Review
A classification for community discovery methods in complex networks
Article first published online: 9 SEP 2011
DOI: 10.1002/sam.10133
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue

Statistical Analysis and Data Mining
Special Issue: Networks
Volume 4, Issue 5, pages 512–546, October 2011
Additional Information
How to Cite
Coscia, M., Giannotti, F. and Pedreschi, D. (2011), A classification for community discovery methods in complex networks. Statistical Analy Data Mining, 4: 512–546. doi: 10.1002/sam.10133
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2011
- Article first published online: 9 SEP 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 5 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 5 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Received: 1 AUG 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- community discovery;
- social network;
- groups;
- complex network;
- graph partitioning;
- graph clustering;
- graph mining;
- information propagation
Abstract
Many real-world networks are intimately organized according to a community structure. Much research effort has been devoted to develop methods and algorithms that can efficiently highlight this hidden structure of a network, yielding a vast literature on what is called today community detection. Since network representation can be very complex and can contain different variants in the traditional graph model, each algorithm in the literature focuses on some of these properties and establishes, explicitly or implicitly, its own definition of community. According to this definition, each proposed algorithm then extracts the communities, which typically reflect only part of the features of real communities. The aim of this survey is to provide a ‘user manual’ for the community discovery problem. Given a meta definition of what a community in a social network is, our aim is to organize the main categories of community discovery methods based on the definition of community they adopt. Given a desired definition of community and the features of a problem (size of network, direction of edges, multidimensionality, and so on) this review paper is designed to provide a set of approaches that researchers could focus on. The proposed classification of community discovery methods is also useful for putting into perspective the many open directions for further research. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 4: 512–546, 2011

1932-1872/asset/SAM_left.gif?v=1&s=95cbbe8824e1aaad351b489e115d8595305bcb3f)