An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA, March, 2003.
Science Teacher Education
Version of Record online: 7 APR 2005
Copyright © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 89, Issue 3, pages 492–516, May 2005
How to Cite
Varelas, M., House, R. and Wenzel, S. (2005), Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Sci. Ed., 89: 492–516. doi: 10.1002/sce.20047
The data presented, statements made, and views expressed in this paper are solely the responsibilities of the authors.
This paper was edited by former Section Editor Deborah Trumbull.
- Issue online: 26 APR 2005
- Version of Record online: 7 APR 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 AUG 2004
- Manuscript Revised: 1 JUL 2004
- Manuscript Received: 15 MAR 2004
- NSF-DUE grant (UIC-Community College Collaborative for Excellence in Teacher Preparation).. Grant Number: 9852167
We use identity as a multidimensional lens to explore ways in which beginning teachers saw themselves as scientists and as science teachers during and after 10-week summer apprenticeships at a science lab. Data included four interviews with each teacher, three during the apprenticeship and one after the first year of teaching. Two themes emerged that were used to organize the findings: (a) science as a practice and (b) science as a community of practice. Teachers came to appreciate certain science practices, speech acts, and tools. As scientists, they noticed and engaged in the nonlinearity, messiness, risk taking, evolution over time, and complexity of science (their own and others'), and in both levels of scientific activity, theory and data, and their interplay. Their scientist identity also came to incorporate the delicate dynamics of collaboration, autonomy, and mentoring within a community. However, for several reasons the teachers raised, such practices became elements of their science teacher identities to differing degrees. What they experienced as science teachers was a sense of conflict. At times this conflict took the form of ambivalence, a back-and-forth movement between their sense of the practice of science and their sense of what makes school different from the lab. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed, 89:492–516, 2005