SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D.Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 3553). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Christie, F. (1989). Language education. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Christie, F. (2001). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M.Schleppegrell & M. C.Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second language: Meaning with power (pp. 4566). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Christie, F., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
  • Derewianka, B. (1999). An editorial footnote. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 22(1), 2225.
  • Draper, R. (2002). Every teacher a literacy teacher? An analysis of the literacy-related messages in secondary methods textbooks. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 357384.
  • Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.
  • Glenco/McGraw-Hill (2000). Science voyages (red level, Florida edition). New York: Glenco/McGraw-Hill.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993a). Language in a changing world. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. Occasional Paper 13.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993b). The construction of knowledge and value in the grammar of scientific discourse: Charles Darwin's The Origin of the Species. In M. A. K.Halliday & J. R.Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 86105). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993c). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993d). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. A. K.Halliday & J. R.Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 6985). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In J. R.Martin & R.Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 185235). London: Routledge.
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Hasan, R., & Martin, J. R. (1989). Language development: Learning language, learning culture. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.Martin & R.Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87113). London: Routledge.
  • Lemke, J. (2001). Foreword. In J.Wellington & J.Osborne (Eds.), Language and literacy in science education (pp ivv). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Martin, J. R. (1992). English text. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
  • Martin, J. R. (1998). Discourses of science: Recontextualisation, genesis, intertextuality and hegemony. In J.Martin & R.Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 314). London: Routledge.
  • Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. New York: Routledge.
  • Miller, G. (1969). The psychology of communication: Seven essays. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) (2003). NAEP report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
  • National Research Council (NRC) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224240.
  • O'Brien, D., Stewart, R., & Moje, E. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 442463.
  • Prentice-Hall (2001). Science explorer. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Roth, W., & Lawless, D. (2002). Science, culture, and the emergence of language. Science Education, 86(3), 368400.
  • Rutherford, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Schleppegrell, M. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 2(4), 431459.
  • Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Scott Foresman (2000). Science. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • Shymansky, J., Yore, L., & Good, R. (1991). Elementary school teachers' beliefs about and perceptions of elementary school science, science reading, science textbooks, and supportive instructional factors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(5), 437454.
  • Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Veel, R. (1997). Learning how to mean—scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In F.Christie & J. R.Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 161195). London: Cassell.
  • Victor, E., & Kellough, R. (2000). Science for the elementary and middle school (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Wells, G. (1994). The complementary contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky to a ‘language-based theory of learning’. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 4190.
  • Wignell, P., Martin, J. R., & Eggins, S. (1993). The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. In M. A. K.Halliday & J. R.Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 136165). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.