wound52 (69.3%)   
Motor vehicle accident12 (16.0%)   
Other11 (14.6%)   

Table 2 shows the correlations between the independent variables and QOL. In this sample, EWB had a strong positive correlation (= .628, = .01) and SWB Total had a moderate positive correlation (= .47, = .01) with QOL. A statistically significant inverse correlation was found between depression and QOL (= −.59, = .01). RWB trended toward a small positive correlation with QOL (= .216, = .06).

Table 2. Pearson Product-moment (r) Correlations Between Spiritual Well-being (Existential and Religious), Depression, Length of Injury, Gender, Age, and Quality of Life
Independent VariablesQuality of Life (r)
  1. n = 75.

  2. a

    p = .01 (two-tailed).

Spiritual well-being(SWBS total) .47a
Existential (EWB).63a
Religious (RWB).21
Depression (CES-D)−.59a
Length of Injury.10
Gender.19
Age−.05

Simultaneous multiple regression was conducted to determine the accuracy of the independent variables: RWB, EWB, depression, gender, age, and length of injury, which were entered into the analyses as continuous variables. The overall model significantly predicted QOL, R2 = .49, R2adj = .45, F(6, 69) = 10.92, p < .001. Gender, EWB, and depression significantly contributed to the model, with the model accounting for 49% of the variance in the person's QOL (Table 3).

Table 3. Regression Analysis of Paraplegic Patient's QOL on Six Predictor Variables
Predictor Variable (Independent Variable) B β SE t p-value
  1. RWB, Religious well-being Subscale; EWB, Existential well-being subscale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale; B, regression coefficient; SE, Standard Error; β, Beta Coefficient; t, t-test statistic comparing a difference between means of two groups; p, significance; F, F ratio: variation between and within groups; R, multiple correlation coefficient; R2, amount of variance in dependent variable due to the independent variable (Polit & Beck, 2006).

Age−.003−.02.01−.23.13
Gender.71.18.342.09.04
Length of Injury.002.02.02.15.88
RWB−.02−.11.02−1.03.31
EWB.08.48.023.52.001
CES-D−.04−.29.02−2.49.02
Multiple R = .70R squared adjusted = .45
R squared = .49F(6, 69) = 10.92, p = .000

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

Our study findings indicate the levels of SWB Total, as well as the subscales of EWB and RWB were relatively high. Notably, findings indicate despite living with paraplegia, the majority of patients found a sense of purpose and meaning in their lives. Although 39.4% of patients reported a lack of religious involvement or practice, most patients indicated a strong faith in God or Higher Power. In conversation, several patients explained that this catastrophic event resulted in a stronger faith and that “God was giving me a second chance.” This study suggests that despite living with a major disability, such as paraplegia, a person's SWB may be strong existentially in most cases, but even stronger religiously. Using the SWBS, Mathesis, Tulsky and Mathesis (2006) found people with SCI (57% tetraplegia) experienced average EWB (41.1, SD = 7.93) and average RWB (41.0, SD = 11.04). This is in comparison to this study which found higher levels of SWB (100.87, SD = 16.03), EWB (48.89, SD = 8.80), and RWB (51.97, SD = 9.57). The exclusion of tetraplegics may be the reason for higher SWB, EWB, and RWB scores in this study, with individuals having greater functioning ability.

The level of depression was lower in this study than the CES-D cutoff score of 16. The mean score of this study (13.27) was lower than the mean of 14.3 reported by Miller et al. (2008), but higher than previously reported by Fuhrer et al. (1993) of 12.1. Thirty-six percent of the current participants exhibited depressive symptoms, which is similar to the Miller et al. study that showed 39%. Decreased mobility has been associated with higher incidence of depressive symptoms (Fuhrer et al., 1993; Miller et al., 2008), as well as Latinos reporting a greater incidence of symptoms compared to other ethnic groups (Kemp, Krause & Adkins, 1999). Participants in this study scored higher on CES-D items which can be the result of limited mobility: “I feel everything I did was a real effort” and “my sleep was restless” due to the “inability to move freely.” Although 56% of participants in this study were Hispanic, an ANOVA showed no significant difference on depression mean scores by race/ethnicity, F(5, 69) = .696, = 0.63.

The level of QOL for people with paraplegia is moderate, it is better than “It's neither good nor bad,” with a mean of 5.24; however, it is not “high” (6–7). This result is similar to the findings of Kemp and Ettelson (2001) who found the disabled with SCI scored a 5.1 on the QOL Scale in contrast to the nondisabled who scored a 6.0. Charlifue and Gerhart (2004) reported a high perceived QOL by people with SCI that stabilizes over time. Over 9 years, 189 participants rated their QOL as either excellent/good, fair, or poor, at three different intervals. Excellent/good ratings for QOL resulted: 78.1% (initial interview), 82.8% (3 years later), 75.3% (6 years later), and 75.2% (9 years later).

EWB had a strong positive correlation (= .628, = .01) and SWB Total had a moderate positive correlation (= .47, = .01) with QOL. This suggests people with paraplegia who had purpose, peace, and meaning in life are more likely to indicate a higher subjective QOL. This is in contrast to RWB, which trended toward a small positive correlation (= .216, = .06) to QOL, illustrating although the participants on an average scored high on RWB, a significant association with QOL did not exist. This implies having a strong faith in God or Supreme Being does not necessarily result in a better perceived QOL. These results are consistent with previous studies conducted (Mathesis et al., 2006) with SCI patients; as well as with patients diagnosed with chronic illnesses (Delgado, 2007; Rippentrop et al., 2006).

The use of spiritual interventions may be an effective coping strategy in decreasing depression and enhancing one's QOL, as Coleman's (2004) study showed a higher sense of being and purpose (EWB) inversely correlated with the depression score and the predictors of EWB and RWB explained 32% variance in depression for people living with HIV/AIDS. Similar results were indicated in this study as EWB and SWB Total showed a significantly inverse relationship with depression scores (CES-D), emphasizing having a strong SWB can result in lower depressive symptomatology.

Gender, age, and length of injury were not significantly correlated with a person's QOL, although gender did show a trend and significantly contributed to the regression model. The lack of gender difference is identified in previous findings within the SCI population (Hampton, 2004; Hu et al., 2008; Krause, Saladin & Adkins, 2009; Lidal, Veenstra, Hjeltnes & Biering-Sorensen, 2008). Many studies indicate the person's subjective QOL or satisfaction in life improves as length of time post injury increases, as one adjusts to life and bodily changes (Krause, 2010). However, several studies show as age increases, QOL decreases, as well as an increase in depressive symptoms (Post & van Leuven, 2012; Saunders, Krause & Focht, 2012).

Strengths and limitations

The findings of this study are important because this is one of the few studies to examine the relationships between SWB, depression, patient characteristics, and QOL among an ethnically diverse group of paraplegics. Performing one-to-one direct personal interviews with participants and reading each item from the instruments reduced confusion of meaning. Although there is the potential for bias reading items verbatim, it allows for the inclusion of participants of all levels of literacy. The three standardized tools instruments used had sound psychometric properties, enhancing study results credibility. Although the SWBS has sound psychometric properties, it is not appropriate for people who do not believe in God or a Supreme Being, decreasing its generalization to all faith traditions. The sample size is adequate; however, the small representation of 13 women (17.3%), which is expected with the SCI population, limits information on their possible unique perceptions of spirituality and of QOL. The cause of injury was comprised of a large number of gunshot victims (69.3%) which is similar to etiology of SCI reported by Blanes, Carmagnani, and Ferreira (2008) of 63.3%, but much higher than the 14.3% reported by the National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (2013). This may be due to the location of the study where a high prevalence of gang-affiliated injuries is present. The sample was a purposive convenience sample that is relatively homogenous with respect to gender, geographic location, faith, and not randomly selected or matched. This nonrandom procedure may influence the findings through self-selection bias. The correlational, cross-sectional design allows for analysis at one point in time and disallows for changes over time.

Conclusions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References

A person's SWB contributes to the QOL of a person living with paraplegia and possibly lowers the incidence of depression. As expected, depression had a moderate inverse relation to QOL, whereas relationships between age, gender, length of injury, and QOL were nonsignificant. Despite having high SWB and RWB mean scores, the relationship between RWB and QOL was weak and nonsignificant; having faith in God and/or a Supreme Being played only a minor role in the person's perceived QOL. Having purpose and meaning in life, whatever the cause or causes, had a strong association with the person's perceived QOL. For some individuals, a strong faith in God may result in having purpose and meaning in life; for others, it may be having a strong support system, such as family, or having a productive meaningful job to go to each day. Further studies, including qualitative, to explore what constitutes a high QOL and what factors contribute to a sense of purpose and meaning for people living with paraplegia are needed. Rehabilitation nurses can help guide patients to the discovery of what brings purpose and meaning to their lives.

Significance to nursing

This study provides valuable information for nursing professionals caring for patients with SCI. A positive relationship between SWB and QOL has implications for spiritual care by clergy, nursing, and other healthcare team members during the rehabilitation phase and beyond. Whether a person is dealing with chronic illness, terminal illness, or a permanent disability, one's faith or spirituality may be questioned. Spiritual care is within a cultural context, has many dimensions, and rehabilitation nurses could provide interventions, such as recommending a spiritual advisor or chaplain or providing sources of meditation or inspiration. Music therapy, imagery, mindfulness, therapeutic touch, and active listening are other means of assisting patients to achieve a sense of spiritual well-being (Finocchiaro, 2008; O'Brien, 2007). Spiritual care can simply be helping the patient understand what provides him/her QOL; notably QOL is whatever the patient wants it to be (O'Brien, 2007). The rehabilitation nurse has the opportunity to help the patient understand this and to clarify what gives him or her wholeness and purpose in life. Further research exploring the effectiveness of other modalities or spiritual interventions to enhance a person's subjective QOL following a SCI is indicated.

Key Practice Points
  • Enhancing quality of life is a concern for people aging with SCI, as their life expectancy is increasing well into their 70s.
  • The primary predictor of quality of life for paraplegics was having purpose and meaning in life, whereas study participants having a high religious well-being did not necessarily have a higher subjective quality of life. Rehabilitation goals should include assisting patients to discover what brings meaning and purpose in their lives.
  • Performing a spiritual assessment should be part of the nurse's initial and ongoing patient assessment.
Earn nursing contact hours

Rehabilitation Nursing is pleased to offer readers the opportunity to earn nursing contact hours for its continuing education articles by taking a posttest through the ARN website. The posttest consists of questions based on this article, plus several assessment questions (e.g., how long did it take you to read the articles and complete the posttest?). A passing score on the posttest and completing of the assessment questions yield one nursing contact hour for each article.

To earn contact hours, go to www.rehabnurse.org and select the “Education” page. There you can read the article again, or go directly to the posttest assessment by selecting “RNJ online CE.” The cost for credit is $10 per article. You will be asked for a credit card or online payment service number.

Contact hours for this activity are available at no cost to ARN members for 60 days following the date the CE posttest is first available, after which time regular pricing will apply. The contact hours for this activity will not be available after December 31, 2016.

The Association of Rehabilitation Nurses is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation (ANCC-COA).

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction and Background
  4. Method
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Conclusions
  8. References
  • Barker, R.N., Kendall, M.D., Amsters, D.I., Pershouse, K.J., Haines, T.P., & Kuipers, P. (2009). The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 47, 149155.
  • Blanes, L., Carmagnani, I.S., & Ferreira, L.M. (2008). Quality of life and self-esteem of persons with paraplegia in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1521. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9411-9
  • Brillhart, B. (2005). A study of spirituality and life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Nursing, 30(1), 3134.
  • Charlifue, S., & Gerhart, K. (2004). Changing psychosocial morbidity in people aging with spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 1523.
  • Chlan, K.M., Zebracki, K., & Vogel, L.C. (2011). Spirituality and life satisfaction in adults with pediatric-onset spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 49, 371375.
  • Coleman, L.C. (2004). The contribution of religious and existential well-being to depression among African American heterosexuals with HIV infection. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27, 103110.
  • Comstock, G.W., & Helsing, K.J. (1976). Symptoms of depression in two communities. Psychology Medicine, 6, 551.
  • Delgado, C. (2007). Sense of coherence, spirituality, stress and quality of life in chronic illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(3), 229234.
  • Ellison, C.W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: conceptualizing and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330340.
  • Ellison, C.W., & Paloutzian, R.F. (1982). Spiritual Well-Being Scale. Nyack, NY: Life Advance.
  • Ferrans, C.E., & Powers, M.J. (1985). Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties. Advances in Nursing Science, 8, 1524.
  • Ferrell, B.R. (2005). Palliative care in advanced practice nursing. End of Life Nursing Education (ELNEC) Graduate Curriculum, Revised. Duarte, CA: City of Hope & American Association of Colleges of Nursing.
  • Ferrell, B.R., & Grant, M. (2000). Quality of Life Model. Duarte, CA: City of Hope National Medical Center.
  • Finocchiaro, D. (2008). Spirituality. In S.P. Hoeman (Ed.), Rehabilitation Nursing: Prevention, Intervention, & Outcomes (4th ed., pp. 594609). St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Elsevier.
  • Fuhrer, M.J., Rintala, D.H., Hart, K.A., Clearman, R., & Young, M.E. (1992). Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 73, 552557.
  • Fuhrer, M.J., Rintala, D.H., Hart, K.A., Clearman, R., & Young, M.E. (1993). Depressive symptomatology in persons with spinal cord injury who reside in the community. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 74, 255260.
  • Graf, N.M., Marini, I., Baker, J., & Buek, T. (2007). The perceived impact of religious and spiritual beliefs for persons with chronic pain. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57, 2133.
  • Hampton, N.Z. (2004). Subjective well-being among people with spinal cord injuries: the role of self-efficacy, perceived social support, and perceived health. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 48(1), 3137.
  • Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999). Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-depression (CES-D) scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 437443.
  • Hu, Y., Mak, J.N.F., Wong, Y.W., Leong, C.Y., & Luk, D.K. (2008). Quality of life of traumatic spinal cord injured patients in Hong Kong. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 126131.
  • Kemp, B., & Ettelson, D. (2001). Quality of life while living and aging with a spinal cord injury and other impairments. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 6(3), 116127.
  • Kemp, B., & Kahan, J. (1995). The Quality of Life Scale. Downey, CA: Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center.
  • Kemp, B., Krause, J.S., & Adkins, R. (1999). Depressive symptomatolgy among African American, Latino and Caucasian participants with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 44(3), 235247.
  • Krause, J.S. (2010). Aging, life satisfaction, and self-reported problems among participants with spinal cord injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 15(3), 3440. DOI: 10.1310/sci1503-34
  • Krause, J.S., Kemp, B., & Coker, J. (2000). Depression after spinal cord injury: relation to gender, ethnicity, aging, and socioeconomic indicators. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 81, 10991109.
  • Krause, J.S., Saladin, L.K., & Adkins, R.H. (2009). Disparities in subjective well-being, participation, and health after spinal cord injury: a 6-year longitudinal study. NeuroRehabilitation, 24, 4756. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0453
  • van Leuven, C.M.C., Post, M.W.M., van Asbeck, F.W.A., Bongers-Janssen, H.M.H., van der Woude, L.H.V., de Groot, S. et al. (2012). Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(1-2), 7683.
  • Lidal, I.B., Veenstra, M., Hjeltnes, N., & Biering-Sorensen, F. (2008). Health-related quality of life in persons with long standing spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 46, 710715.
  • Marini, I., & Glover-Graf, N.M. (2011). Religiosity and spirituality among persons with spinal cord injury: attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54(2), 8292. DOI: 10.1177/0034355210368868
  • Mathesis, E.N., Tulsky, D.S., & Mathesis, R.J. (2006). The relations between spirituality and quality of life among individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(3), 265271.
  • McColl, M.A., Bickenbach, J., Johnson, J., Nishihama, S., Schumaker, M., Smith, K. et al. (2000). Spiritual issues associated with traumatic-onset disability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(12), 555564.
  • Mertler, C.A., & Vannatta, R.A. (2009). Advanced and Multivariate Statistical Methods (4th ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak.
  • Miller, W.C., Anton, H.A., & Townson, A.F. (2008). Measurement properties of the CES-D scale among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 46, 287292.
  • Moberg, D.O., & Brusek, P.M. (1978). Spiritual well-being: a neglected subject in quality of life research. Social Indictors Research, 5, 303323.
  • National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2013). Spinal Cord Injury: Facts and Figures at a Glance. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.uab.edu/nscisc
  • O'Brien, M. E. (2007). Spirituality in Nursing: Standing on Holy Ground (3rd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 2, 164172.
  • Polit, D.F., & Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
  • Post, M.W.M., & van Leuven, C.M.C.. (2012). Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. International Spinal Cord Injury Society, 50, 382389.
  • Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measure, 1, 385401.
  • Rippentrop, A.E., Altmaier, E.M., & Burns, C.P. (2006). The relationship of religiosity and spirituality to quality of life among cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 13(1), 3137. DOI: 10.1007/s10880-005-9000-9
  • Saunders, L.L., Krause, J.S., & Focht, K.L. (2012). A longitudinal study of depression in survivors of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 50, 7277.
  • Song, H.Y., & Nam, K.A. (2010). Coping strategies, physical function, and social adjustment in people with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Nursing, 35, 815.
  • Tan, H., Wutthilert, C., & O'Connor, M. (2011). Spirituality and quality of life in older people with chronic illness in Thailand. Progress in Palliative Care, 19(4), 177184.