SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but.… Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 215233.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000a). The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 10571095.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000b). Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665701.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University.
  • Anderson, D., Fisher, K., & Norman, G. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 952978.
  • Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88, 655682.
  • Bishop, B., & Anderson, C. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415427.
  • Brem, S., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution. College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181206.
  • Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., Letts, W., & Shipman, H. (2002). Evidence and warrants for belief in a college astronomy course. Science and Education, 11, 573588.
  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Clough, M. (1995). Diminish students' resistance to biological evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 5, 401415.
  • Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429445.
  • Dagher, Z., Brickhouse, N., Shipman, H., & Letts, W. (2004). How some college students represent their understanding of scientific theories. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 735755.
  • Demastes, S., Good, R., & Peebles, P. (1995). Students' conceptual ecologies and the process of conceptual change in evolution. Science Education, 79, 637666.
  • Driver, R., Leach, J. Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Duschl, R. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Elgin, M. (2003). Biology and a priori laws. Philosophy of Science, 70, 13801389.
  • Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. (1998). The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 12311256.
  • Fysh, R., & Lucas, K. (1998). Religious beliefs in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 28, 399427.
  • Ghiselin, M. (1997). Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Gibbs, A., & Lawson, A. (1992). The nature of scientific thinking as reflected by the work of biologists and by biology textbooks. American Biology Teacher, 54, 137152.
  • Griffiths, A., & Barman, C. (1995). High school students' views about the nature of science: Results from three countries. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 248255.
  • Jackson, D., Doster, E., Meadows, L., & Wood, T. (1995). Hearts and minds in the science classroom: The education of a confirmed evolutionist. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 9395.
  • Jiménez Aleixandre, M. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 5161.
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 551578.
  • Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87, 831848.
  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science. Norwood: Ablex.
  • Mahner, M., & Bunge, M. (1997). Foundations of biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Matthews, M. (2000). Time for science education: How teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to scientific literacy. New York: Plenum-Kluwer.
  • Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York: Basic Books.
  • McComas, W., Clough, M., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In McComas, W. (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (p. 339) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • McComas, W., & Olson, J. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In McComas, W. (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (p. 4170) Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Meyling, H. (1997). How to change students' conceptions of the epistemology of science. Science & Education, 6, 397416.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy.
  • National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.
  • Norris, S. (1985). The philosophical basis of observation in science and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 817833.
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692720.
  • Passmore, C., & Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 185204.
  • Root-Bernstein, R. (1984). On defining scientific theory: Creationism considered. In A.Montagu (Ed.), Science and creationism (pp. 6494) New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Rose, S. (1998). Lifelines: Biology beyond determinism. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Roth, M.-W., & Lucas, K. (1997). From “truth” to “inverted reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145179.
  • Rudolph, J. (2000). Reconsidering the ‘nature of science’ as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 403419.
  • Ruse, M. (1988). Philosophy of biology today. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. (1992). Students' preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559580.
  • Sandoval, W., & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 369392.
  • Schwab, J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In The teaching of science (pp. 1103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shipman, H., Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., & Letts, W. (2002). Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Science Education, 86, 526547.
  • Sinatra, G., Southerland, S., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510528.
  • Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Solomon, J., Duveen, J., Scott, L., & McCarthy, S. (1992). Teaching about the nature of science through history: Action research in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 409421.
  • Stewart, J., & Rudolph, J. (2001). Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula. Science Education, 85, 207222.
  • Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.