SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    GARD OVE SØRVIK, MARTE BLIKSTAD-BALAS, MARIANNE ØDEGAARD, “Do Books Like These Have Authors?” New Roles for Text and New Demands on Students in Integrated Science-Literacy Instruction, Science Education, 2015, 99, 1
  2. 2
    AJAY SHARMA, CORY A. BUXTON, Human–Nature Relationships in School Science: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Middle-Grade Science Textbook, Science Education, 2015, 99, 2
  3. 3
    Mohammadreza Moohebat, Ram Gopal Raj, Sameem Binti Abdul Kareem, Dirk Thorleuchter, Identifying ISI-indexed articles by their lexical usage: A text analysis approach, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66, 3
  4. 4
    Catherine L. O’Hallaron, Annemarie S. Palincsar, Mary J. Schleppegrell, Reading science: Using systemic functional linguistics to support critical language awareness, Linguistics and Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Margarita Huerta, Beverly J. Irby, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Fuhui Tong, Relationship Between Language and Concept Science Notebook Scores of English Language Learners and/or Economically Disadvantaged Students, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kihyun Ryoo, Teaching Science Through the Language of Students in Technology-Enhanced Instruction, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 1, 29

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Gloriana González, The use of linguistic resources by mathematics teachers to create analogies, Linguistics and Education, 2015, 30, 81

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Lay Hoon Seah, Understanding the Conceptual and Language Challenges Encountered by Grade 4 Students When Writing Scientific Explanations, Research in Science Education, 2015,

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Hendrik Härtig, Sascha Bernholt, Helmut Prechtl, Jan Retelsdorf, Unterrichtssprache im Fachunterricht – Stand der Forschung und Forschungsperspektiven am Beispiel des Textverständnisses, Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 2015,

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Bryan D. Spiegelberg, A focused assignment encouraging deep reading in undergraduate biochemistry, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 2014, 42, 1
  11. 11
    KRISTIN NELLENBACH, JENNIFER ZOSKI, JOY DIAMOND, KAREN ERICKSON, A graphomorphemic approach to identifying and selecting a set of high utility, stable affixes common to the technical vocabulary of science, Applied Psycholinguistics, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Fuhui Tong, Beverly J. Irby, Rafael Lara-Alecio, Cindy Guerrero, Yinan Fan, Margarita Huerta, A Randomized Study of a Literacy-Integrated Science Intervention for Low-Socio-economic Status Middle School Students: Findings from first-year implementation, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 12, 2083

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Hsiu-Ting Yang, Kuo-Hua Wang, A Teaching Model for Scaffolding 4th Grade Students’ Scientific Explanation Writing, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 4, 531

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Youngjin Song, Shannon Carheden, Dual meaning vocabulary (DMV) words in learning chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2014, 15, 2, 128

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Lauren Honeycutt Swanson, Julie A. Bianchini, Jin Sook Lee, Engaging in argument and communicating information: A case study of english language learners and their science teacher in an urban high school, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014, 51, 1
  16. 16
    Wendy Bastalich, Monica Behrend, Robert Bloomfield, Is non-subject based research training a ‘waste of time’, good only for the development of professional skills? An academic literacies perspective, Teaching in Higher Education, 2014, 19, 4, 373

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Yuen Yi Lo, L2 learning opportunities in different academic subjects in content-based instruction – evidence in favour of ‘conventional wisdom’, Language and Education, 2014, 28, 2, 141

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Xavier Fazio, Tiffany L. Gallagher, MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LEVELS OF SCIENCE CONTENT VOCABULARY: IMPLICATIONS FOR SCIENCE-BASED TEXTS IN ELEMENTARY CLASSROOMS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2014, 12, 6, 1407

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Danielle B. Harlow, Lauren H. Swanson, Valerie K. Otero, Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Analysis of Children’s Science Talk in an Undergraduate Physics Course, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2014, 25, 1, 97

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    ISABEL BRAUN, MATTHIAS NÜCKLES, Scholarly Holds Lead Over Popular and Instructional: Text Type Influences Epistemological Reading Outcomes, Science Education, 2014, 98, 5
  21. 21
    Karin Thörne, Niklas Gericke, Teaching Genetics in Secondary Classrooms: a Linguistic Analysis of Teachers’ Talk About Proteins, Research in Science Education, 2014, 44, 1, 81

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Loene M. Howes, Roberta Julian, Sally F. Kelty, Nenagh Kemp, K. Paul Kirkbride, The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of DNA analysis, Forensic Science International, 2014, 237, 7

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Loene M. Howes, K. Paul Kirkbride, Sally F. Kelty, Roberta Julian, Nenagh Kemp, The readability of expert reports for non-scientist report-users: Reports of forensic comparison of glass, Forensic Science International, 2014, 236, 54

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Lay Hoon Seah, David John Clarke, Christina Eugene Hart, Understanding the Language Demands on Science Students from an Integrated Science and Language Perspective, International Journal of Science Education, 2014, 36, 6, 952

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Lindsay Blau Portnoy, Mitchell Rabinowitz, What's in a domain: understanding how students approach questioning in history and science, Educational Research and Evaluation, 2014, 20, 2, 122

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Jean R. Aguilar-Valdez, Carlos A. LópezLeiva, Deborah Roberts-Harris, Diane Torres-Velásquez, Gilberto Lobo, Carol Westby, Ciencia en Nepantla: the journey of Nepantler@s in science learning and teaching, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2013, 8, 4, 821

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    KARIN THÖRNE, NIKLAS M. GERICKE, MARIANA HAGBERG, Linguistic Challenges in Mendelian Genetics: Teachers’ Talk in Action, Science Education, 2013, 97, 5
  28. 28
    Laura B. Smolkin, Erin M. McTigue, Yi-fen Y. Yeh, Searching for Explanations in Science Trade Books: What can we learn from Coh-Metrix?, International Journal of Science Education, 2013, 35, 8, 1367

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Bülent Pekdağ, Nursen Azizoğlu, Semantic mistakes and didactic difficulties in teaching the “amount of substance” concept: a useful model, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2013, 14, 1, 117

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Eva Thomm, Rainer Bromme, “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information, Science Education, 2012, 96, 2
  31. 31
    Chan-Jong Kim, Eun-Ji Park, Sae-Yeol Yoon, Sun-Kyung Lee, Descriptive Characteristics of the Label Texts Related to Earth Science: Toward Educationally Meaningful Communication, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2012, 33, 1, 94

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Jing-Ru Wang, Shin-Feng Chen, Reuy-Fen Tsay, Ching-Ting Chou, Sheau-Wen Lin, Huey-Lien Kao, DEVELOPING A TEST FOR ASSESSING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION OF SCIENCE TEXTS, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2012, 10, 4, 955

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Sultan Turkan, Ou Lydia Liu, Differential Performance by English Language Learners on an Inquiry-Based Science Assessment, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 15, 2343

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    Vassiliki (“Vicky) I. Zygouris-Coe, Disciplinary Literacy and the Common Core State Standards, Topics in Language Disorders, 2012, 32, 1, 35

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    Edwin van Lacum, Miriam Ossevoort, Hendrik Buikema, Martin Goedhart, First Experiences with Reading Primary Literature by Undergraduate Life Science Students, International Journal of Science Education, 2012, 34, 12, 1795

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Susan L. Jagger, Larry D. Yore, Mind the Gap: Looking for Evidence-Based Practice of Science Literacy for All in Science Teaching Journals, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 2012, 23, 6, 559

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Ana Taboada, Relationships of general vocabulary, science vocabulary, and student questioning with science comprehension in students with varying levels of English proficiency, Instructional Science, 2012, 40, 6, 901

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    Michael J. Kennedy, Frances M. Ihle, The Old Man and the Sea: Navigating the Gulf between Special Educators and the Content Area Classroom, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 2012, 27, 1
  39. 39
    U. Ramnarain, P. Molefe, The readiness of high school students to pursue first year physics, Africa Education Review, 2012, 9, 1, 142

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    Do-Young Kang, Myung-Hwan Shin, Pil-Yeo Shin, Hat-Nim We, Kyung-Uk Yun, Chan-Ho Yang, Ji-Yeong Kim, Hyun-Sik Min, Tae-Hee Noh, Chan-Jong Kim, The Types of Interlanguage of Middle School Students in the Process of Learning Diastrophism, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2012, 33, 1, 59

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Hyun-Jung Cha, Chan-Jong Kim, Seung-Ho Maeng, Linguistic Characteristics of Middle School Students' Writing on Earth Science Themes Through Analysis of Its Genre and Register, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2011, 32, 1, 84

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    Kok-Sing Tang, REASSEMBLING CURRICULAR CONCEPTS: A MULTIMODAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2011, 9, 1, 109

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Kok-Sing Tang, Seng Chee Tan, Jennifer Yeo, Students’ Multimodal Construction of the Work–Energy Concept, International Journal of Science Education, 2011, 33, 13, 1775

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Lay Hoon Seah, David J. Clarke, Christina E. Hart, Understanding students' language use about expansion through analyzing their lexicogrammatical resources, Science Education, 2011, 95, 5
  45. 45
    Myung-Hwan Shin, Seung-Ho Maeng, Chan-Jong Kim, A Comparative Analysis of the Linguistic Features of Texts used in the unit of Volcano and Earthquake in Korean Elementary and Secondary School Science Textbooks, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2010, 31, 1, 36

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Brian Hand, Larry D. Yore, Susan Jagger, Vaughan Prain, Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: a review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998–2008, Studies in Science Education, 2010, 46, 1, 45

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Larry D. Yore, Brian Hand, Epilogue: Plotting a Research Agenda for Multiple Representations, Multiple Modality, and Multimodal Representational Competency, Research in Science Education, 2010, 40, 1, 93

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Zhihui Fang, Youhua Wei, Improving Middle School Students’ Science Literacy Through Reading Infusion, The Journal of Educational Research, 2010, 103, 4, 262

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    Bryan A. Brown, Kihyun Ryoo, Jamie Rodriguez, Pathway Towards Fluency: Using ‘disaggregate instruction’ to promote science literacy, International Journal of Science Education, 2010, 32, 11, 1465

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    Eun-Sook Jung, Chan-Jong Kim, Preliminary Research about Semantic Relations and Linguistic Features in Middle School Students' Writings about Phase Transitions of Water in Air, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2010, 31, 3, 288

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Seok-Jin Ham, Seung-Ho Maeng, Chan-Jong Kim, Science Popularizing Mechanism of a Science Magazine in terms of the Linguistic Features of Earth Science Articles in 'Science Donga', Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2010, 31, 1, 51

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Seung-Ho Maeng, Myung-Hwan Shin, Hyun-Jung Cha, Seok-Jin Ham, Hyeon-Jeong Shin, Chan-Jong Kim, Understanding of the Linguistic Features of Earth Science Treatises: Register Analysis Approach, Journal of the Korean earth science society, 2010, 31, 7, 785

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    B.A. Brown, J.W. Mutegi, International Encyclopedia of Education, 2010,

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    Nicole J. Glen, Sharon Dotger, Elementary teachers’ use of language to label and interpret science concepts, Journal of Elementary Science Education, 2009, 21, 4, 71

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    Laura B. Smolkin, Erin M. McTigue, Carol A. Donovan, Julianne M. Coleman, Explanation in science trade books recommended for use with elementary students, Science Education, 2009, 93, 4
  56. 56
    Zhihui Fang, Linda Lamme, Rose Pringle, Jennifer Patrick, Jennifer Sanders, Courtney Zmach, Sara Charbonnet, Melissa Henkel, Integrating Reading into Middle School Science: What we did, found and learned, International Journal of Science Education, 2008, 30, 15, 2067

    CrossRef

  57. 57
    TIMOTHY SHANAHAN, CYNTHIA SHANAHAN, Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content- Area Literacy, Harvard Educational Review, 2008, 78, 1, 40

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    N. M. Mbajiorgu, N. G. Ezechi, E. C. Idoko, Addressing nonscientific presuppositions in genetics using a conceptual change strategy, Science Education, 2007, 91, 3
  59. 59
    Pei-Ling Hsu, Wen-Gin Yang, Print and Image Integration of Science Texts and Reading Comprehension: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2007, 5, 4, 639

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Laura Colucci-Gray, Elena Camino, Giuseppe Barbiero, Donald Gray, From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education, Science Education, 2006, 90, 2
  61. 61
    Zhihui Fang, The Language Demands of Science Reading in Middle School, International Journal of Science Education, 2006, 28, 5, 491

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Zhihui Fang, Mary Schleppegrell, Beverly Cox, Understanding the Language Demands of Schooling: Nouns in Academic Registers, Journal of Literacy Research, 2006, 38, 3, 247

    CrossRef

  63. 63
    Darin Stockdill, Elizabeth Birr Moje, Reading and Content Area Learning, The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,