SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665701.
  • Akerson, V., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295317.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Barab, S. A., & Hay, K. E. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 70102.
  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002, April). Teaching pupils “ideas-about-sciences”: Case studies from the classroom. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
  • Bell, R. L. (2000). Understandings of the nature of science and decision-making on science and technology based issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Oregon.
  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on students' understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487509.
  • Bianchini, J., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: A tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177209.
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 3242.
  • Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching science as inquiry. In J.Minstrell, & E.van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 2046). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., & Unger, C. (1989). “An experiment is when you try it and see if it works”: A study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514529.
  • Carey, S., & Smith, D. (1993). On understanding the nature of scientific knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 28(3), 235251.
  • Casti, J. (1989). Paradigms lost: Images of man in the mirror of science. New York: Morrow.
  • Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? New York: University of Queensland Press.
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175219.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554567.
  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121133.
  • Glasson, G., & Bentley, M. (2000). Epistemological undercurrents in scientists' reporting of research to teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 84(4), 469485.
  • Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171212.
  • Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72(1), 1940.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry oriented instruction on sixth graders views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551578.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Krajcik, J., Blumengeld, P., Marx, R., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483498.
  • Krathwohl, D. (1998). Methods of educational & social science research: An integrated approach (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1987). In J.Worrall, & G.Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331359.
  • Lederman, N. G. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(2).
  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W.McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83126). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497521.
  • Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers' understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An intervention study. The Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135160.
  • Loving, C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education's journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 421452.
  • Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: Kings College.
  • Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
  • National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Paris, S., & Ayres, L. (1994). Becoming reflective students and teachers with portfolios and authentic assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261278.
  • Posner, J., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a science conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211227.
  • Ramsey, G. A., & Howe, R. W. (1969). An analysis of research on instructional procedures in secondary school science, Part I: Outcomes of instruction. The Science Teacher, 36(3), 6270.
  • Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. A. (1999). Moving from outside to inside: High school students' use of apprenticeships as vehicles for entering the culture and practice of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 677697.
  • Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3(7), 799815.
  • Robinson, J. T. (1969). Philosophy of science: Implications for teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 99104.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. (1997). From “truth” to “invented reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 145179.
  • Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127152.
  • Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 8084.
  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559580.
  • Ryder, J., Leach, J., & Driver, R. (1999). Undergraduate science students' images of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(2), 201220.
  • Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J.Schwab, & P. F.Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It's the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205236.
  • Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W.Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.
  • Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349422.
  • Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493509.
  • Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G., & Robinson, J. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65(1), 3350.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Meaning, learning, and identity. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yager, R. (1997). Science education a science? Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 14.