SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Baker DW, Bledsoe BP, Albano CN, Poff NL. 2010. Downstream effects of diversion dams on sediment and hydraulic conditions of Rocky Mountain Streams. River Research and Applications. doi: 10.1002/rra.1376
  • Brittain JE, Saltveit SJ. 1989. A review of the effects of river regulation on mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 3: 191204.
  • Bunn SE, Arthington AH. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Mangagement 30: 492507.
  • Carlisle DM, Falcone J, Wolock DM, Norris RH. 2010. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams. River Research and Applications 26: 11836.
  • Carlisle DM, Wolock DM, Meador MR. 2011. Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: A multiregional assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9: 264270.
  • Collier M, Webb RH, Schmidt JC. 1996. Dams and rivers: Primer on the downstream effects of dams. Reston (VA): US Geological Survey. Circular no. 1126.
  • Dewson ZS, James ABW, Death RG. 2007. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 401415.
  • Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenburg AE (eds). 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, United Book Press, Inc.: Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379391.
  • Hawkins CP. 2006. Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: Its utility in regional and global assessments. Ecological Applications 16: 12771294.
  • Konrad CP, Brasher AMD, May JT. 2008. Assessing streamflow characteristics as limiting factors on benthic invertebrate assemblages in streams across the western United States. Freshwater Biology 53: 19831998.
  • Lessard JL, Hayes DB. 2003. Effects of elevated water temperature on fish and macroinvertebrate communities below small dams. River Research and Applications 19: 721732.
  • Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ. 1995. Downstream ecological effects of dams. BioScience 45: 183192.
  • Lloyd N, Quinn G, Thoms M, Arthingon AH, Gawne B, Humprhies P, Walker K. 2003. Does flow modification cause geomorphological and ecological responses in rivers? A literature review from an Australian perspective. Technical report 1/2004, CRC for Freshwater Ecology.
  • Lytle DA, Poff NL. 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 94100.
  • Merritt DM, Poff NL. 2010. Shifting dominance of riparian Populus and Tamarix along gradients of flow alteration in western North American rivers. Ecological Applications 20: 135152.
  • Olden JD, Naiman RJ. 2010. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity. Freshwater Biology 55: 86107.
  • Poff NL, Hart DD. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience 52: 659668.
  • Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH. 2010. Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55: 194205.
  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestgaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC. 1997. The natural flow regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47: 769784.
  • Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kennedy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O'Keefe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A. 2010. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55: 147170.
  • Porter SD, Cuffney TF, Gurtz ME, Meador MR. 1993. Methods for collecting algal samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-409, 39 pp.
  • Rader RB, Ward JV. 1988. Influence of regulation on environmental conditions and the macroinvertebrate community in the upper Colorado River. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 2: 597618.
  • Rehn AC. 2008. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of biological condition below hydropower dams on west slope Sierra Nevada streams, California, USA. River Research and Applications 25: 208228.
  • Resh VH, Jackson JK. 1993. Rapid assessment approaches to biomonitoring using benthic macroinvertebrates. In Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinverbrates, Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds). Chapman and Hall: New York; 195233.
  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP. 1997. How much water does a river need? Freshwater Biology 37: 231249.
  • Stoddard JL, Herlihy AT, Peck DV, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Tarquinio E. 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27: 878891.
  • Utah Department of Environmental Quality. 2010. Utah's 2010 Integrated Report: Part 1, methods for assessing and reporting the condition of lakes and streams. Division of Water Quality, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Vieira NKM, Poff NL, Carlisle DM, Moulton SR, Koski ML, Kondratieff BC. 2006. A database of lotic invertebrate traits for North America. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds187/
  • Ward JV. 1976. Comparative limnology of differentially regulated sections of a Colorado mountain river. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 78(3): 319342.
  • Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1979. Ecological factors controlling stream zoobenthos with emphasis on thermal modification of regulated streams. In The Ecology of Regulated Streams, Ward JV, Stanford JA (eds). Plenum Press: New York.
  • Wolman MG. 1954. A method of sampling course river-bed material. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 35: 951956.
  • Yuan L. 2006. Estimation and application of macroinvertebrate tolerance values. National Center for Environmental Assessment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/P-04/116 F, Washington, DC.
  • Zorn TG, Seelbach PW, Rutherford ES, Wills TC, Cheng ST, Wiley MJ. 2008. A regional-scale habitat suitability model to assess the effects of flow reduction on fish assemblages in Michigan streams. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division. Research Report 2089, Ann Arbor, Michigan.