Differential macrohabitat use by birds on the unregulated Ovens River floodplain of southeastern Australia

Authors

  • Amber Parkinson,

    1. Australian Centre for Biodiversity: Analysis, Policy and Management, School of Biological Sciences, PO Box 18, Monash University 3800, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ralph Mac Nally,

    Corresponding author
    1. Australian Centre for Biodiversity: Analysis, Policy and Management, School of Biological Sciences, PO Box 18, Monash University 3800, Victoria, Australia
    • Australian Centre for Biodiversity: Analysis, Policy and Management, School of Biological Sciences, PO Box 18, Monash University 3800, Victoria, Australia.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • G. P. Quinn

    1. Australian Centre for Biodiversity: Analysis, Policy and Management, School of Biological Sciences, PO Box 18, Monash University 3800, Victoria, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

In many lowland floodplains around the world, upriver interferences to flows (weirs, dams, off-takes) have led to much reduced frequency and duration of flooding. As a result, many floodplain wetlands are now inundated relatively rarely if at all. Given regulation of most lowland rivers in southeastern Australia, we assessed use of wetlands by birds in the essentially unregulated Ovens River in northeastern Victoria. Twelve sites (0.4–1.2 ha) were studied after flooding. Four sites were ‘permanent billabongs’, four were temporary wetlands and the other four were randomly selected woodland sites >60 m from the nearest water body (including the river) acting as ‘control’ or ‘reference’ sites. Aquatic birds were not recorded using woodland sites, but many species were differentially associated with either billabongs or temporary wetlands. A surprising number of non-aquatic birds either exclusively or differentially were associated with wetland sites compared with woodland sites. We concluded that heterogeneous macrohabitat will increase local avian biodiversity on lowland floodplains. Moreover, densities and diversity of non-aquatic, woodland species also increased with the presence of wetlands. Temporary wetlands were used differently from permanent billabongs by birds, especially in foraging methods. This suggests that the reinstatement of major flooding on heavily regulated floodplains would be ecologically advantageous for birds by providing foraging and breeding opportunities. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Ancillary