SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M. G., & Keating, T. (2000). Virtual solar system project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 719756.
  • Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2002). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87, 454467.
  • Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). Online question-posing and peer-assessment as means for Web-based knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1), 84103. Available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/ (June 2004).
  • Barak, M., & Raz, E. (2000). Hot-air balloons: Project-centered study as a bridge between science and technology education. Science Education, 84(1), 2742.
  • Barnea, N., & Dori, Y. J. (1999). High-school chemistry student's performance and gender differences in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(4), 257271.
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J. S., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating useable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149164.
  • Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential effects of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 911927.
  • Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. E. (2003). Learners' mental models of metallic bonding: A cross-age study. Science Education, 87, 685707.
  • Copolo, C. F., & Hounshell, P. B. (1995). Using three-dimensional models to teach molecular structures in high school chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4, 295305.
  • Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916937.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 128) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Donovan, W. J., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2001). Students' use of web-based tutorial materials and their understanding of chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 975980.
  • Dori, Y. J. (2003a). From nationwide standardized testing to school-based alternative embedded assessment in Israel: Students' performance in the “Matriculation 2000” project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 3452.
  • Dori, Y. J. (2003b). A framework for project-based assessment in science education. In M.Segers, F.Dochy, & E.Cascallar (Eds.), Optimizing new modes of assessment. In search of qualities and standards (pp. 89118). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Barak, M. (2001). Virtual and physical molecular modeling: Fostering model perception and spatial understanding. Educational Technology & Society, 4(1), 6174. Available at: http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_1_2001/dori.pdf
  • Dori, Y. J., Barak, M., & Adir, N. (2003). A Web-based chemistry course as a means to foster freshmen learning. Chemical Education, 80(9), 10841092.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Hameiri, M. (2003). Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems: Symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 278302.
  • Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84, 95113.
  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 512.
  • Eylon, B. S. (2000). Designing powerful learning environments and practical theories: The knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 885890.
  • Finarelli, M. G. (1998). GLOBE: A worldwide environmental science and education partnership. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(1), 7784.
  • Foust, R. D., Cruickshank, B., Stringer, M., & Olander, J. (1999). The benefits of using web-based enhancements in an environmental chemistry class. The Chemical Educator, 4(3), 108111. Available at: http://chemeducator.org/tocs/t9004003.htm (June 2004).
  • Gabel, D. (1998). The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B. J.Fraser & K. G.Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 233248). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  • Gabel, D. L., Briner, D., & Haines, D. (1992). Modeling with magnets—a unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, 41, 5863.
  • Gabel, D. L., & Sherwood, R. (1980). The effect of student manipulation of molecular models on chemistry achievements according to piagetian level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 7581.
  • Garnett, P. J., Tobin, K., & Swingler, D. J. (1985). Reasoning abilities of Western Australian secondary school students. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 387397.
  • Garrison, S. (1999). Dual perspectives on the effectiveness of project-based learning in an online environment. Available at: http://leahi.kcc.hawaii.edu/org/tcon99/papers/garrison1.html.
  • Gordin, D. N., Gomez, L. M., Pea, R. D., & Fishman, B. J. (1997). Using the world wide web to build learning communities in K-12. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(3). Available at: http://ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/gordin.htm (June 2004). M. L.McLaughlin (Ed.), Annenberg School for Communication, University of Southern California, L.A.
  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352381.
  • ISIS-draw, MDL (2000). Available at: http://www.mdli.com/ (June 2004).
  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 7583.
  • Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry—logical or psychological? Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1, 915. Available at: http://www.uoi.gr/conf_sem/cerapie2/index.html (June 2004).
  • Kantardjieff, K. A., Hardinger, S. A., & Van Willis, W. (1999). Introducing chemical computation early in the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 694697.
  • Klein, E. S., & Merritt, E. (1994). Environment education as a model for constructivist teaching. Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 1419.
  • Kozma, R. B. (1999). The use of multiple representations and the social construction of understanding in chemistry. In M. J.Jacobson & R. B.Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education (pp. 1146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Kozma, R. B., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry instruction. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105143.
  • Kozma, R. B., & Russell, J. (1997). Multimedia and understanding: Expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 949968.
  • Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313350.
  • Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, M. C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach (pp. 525). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  • Linn, M. C. (2000). Designing the knowledge integration environment: The partnership inquiry process. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781796.
  • Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87, 517538.
  • Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajick, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 341358.
  • Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 517538.
  • McDonald, J., & Czerniak, M. C. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary units: Strategies and examples. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 510.
  • Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 459479.
  • Murov, S. (2001). Exploring chemistry resources on the Internet. Journal of Chemical Education. 78, 14291432.
  • Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223238.
  • Reid, N. (1999). The presentation of chemistry logically driven or applications led? Paper presented at and abstract published in Proceedings of the 5th ECRIC, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Ruopp, R., Gal, S., Drayton, B., & Pfister, M. (1993). LabNet: Toward a community of practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H. C., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schneider, D., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2002). Performance of students in project-based science classrooms on a national measure of science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 410422.
  • Smith, K. A. (1998). Grading cooperative projects. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 5967.
  • Songer, N. B., Lee, H.-S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 128150.
  • Sudweeks, F., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). How do you get a hundred strangers to agree: Computer mediated communication and collaboration. In T. M.Harrison & T. D.Stephen (Eds.), Computer networking and scholarship in the 21st century university (pp. 115136). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Tal, R. T., & Hochberg, N. (2003). Assessing high order thinking of students participating in a web-based malaria project. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29(2), 6989.
  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning executive summary. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation. Available at: http://www.k12reform.org/foundation/pbl/research (June 2004).
  • Tinker, R. (1996). Thinking about science. The Concord Consortium, Inc. Available at: http://www.concord.org/pubs/pdf/ThAbSci.pdf (June 2004).
  • van Zee, E., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87(4), 588612.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In M.Cole, J.Steiner, S.Scribner, & E.Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112143.
  • WebLaB Viewer, MSI (2000). Available at: http://www.msi.com/life/products/weblab/viewer/index.html. The current version is DS ViewerPro 5.0, Accelrys (2004). Available at: http://www.accelrys.com/dstudio/ds_viewer/ (June 2004).
  • Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 821842.