Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York
Version of Record online: 15 SEP 2010
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
River Research and Applications
Volume 28, Issue 2, pages 216–233, February 2012
How to Cite
Buchanan, B. P., Walter, M. T., Nagle, G. N. and Schneider, R. L. (2012), Monitoring and assessment of a river restoration project in central New York. River Res. Applic., 28: 216–233. doi: 10.1002/rra.1453
- Issue online: 26 JAN 2012
- Version of Record online: 15 SEP 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 JUL 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 18 MAY 2010
- Manuscript Received: 28 SEP 2009
- river restoration;
- instream structures;
- soil bioengineering
A widespread lack of post-project appraisals (PPAs) not only hinders progress in the field of river restoration but also limits the application of adaptive management – a powerful heuristic tool particularly well suited to dynamic fluvial environments. In an effort to contribute to the limited body of scientific literature pertaining to PPAs, we evaluated a stream restoration project completed in the fall of 2005 in central New York. Using a variety of evaluation approaches, we documented both successes (e.g. enhanced in-stream habitat) and short-comings (e.g. channel avulsions). Overall, we concluded that the project was marginally successful in achieving its stated goals and that future prospects remain uncertain based on current trajectory. Lessons learned from this monitoring study include: (i) protect vulnerable banks and floodplains until vegetation is established, e.g. via integrated bio- and geo-technical methods, (ii) perform scour depth analyses and excavate scour pools associated with hydraulic structures to design depth to prevent clogging of the channel during post-construction floods, (iii) orient bank vanes such that cross-stream flows are not deflected towards the bank, (iv) cross-validate restoration designs via multiple methods, including process-based sediment transport relations, especially in unstable gravel-bed rivers, (v) anticipate and fund for fixing natural channel design (NCD) projects for 3–5 years after completion to account for uncertainties and (vi) identify measurable, goal-specific success criteria that account for watershed scale stressors and site constraints prior to construction to facilitate successful project design and ensure effective outcomes appraisal. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.