SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 673699.
  • Alters, B. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 3955.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bencze, J. L., & Bowen, M. G. (2001). Learner-controlled projects in science teacher education: Planting seeds for revolutionary change. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
  • Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1994). Lessons learned: A collaborative model for helping teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 539551.
  • Boardman-Haefner, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2001). Engaging in science as inquiry: Prospective elementary teachers' learning in the context of an innovative life science course. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
  • Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (1998, April). Isolation of variables and enculturation to a reductionist epistemology during ecology lectures. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Bryan, L. A., & Abell, S. K. (1999). The development of professional knowledge in learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 121139.
  • Carnes, G. N. (1997, March). Teacher conceptions of inquiry and related teaching practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.
  • Carter, K. (1990). Meaning and metaphor: Case knowledge in teaching. Theory into Practice, 24(2), 109115.
  • Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in practice. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Clandinin D. J., & Connelley, F. M. (1986). Rhythms in teaching: The narrative study of teachers' personal practical knowledge of classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 377387.
  • Clandinin D. J., & Connelley, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P., Jackson (Ed.), The handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363396). New York: Macmillan.
  • Crawford, B. A. (1998, April). Creating and sustaining an inquiry-based classroom: A different view of teachers' work. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, San Diego, CA.
  • Cruickshank, D. (1985). Uses and benefits of reflective teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 704706.
  • Cummins, C. (1993). Science fairs and teaching about the nature of science or “Would Charles Darwin have won a science fair?” Paper presented at the 1993 annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Buchmann, M. (1985). Pitfalls of experience in teacher preparation. Teachers College Record, 87, 5365.
  • Flick, L. B. (1995). Navigating a sea of ideas: Teachers and students negotiate a course toward mutual relevance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 10651082.
  • Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers' roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 1420.
  • Germann, P., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475499.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1970). Discovery of substantive theory. In W., Filstead (Ed.), Qualitative methodology (pp. 288297). Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Grossman, P., Wilson, S., & Shulman, L. (1989). Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M., Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 2334). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
  • Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific inquiry. School Review, 79, 171212.
  • Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 1940.
  • Johnston, M. (1994). Contrasts and similarities in case studies of teacher reflection and change. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(1), 926.
  • Kennison, C. (1990). Enhancing teachers' professional learning: Relationships between school culture and elementary school teachers' beliefs, images and ways of knowing. Unpublished specialist thesis, Florida State University.
  • Keys, C., & Bryan, L. (2000, April). Inquiry science and the social context of the classroom: A call for research on teacher understanding. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Keys, C., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the scientific writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 10651084.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (1991, April). Characteristics of reflective practitioners: Towards an operationalization of the concept of reflection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Liston, D., & Zeichner, K. (1987). Reflective teacher education and moral deliberation. Journal of Teacher Education, 38, 28.
  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Marshall, H. (1990). Metaphor as an instructional tool in encouraging student teacher reflection. Theory Into Practice, 24(2), 128131.
  • McGinn, M., & Roth, W.-M. (1999). Preparing students for competent scientific practice: Implications of recent research in science and technology studies. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 1424.
  • Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. (1996).
  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • National Science Teachers Association (1995). Scope, sequence, and coordination of secondary school science (Vol. II). Washington, DC.
  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317328.
  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307332.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparisons of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77, 261278.
  • Roth, W. M. (1999). Scientific research expertise from middle school to professional practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
  • Russell, T. (1993). Learning to teach science: Constructivism, reflection, and learning from experience. In K.Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism. (pp. 247258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Russell, T., & Johnston, P. (1988, April). Teachers learning from experiences of teaching: Analyses based on metaphor and reflection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as inquiry. In J. J.Schwab & P. F.Brandweine (Eds.), The teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schwab, J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I.Westbury & N. J.Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and liberal education (pp. 229272). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1961.)
  • Shapiro, B. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “Face of science that does not yet know.” Science Education, 80(5), 535560.
  • Tafoya, E., Sunal, D., & Knecht, P. (1980). Assessing inquiry potential: A tool for curriculum decision makers. School Science and Mathematics, 80, 4348.
    Direct Link:
  • Tamir, P. (1983). Inquiry and the science teacher. Science Education, 67(5), 657672.
  • Tashiro, L., & Jelinek, D. (2001). The effect of inquiry on college students' abilities to pose testable scientific questions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
  • Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research in instructional strategies for teaching science. In D.Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 4393). New York: Macmillan.
  • Tom, A. (1985). Inquiry into inquiry-oriented teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 3544.
  • Trumbull, D., & Kerr, P. (1993). University researchers' inchoate critiques of science teaching: Implications for the content of preservice science teacher education. Science Education, 77(3), 301317.
  • US Department of Education (1999). Student work and teacher practices in science. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
  • Valli, I. (1992). Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2000). Fostering collaborative research by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Welch, W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G., & Robinson, J. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 3350.
  • Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(3), 233269.
  • Windschitl, M. (2000, April). An analysis of preservice science teachers' open inquiry experiences. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
  • Zeichner, K. (1990). Changing directions in the practicum: Looking ahead to the 1990's. Journal of Education for Teaching, 16(2), 105131.
  • Zeichner, K., & Tabachnick, R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education washed out by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 711.