SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 10991114.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. (Reprinted 1986, New York: Werbel & Peck).
  • Bartow, S. T. (1981). Misconceptions in science concept learning. Unpublished MS Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Bascones, J., & Novak, J. D. (1985). Alternative instructional systems and the development of problem-solving skills in physics. European Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 253261.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Brown, A., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 3242.
  • Canas, A., Ford, K., Novak, J., Hayes, P., & Reichherzer (2001). Online concept maps: Enhancing collaborative learning by using technology with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 68(2), 4951, April.
  • Caravita, S., & Hallden, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89111.
  • Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Chi, M. T. H. (1994). Barriers to conceptual change in learning science concepts: A theoretical conjecture. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual cognitive science society conference, Boulder, CO.
  • Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121152.
  • DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Donaldson, M. C. (1978). Children's minds. New York: Norton.
  • Edmondson, K., & Novak, J. D. (1992). Toward an authentic understanding of subject matter. In S.Hills (Ed.), The history and philosophy of science in science education (Vol. 1, pp. 253263). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Queen's University, Faculty of Education, and the Mathematics, Science, Technology and Teacher Education Group.
  • Feldsine, J. E. Jr. (1987). Distinguishing student's misconceptions from alternative conceptual frameworks through construction of concept maps. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca, NY: Dept. of Education, Cornell University.
  • Feldsine, J. N. (1983). Concept mapping: A method for detection of possible student misconceptions. In H. Helm & J. D. Novak, Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca, NY, Department of Education, Cornell University.
  • Flavel, J. H. (1973). Metacogitive aspects of problem solving. In the nature of intelligence. L. B.Resnick (Ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Fuata'i, K. A. (1985). Use of vee maps and concept maps in learning form five mathematics. Unpublished M.S. Thesis, Cornell University.
  • Fuata'i, K. A. (1998). Learning to solve mathematics problems through concept mapping and Vee mapping. Apia, Samoa: The National University.
  • Gonzales, F. M., & Novak, J. D. (1993). Aprendizaje significativo technicas y aplicaciones. Serie: Educacion y Futuro no. 18. Madrid, Argentina: Editorial Cincels. A.
  • Gowin, D. B. (1981). Educating. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Haidar, A. H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teacher's conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 181197.
  • Hassard, J. (1992). Research in science education: Past, present, and future. In M.Gräber, A.Komarek, Kross, & P.Reiska (Eds.), Minds on science. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Helldén, G. (2001). Personal context and continuity of human thought; recurrent themes in a longitudinal study of pupils' understanding of scientific phenomena. In H.Behrendt, H.Dahncke, & R.Duit (Eds.), Research in science education: Past, present and future. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Helm, H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.) (1983). Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Department of Education, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
  • Jonassen, D. H., Beissser, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Jones, M. G., Rua, M. J., & Carter, G. (1998). Science teacher's conceptual growth within Vygotsky's zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 967985.
  • Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1998). Obstacles to understanding learning as situated. Educational Researcher, Nov. 27(8), 2228.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962, 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (1999). Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Macbeth, D. (2000). On actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education, 84, 228264.
  • Macnamara, J. T. (1982). Names for things: A study of human learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Marin, B. L., Mintzes, J. J., & Clavin, I. E. (2000). Restructuring knowledge in biology: Cognitive processes and metacognitive reflections. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 303323.
  • Metz, K. E. (1997). On the complex relation between cognitive developmental research and children's science curricula. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 5163.
  • Ministry of Education and Science (1989). Libro Blanco para la Reforma de Sistema Educactivo. Madrid, Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia.
  • Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. D. (1998). Teaching science for understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. D. (2000). Assessing science understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (2001). Assessing science understanding in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 119124.
  • Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Novak, J. D. (1979). Applying psychology and philosophy to the improvement of laboratory teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41(8), 466474.
  • Novak, J. D. (1983). Overview of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. In H. Helm & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics (pp. 14).
  • Novak, J. D. (1985). Metalearning and metaknowledge strategies to help students learn how to learn. In LeoH. T. West & A. LeonPines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 189209). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 2952.
  • Novak, J. D. (1992). Clarify with concept maps. The Science Teacher, 58(7), 4549.
  • Novak, J. D. (1993a). How do we learn our lesson. The Science Teacher, 60(3), 5155.
  • Novak, J. D. (1993b). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167193.
  • Novak, J. D. (1994). A view on the current status of Ausubel's assimilation theory of learning. CADMO: Giornale Italiano di Pedagogia, Sperimentale, Didattica, Docimologia, Tecnologia dell'instruzione, 2(4), 723.
  • Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Novak, J. D., & Iuli, R. I. (1995). Meaningful learning as the foundation for constructivist epistemology. In F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, & S. Fifield (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international history, philosophy and science teaching conference (Vol. 2, pp. 873896). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
  • Novak, J. D., & Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117153.
  • Novak, J. D., & Wandersee, J. H. (Eds.) (1990). Special issue: Concept mapping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 9211075.
  • Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81, 193215.
  • Pendley, B., Bretz, R. L., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Concept maps as a tool to assess instruction in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 915.
  • Pines, A. L., & Novak, J. D. (1985). The interaction of audio-tutorial instruction with student prior knowledge: A proposed qualitative case study methodology. Science Education, 69(2), 213228.
  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211227.
  • The Private Universe Project (M. Schneps, Director). (1989). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Smithsonian Institute for Astrophysics.
  • Rummelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C.Anderson, R. J.Spiro, & W. E.Montague (Eds.). Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science student's images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201219.
  • Ryle, G. (1949). Collected papers, Vol II. critical essays. London: Hutchinson.
  • Sadler, P. M. (2000). The relevance of multiple-choice tests in assessing science understanding. In J.Mintzes, J.Wandersee, & J. D.Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (pp. 249278).
  • Schmittau, J. (1991). A theory driven inquiry into the conceptual structure of multiplication. Focus on learning problems in mathematics, 13(4), 5064.
  • Schmittau, J. (1994). Connecting mathematical knowledge: A dialectical perspective. Journal of Mathematics Behavior.
  • Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553568.
  • Shymanski, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F., Thiele, R. B., Harrison, A., Waldrip, B. G., Stocklmayer, S. M., & Venville, G. M. (1997). Examining the construction process: A study of changes in level 10 student's understanding of classical mechanics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 571593.
  • Sneider, C. I., & Ohadi, M. M. (1998). Unraveling student's misconceptions about earth's shape and gravity. Science Education, 82(2), 265284.
  • Strike, K., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A.Duschl & R. J.Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding, Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Towns, M. H., & Grant, E. R. (1997). “I believe I will go out of this class actually knowing something”: Cooperative learning activities in physical chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(8), 819835.
  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P.Watzlanick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 1740). New York: Norton.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (edited and translated by Eugenia Hanfmann and Gertrude Vakar).
  • Waterman, M. A., & Rissler, J. F. (1982). Use of scientific research reports to develop higher-level cognitive skills. Journal of College Science Teaching, 11, 336340.