SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abell, S. K., & Bryan, L. A. (1997). Reconceptualizing the elementary science methods course using a reflection orientation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8, 153166.
  • Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82, 491510.
  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers' professional knowledge landscapes: Teacher stories–stories of teachers–school stories–stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 2430.
  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Doris, E. (1991). Doing what scientists do: Children learn to investigate their world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Erickson, G. L., & MacKinnon, G. L. (1991). Seeing classrooms in new ways: On becoming a science teacher. In D.A.Schön (Ed.), The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers. York, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Katz, L., & Chard, S. (1989). Engaging children's minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Krajcik, J. S., & Layman, J. W. (1993). Micro-computer based laboratories in the science classroom. National Research in Science Teaching Newsletter, 31, 36.
  • Lay, D. (2000a). Engaging fourth grade readers in science. Ethnography in Education Research Forum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Lay, D. (2000b). Science inquiry conference: A better way. In J.Minstrell & E.H.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Layman, J. (1996). Inquiry and learning: Realizing science standards in the classroom. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board.
  • Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “at rest” condition of an object. Physics Teacher, 20, 1014.
  • Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students' knowledge and relevant instruction. In R.Duit, F.Goldberg, & H.Niedderer (Eds.) Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Kiel, Germany: IPN (Institute for Science Education).
  • National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nichols, S. E., Wieseman, K., & Tippins, D. (1997). A toolkit for developing critically reflective science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(2), 77106.
  • Pearce, C. (1993). What if … ? In W.Saul, J.Reardon, A.Schmidt, C.Pearce, D.Blackwood, & M.Bird (Eds.), Science workshop: A whole language approach. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Pearce, C. (1999). Nurturing inquiry: Real science for the elementary classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Pekarek, R., Krockover, G. H., & Shepardson, D. P. (1996). The research-practice gap in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 111114.
  • Reardon, J. (1993). A community of scientists. In W.Saul, J.Reardon, A.Schmidt, C.Pearce, D.Blackwood, & M.Bird (Eds.), Science workshop: A whole language approach. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Roberts, D. (1999). The sky's the limit: Parents and first grade students observe the sky. Science and Children, 37, 3337.
  • Roberts, D. (2000a, March). On the move: Using microcomputer-based laboratories with students and teachers. Ethnography in Education Research Forum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
  • Roberts, D. (2000b). Teacher research: A new teacher's journey. In J.Minstrell and E. H.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 120129). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Saul, W., Reardon, J., Schmidt, A., Pearce, C., Blackwood, D., & Bird, M. (1993). Science workshop: A whole language approach. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  • Schön, D. A. (1988). Coaching reflective teaching. In P. P.Grimmett & G. L.Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 1929). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • van Zee, E. H. (1998a). Fostering elementary teachers' research on their science teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 245254.
  • van Zee, E. H. (1998b). Preparing teachers as researchers in courses on methods of teaching science. Journal of Research on Science Teaching, 35, 791809.
  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a high school physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 209228.
  • van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 229271.
  • van Zee, E. H., & Roberts, D. (2001). Using pedagogical inquiries as a basis for learning to teach: Prospective teachers' perceptions of positive science learning experiences. Science Education, 85, 733757.
  • Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3), 4245.
  • Zeichner, K. (1999). The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 415.