SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Allchin, D. (1996a). Christiaan Eijkman and the cause of beriberi. In J. B.Hagen, D.Allchin, & F.Singer, Doing biology (pp. 116127). Glenview, IL: Harper Collins.
  • Allchin, D. (1996b). Points east and west: Acupuncture and comparative philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 63, S107S115.
  • Allchin, D. (1999). Do we see through a social microscope?: Credibility as a vicarious selector. Philosophy of Science, 60(Proceedings), S287S298.
  • Allchin, D. (2000). How not to teach historical case studies in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 3337.
  • Allchin, D. (2001). Error types. Perspectives on Science, 9, 3859.
  • Allchin, D. (2003). Pseudohistory and pseudoscience. Science and Education, 12, 341357.
  • Angier, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (1993). Discovering complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bickard, M. H. (1997). Constructivisms and relativisms: A shopper's guide. Science and Education, 6, 2942.
  • Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 11641172.
  • Brush, S. G. (2002). Cautious revolutionaries: Maxwell, Planck, Hubble. American Journal of Physics, 70, 119128.
  • Chalmers, A. (1990). What is this thing called science? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Cole, S. (1992). Making science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Collins, H. (1985). Changing order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (1993). The golem. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Darden, L. (1991). Theory change in science: Strategies from Mendelian genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Davson-Galle, P. (2002). Science, values and objetivity. Science and Education, 11, 191202.
  • Dolby, R. G. A. (1996). A theory of pathological science. In Uncertain knowledge (pp. 227244). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Editor (1997). Science wars and the need for respect and rigour. Nature, 385, 373.
  • Elfin, J. T., Glennan, S., & Reisch, G. (1999). The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 107116.
  • Fee, E. (1979). Nineteenth-century craniology: The study of the female skull. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 53, 415433.
  • Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C. L. (1999). Communicating uncertainty. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Fuller, S. (1988). 1988. Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science and Education, 6, 1528.
  • Gieryn, T. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1992). Liaisons: Philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldman, A. I. (2002). Pathways to knowledge: Public and private. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Good, R., & Shymansky, J. (2001). Nature-of-science literacy in Benchmarks and Standards: Post-modern/relativist or modern/realist? Science and Education, 10, 173185.
  • Gould, S. J. (1980). Wide hats and narrow minds. In The panda's thumb (pp. 145151). New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Gould, S. J. (1983). Science and Jewish immigration. In Hen's teeth and horse's toes (pp. 291302). New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Grandy, R. E. (1997). Constructivisms and objectivity: Disentangling metaphysics from pedagogy. Science and Education, 6, 4353.
  • Guinta, C. J. (2001). Using history to teach scientific method: The role of errors. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 623627.
  • Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 693708.
  • Hess, D. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  • Holton, G. (1978). On the psychology of scientists, and their social concerns. In The scientific imagination: Case studies (pp. 229252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hull, D. (1988). Science as a process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Irzik, G., & Irzik, S. (2002). Which multiculturalism? Science and Education, 11, 393403.
  • Jardine, N., & Frasca-Spada, M. (1997). Splendours and miseries of the science wars. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 28, 219233.
  • Johnston, A. T., & Southerland, S. A. (2000). The multiple meanings of tentative science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (paper no. 66, CD-ROM, Denver, CO).
  • Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W., & Cunningham, C. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context. Science Education, 77, 207220.
  • Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univeristy Press.
  • Longino, H. (2001). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Lyons, S. (1998). Science or pseudoscience: Phrenology as a cautionary tale for evolutionary psychology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 41(4), 491503.
  • Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Moss, L. (2002). What genes can't do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (1995). On being a scientist (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Norris, S. P. (1997). Intellectual independence for nonscientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education, 81, 239258.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692720.
  • Papacosta, P. (2000). The importance of the fallibility of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference (paper no. 113, CD-ROM, Denver, CO).
  • Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pickering, A. (1992). Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Roth, W.-M. (1997). From everyday science to science education: How science and technology studies inspired curriculum design and classroom research. Science and Education, 6, 373396.
  • Rousseau, D. L. (1992). Case studies in pathological science. American Scientist, 80, 5463.
  • Rowell, J. A., & Pollard, J. M. (1995). Raising awareness of uncertainty. Science and Education, 4, 8797.
  • Sclove, R. E. (1998). Better approaches to science policy. Science, 279, 1283.
  • Segerstråk, U. (Ed.) (2000). Beyond the science wars. Albany, NY: State Univeristy of New York Press.
  • Service, R. F. (2002). Bell Labs fires star physicist found guilty of forging data. Science, 298, 3031.
  • Service, R. F. (2003). More of Bell Labs physicist papers retracted. Science, 299, 31.
  • Shapin, S. (1979). The politics of observation: Cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes. Sociological Review Monographs, 27, 13978.
  • Shapin, S. (1996). A social history of truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Slezak, P. (1994). Sociology of scientific knowledge and scientific education. Science and Education, 3, 265294, 329–355.
  • Solomon, J. (1987). Social influences on the construction of pupils' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 14, 6382.
  • Solomon, M. (2001). Social empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Toumey, C. (1996). Conjuring science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Vogel, G., Proffitt, F., & Stone, R. (2004). Ecologists roiled by misconduct case. Science, 303, 606609.