Clinical efficiency and reusability of the reciprocating nickel–titanium instruments according to the root canal anatomy

Authors

  • Sung-Kyung Park,

    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Young-Jae Kim,

    1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Won-Jun Shon,

    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Sung-Yeop You,

    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Young-Mi Moon,

    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Daejeon Hospital, WonKwang University, Daejeon, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hyeon-Cheol Kim,

    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • WooCheol Lee

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
    • Address for reprints: WooCheol Lee, Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

      E-mail: jimin525@snu.ac.kr

    Search for more papers by this author

  • Drs. Sung-Kyung Park and Young-Jae Kim contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Summary

The application of the single-file technique using the reciprocating motion is gaining concern in root canal preparation. The purpose of this research is to compare the efficiency of the reciprocating motion-employing files (RECIPROC and WaveOne) by measuring the working time for complete canal shaping, and to evaluate their reusability under scanning examinations. One hundred curved root canals of the extracted molars were used. The working length was determined and the glide path was confirmed using a #15 K-file. Canals shaping was completed to the length either with RECIPROC R25 file (n = 50), or with WaveOne Primary file (n = 50). The time taken for the file to reach the working length was also measured. Each file was repeatedly used in a maximum of 10 canals for comparing the change of the efficiency (shaping time) according to the working length, canal curvature, and number of file re-use. The deformations or surface defects of the files after the in vitro use were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). There was no difference under the SEM between the 2 file groups with no initiation of micro-cracks until they were re-used up to 5 canals. WaveOne Primary file showed significantly shorter working time than RECIPROC R25 (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant correlation between the working time and three variables. As the working length and the curvature of the canal increased, the shaping time was increased in both file systems. Reusability of these reciprocating instruments might be maximum 5 canals with minimal surface deformations. SCANNING 36:246–251, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary